SOIL CHEMICAL VARIATION AFFECT RUBBER PRODUCTIVITY IN STATE ENTREPRISES PLANTATION

Benny Hendricrianto, Kurniawan Sigit Wicaksono, Syahrul Kurniawan

B. Hendricrianto1,2, K. S. Wicaksono3 and S. Kurniawan2,3,*

1PTPN 1 Regional 5, Jalan Rajawali No. 44, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

2Soil and Water Management Study Program, Faculty of Bio-Industry, Agriculture and Forestry, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, East Java, Indonesia

3Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Bio-Industry, Agriculture and Forestry, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, East Java, Indonesia

Corresponding Author: syahrul.fp@ub.ac.id
Published Online First: June 19, 2026

ABSTRACT

Variations in rubber production are thought to be influenced by differences in soil fertility. The study aimed to analyze and evaluate soil fertility variation in different rubber productivity. The research was conducted from January to June 2024 in Banjarsari Plantation, PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5 Jember Regency, especially at two contrast rubber productivity (i.e., high and low productivity). The classification of rubber productivity determined from the average rubber production during the last 3 years before the research, namely land with high productivity has a production ≥ 1,500 kg ha-1, while land with low productivity has a production ≤ 1000 kg ha-1. All the research plot was located at 12-13 years old of rubber which is cultivated in monoculture systems, especially at clone RRIC-100. Soil sample were collected on a plot size 20 m × 20 m at 2 depths (i.e., 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm) of the high and low rubber productivity with 3 replications of each. Soil chemical properties were measured, including soil organic C, pH, total N, available P, soil exchangeable K, Ca, Mg, Na, Cation Echange Capacity (CEC), and base saturation (%). The study found that the land with high rubber productivity had 72-85% higher of soil exchangeable Na as compared to the land with low rubber productivity at 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depths, as well as had 46% higher of total N at the top 20 cm of soil. In contrast, the land with low rubber productivity had 41% and 11% higher of soil exchangeable K and Ca as compared to the land with high rubber productivity, probably due to the high K and Ca uptake for supporting rubber production. Pearson correlation and principal component analysis (PCA) test highlighted the significant relationship between functional elements such as soil exchangeable Na and latex production (r = 0.82, r table 5% = 0.497, p-value = 0.001). Therefore, increasing soil fertility through combining organic and inorganic fertilizer containing N and Na (e.g., potassium nitrate or borate fertilizers)  can be helpful in areas with low rubber productivity for sustainable rubber production.

Keywords: Monoculture rubber plantation; Rubber productivity; Soil chemical properties; Soil management
Open Access: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

INTRODUCTION

Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) is an export commodity that contributes to the increase in Indonesia's foreign exchange. Indonesia is the second largest rubber producer in the world, having 2.7 million tons of rubber export per year (from the period 2014 – 2019) and 28.7% market share in the world (Zuhdi and Anggraini, 2020). However, Indonesian Statistics Bureau reported that total volume of rubber export (natural and synthetic) from 2013 to 2023 has declined up to 30% (BPS, 2024). This was probably related to the decreases of Indonesia rubber production in 2023 as compared to 2013 around 31% (~996,607 tons of rubber).   

State owned enterprises of rubber plantation, covers an area of 122879 ha or 8.5% of total rubber plantation area in Indonesia, has experienced in declining productivity from 1.05 ton/ha in 2013 become 0.8 ton/ha in 2023 (BPS, 2024). The decreases in rubber productivity is possibly related to soil fertility degradation, especially the low of soil nutrient availability (i.e., C, N, P, K, Ca, Mg). Vrignon-Brenas et al. (2019) stated that soil chemical properties influence rubber tree growth and latex yield by regulating nutrient uptake efficiency and overall physiological processes. In addition, Ogidi et al. (2018) reported that the balance of macro- and micronutrients within the soil significantly influences the growth, vigor, and consequently, the latex yield of rubber trees. The other research by Fatmawati et al. (2021) showed that the low concentrations of essential elements such as phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and organic carbon, are often exacerbated by soil acidity and agricultural practices.

Beside essential nutrients, functional elements (i.e., Na) plays an important role on rubber productivity. Sodium (Na) has been studied for its potential to substitute for potassium in certain physiological processes, thereby offering a possible strategy to mitigate nutrient deficiences and reduce reliance on potassium fertilizers in rubber cultivation (Thorne and Maathuis, 2022). While, Battie-Laclau et al. (2016) and Mateus et al. (2021) stated that Na contributes to osmotic adjustment, stomatal regulation, and turgor maintenance, which are vital processes for optimizing water use efficiency and photosynthesis performance in rubber trees. However, Na is easier losses through leaching, necessitating careful management strategies to maintain adequate availability for plant uptake (e.g., rubber) while preventing environmental runoff (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2016). This situation necessitate a thorough understanding of the relationship between soil nutrient status and rubber tree performance to optimize fertilization strategies and improve overall productivity (Kullawong et al., 2020; Saeteng et al., 2022).

The response to fertilization in rubber plants depends on their nutrient status. Salisu et al. (2013) stated that knowledge on soil nutrient status helps in proper fertilization in rubber plantation, as different soil fertility respond differently to the fertilizers. Under nutrient deficiency conditions, rubber plants are highly responsive to fertilization, which can further increase growth and production. One area of rubber plantations with low productivity suspected to be related to soil fertility levels is the Banjarsari Plantation Jember, PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5, planted in 2013. The total area of mature rubber trees (TM) at the Banjarsari Plantation is 638.41 ha, with an average annual production of 992,631 kg. Although the overall average productivity is categorized as high (1,555 kg/ha), a significant yield gap exists in the field. On one hand, there are blocks with high productivity (≥ 1,500 kg/ha), while on the other, several blocks show low productivity (≤ 1,000 kg/ha) despite being under the same management. This productivity gap serves as the basis for evaluating whether soil chemical factors are the primary cause of these yield differences. In addition, all block with different rubber productivity did not applied fertilizer during the last 5 years, and therefore differences in rubber productivity may have an impact on soil nutrient status. To date, no evaluation has been conducted regarding soil fertility and the impact of fertility management on rubber production at this plantation. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate soil fertility conditions across different rubber productivity levels as a foundation for improving soil fertility management. Based on this background, this study aims to evaluate the soil fertility  status of high and low productivity lands at the Banjarsari Plantation, PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5. We hypothesized that the high rubber productivity is directly correspond to soil nutrient content, however the high rubber productivity can lead to decrease soil nutrient content if not balanced by proper fertilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study siteThe research was conducted from January to June 2024 at Banjarsari Plantation, PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5 Jember Regency especially (Figure 1). Geographycally, the site is located at 8°10'51"S 113°35'35"E to 8°11'10"S 113°35'05"E. The average rainfall during the research was 121.33±28.4 mm/month, average air temperature 28.2 ± 0.27 ºC, and average air humidity 79.7 ± 2.13 % (PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5, 2024). In addition, the site is located in an lowland area with a mean elevation of 45 m and soil type is Regosol and Latosol.

SOIL CHEMICAL VARIATION AFFECT RUBBER PRODUCTIVITY IN STATE ENTREPRISES PLANTATION — Figure 1

Figure 1. Research Location Map in the PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5 Jember Regency, Jember East Java, Indonesia  

Research design and data collection methodThe field research was conducted at the rubber plantation that have a high and low rubber productivity. The high and low rubber productivity was determined from the record of rubber productivity from 2020 to 2022 (Table 2). The land with low rubber productivity has annual production 863 ± 114.18 kg ha-1 (≤ 1000 kg ha-1), whereas the anual production in the land with high rubber productivity was 1511.3 ± 139.75 kg ha-1 (≥1500 kg ha-1). The low rubber productivity had rubber productivity ≤ 1000 kg/ha, while the high rubber productivity had ≥ 1500 kg/ha. Rubber tree was planted with spacing 6 m x 3 m. In addition, the rubber tree is planted on 2012 and 2013  with clone of PB 260, which has characteristics such as rapid latex metabolism (quick starter), with initial production exceeding 1500 kg ha-1 per year and subsequent production reaching 2500-3000 kg ha-1per year. Other characteristics include good growth, strong wind resistance, high resistance to pink disease (Upasia salmonicolor), and a positive response to latex stimulants (PT Perkebunan Nusantara XII, 2018). Prior to our study, fertilizer (i.e., NPK fertilizer) and/or soil amendments such as lime (i.e., CaCO3) or dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2) was not applied in the land with high and low rubber productivity during the last five years.

Table 2. Rubber productivity in the research plot during 2019 to 2023

Year

Area (ha)

Productivity (kg ha-1)

Low

High

2020

99.31

635

1,239

2021

99.31

966

1,593

2022

99.31

988

1,702

Sample collection: At each the land area with high and low rubber productivity, the research plot was set up at a size 20 m x 20 m, with three replication of each (Fig. 2). The minimum distance between plots was keptat least 500 m. Soil sample was collected at 5 sampling point and two soil depth i.e., at 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm (Fig. 2). At each depth of soil, soil sample from the 5 sampling points in each plot was homogenously mixed due to the plot is homogen (i.e., rubber old, slope, topography, soil type and management), then the soil was air dried, and a representative sample was taken (approximately 200 g) for laboratory analysis.

SOIL CHEMICAL VARIATION AFFECT RUBBER PRODUCTIVITY IN STATE ENTREPRISES PLANTATION — Figure 2

Figure 2. Soil sampling design at each plot

Sample analysis: The laboratory analysis was conducted at the University of Jember/State Polytechnic of Jember and International Cofffee and Cacao Research Institute (ICCRI) Jember, Indonesia. The variable measured including soil organic C, pH, total N, available P, exchangeable K, exchangeable Ca, exchangeable Mg, exchangeable Na, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and base saturation (%). Soil organic C was determined using Walkley-Black method, and total N using Kjeldahl method (Balai Pengujian Standar Instrument Tanah dan Pupuk, 2023). Soil available P was analyzed using spectrophotometry, where soil exchangeable K was analyzed using Ammonium Acetate (NH₄OAc) Extraction method (Balai Pengujian Standar Instrument Tanah dan Pupuk, 2023).

Data analysis methods: Prior to statistical analysis, the data was tested for normality (ShapiroWilk’s test). For the not-normal data (p ≤ 0.05), the data was transformed using logarithmic or square-root to minimize the outlier data and to equalize the variance. To analyze differences of soil chemical properties between the high and low rubber productivity, as well as between the top (0-20 cm) and the sub (20-40 cm) soils we used Linear Mixed Effect Model (Kurniawan et al., 2018) with rubber productivity and soil depth as the fixed effect, whereas the replicate plots as the random effect. The LME used due to this analysis is particularly powerful because soil data is almost never truly independent. While, to analyze the relationship among soil chemical properties and the relationship between soil nutrient characteristics and rubber productivity were conducted using Pearson correlation and  Principal Component Analysis (PCA). All statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.1.0.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Soil organic carbon and nitrogen between low and high rubber productivitySoil organic C and total nitrogen is mainly affected to rubber productivity. The laboratory analysis showed that soil organic C in the low and rubber productivity ranged from 1.21 % to 4.97 % at 0-20 cm depth of soil and 1.17% to 2.67% at 20-40 cm depth of soil. The organic C in the Banjarsari rubber plantation had high variation in soil organic C content, showed by the amount of soil organic C was from low to very high, especially in the top soil (Balai Pengujian Standar Instrument Tanah dan Pupuk, 2023). While, soil organic C in the sub soil was ranged from low to medium class. In addition, the study detected that soil organic C between the low and the high rubber productivity was comparable (1.79±0.25 % and 2.46±0.56 %; Fig. 3A). Unfortunately, the study was unable detected significant different of soil organic C between the top 20 cm and the 20-40 cm depth of soil (2.46±0.57 % and 1.79±0.22 %; Fig. 3B). This was probably due to the input of organic matter from leaf litter and organic fertilizer. Compared to the soil organic C in the rubber plantation in Jambi – Sumatra, the average soil organic C in the Banjarsari rubber plantation (1.76% - 3.15%) was higher than soil organic C in the smallholder rubber plantation in Jambi – Sumatra (0.90% - 1.56%), reported by Kurniawan et al. (2018).

SOIL CHEMICAL VARIATION AFFECT RUBBER PRODUCTIVITY IN STATE ENTREPRISES PLANTATION — Figure 3

Figure 3. Soil organic carbon (A) and total nitrogen (C) in the low and high rubber productivity, and in the 0-20 cm (B) and 20-40 cm (D) soil depth within Banjarsari rubber plantation, Jember – Indonesia

Total N in the Banjarsari rubber plantation ranged from 0.05% to 0.155% in the top soil (0-20 cm) and 0.08 g/100g – 0.23 g/100g in the sub soil. Statistical analysis showed that total N between the low and high rubber productivity, as well as between the top and the sub soil, were comparable (P = 0.197; Fig. 3C and D). However, the high rubber productivity (0.13 ± 0.02 g N/100g) tend to have 46% higher of total N than those in the low rubber productivity (0.09 ± 0.01 g N/100g). This result indicated that the soil condition in the high rubber productivity is more fertile as compared to the low rubber productivity. In addition, the lower total N in the low rubber productivity as compared to the high rubber productivity was probably due to higher N losses (i.e., leaching, volatilisasi) in the low than in the high rubber productivity. Utami et al. (2021) reported that total soil pore at 0-20 cm depth of soil in the rubber plantation was around 50%, which may potentially support nutrient leaching process.

Nitrogen is the primary essential nutrient and play a crucial role in increasing rubber growth and productivity. The previous research reported that the role of nitrogen in the rubber plantation consist of promoting vigorous growth, increasing latex yield and quality, and enhancing the nutritional content of the latex (Jin et al., 2024). However, a research by Lopez et al. (2025) reported that the increases in application doses of NPK fertilizers did not significantly affected to the growth of isodiametric trunk and rubber yields. Therefore, proper nitrogen fertilization can helps the rubber trees growing faster, reaching tapping age sooner, and maintaining higher productivity.

Soil exchangeable cation between low and high rubber productivity: The study detected a high vation in soil exchangeable base cation (i.e., K, Na, Ca) between the low and high rubber productivity, whereas the soil exchangeable Mg between the low and high rubber productivity was comparable (Fig. 4A-D). Soil in the low rubber productivity had 41% and 11% higher of soil exchangeable K and Ca (1.61 ± 0.10 cmolc/kg and 9.27 ± 0.25 cmolc/kg, respectively) as compared to those in the high rubber productivity (1.14 ± 0.17 cmolc/kg and 8.34 ± 0.29 cmolc/kg) at all soil depth (Fig. 4A and C). In contrast, soil exchangeable Na in the high rubber productivity was 78% higher than those in the low rubber productivity (Figure 4B). Furthermore, soil exchangeable base cations (i.e., K, Na, Ca, Mg) between the top and the sub soil at rubber plantation within Banjarsari rubber plantation was not significant different (P ≥ 0,05; Fig. 4 E-H).

The higher soil exchangeable K and Ca, as well as the lower soil exchangeable Na, in the low than in the high rubber productivity may affected by nutrient uptake by plant. In general, plants absorb more K and Ca than Na because these two nutrients are essential nutrients. Potassium has a positive effect on latex yield and quality,  translocation of sugars to the latex-producing vessels (the latex sink), and regulation of stomatal function and maintains turgor pressure in plant cells (Putra et al., 2022). While Ca helps to increase the yield of latex by facilitating the uptake of other nutrients like magnesium, root development, and increased latex yield (Putra et al., 2022). Therefore, the lower soil exchangeable K and Ca in the high rubber productivity than those in the low rubber productivity inlined with the latex production. This was supported by the measurement on 2024, latex production in the high rubber productivity ranged from 1567 – 2041 kg/ha, whereas in the low rubber productivity was 704 – 1094 kg/ha. Furthermore, the lower K and Ca in the land with high rubber productivity than those in the low rubber productivity may related to fertilization. Field interview with the field workers noted that the study area did not applied fertilizer (e.g., NPKCa) and soil amendment (i.e., lime or dolomite) containing Ca. Therefore, the depletion of soil nutrients through harvesting and the low nutrient inputs (K, Ca) from bulk precipitation have led to a decrease in soil exchangeable K and Ca. This result inlined with our hypothesis that the high rubber productivity can lead to decrease soil nutrient content (i.e., K and Ca) if not balanced by proper fertilization.

Compared to the previous research, soil exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg (1.12 – 1.62 cmol K/kg, 7.91 – 9.34 cmol Ca/kg, and 2.93 – 3.43 cmol Mg/kg) in our study area were higher than those reported by Yasin et al. (2010) who measured soil exchangeable cations at the 10th and 15th age of rubber plantation in Ultisol – Dhamasraya, West Sumatera (0.39 – 0.41 cmol K kg-1, 0.48 – 0.68 cmol Ca/kg, and 0.13 – 0.16 cmol Mg kg-1). This is showed that soil in the Banjarsari rubber plantation area is more fertile as compared to soil in the rubber plantation in the Dhamasraya West Sumatera, probably due to soil in the Banjarsari rubber plantation was younger than soil in the study area of Yasin et al. (2010). In addition, the Pearson correlation test showed strong relationship between soil exchangeable Mg and base saturation (Table 3).

SOIL CHEMICAL VARIATION AFFECT RUBBER PRODUCTIVITY IN STATE ENTREPRISES PLANTATION — Figure 4

Figure 4. Soil exchangeable base cations (K, Na, Ca, Mg) between the low and high rubber productivity (A-D) at all soil depth (E-H) in the Banjarsari rubber plantation, Jember – Indonesia

Soil available P and potential soil fertility between the low and high rubber productivityThe average of soil available P between the low and high rubber productivity area ranged from 4.68 – 14.72 mg kg-1, categorized as very low to low soil available P (Fig. 5; Balai Pengujian Standar Instrumen Tanah dan Pupuk, 2023). At all soil depth, the study detected unsignificant different of soil available P between the area with low and high rubber productivity, as well as between the top and the sub soil (P ≥ 0.05). However, the area with low rubber productivity (11.25±3.42 mg P kg-1) tend to have 90% higher soil available P as compared to the area with high rubber productivity (5.91±2.06 mg P kg-1). This result inlined with soil exchangeable K and Ca where the decreases in soil available in the high rubber productivity due to nutrient depletion through harvest and the low input (i.e., bulk precipitation). P is one of crucial element for supporting rubber tree growth and a key factor for optimizing productivity, especially under monoculture conditions (Hemati et al., 2020). Kurniawan et al. (2017) reported that P lost in the rubber plantation through harvest export and leaching losses was ranged from 2.83 – 4.75 kg P/ha. While, annual input of total P from bulk precipitation ranged from 0,4 – 0,8 kg ha-1 yr-1 (Kurniawan et al., 2018). Thus, the land with high rubber productivity without P fertilizer application, the lost of P through harvest export lead to decrease in the availability of P in the soil. This study suggested that P fertilizer is needed in the area with high rubber productivity to maintain soil available P level and rubber productivity.

SOIL CHEMICAL VARIATION AFFECT RUBBER PRODUCTIVITY IN STATE ENTREPRISES PLANTATION — Figure 5

Figure 5. Soil available P, soil pH, CEC, and base saturation between the low and high rubber productivity (A-D) in the top and sub soil (E-H)

Soil in the rubber plantation within Banjarsari plantation PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5 Jember Regency, Indonesia, classified as neutral to slightly alkaline with pH value ranged from 7.33 to 8.33 (Fig. 5). This was due to the soil contain a high amount of base cations (i.e. K, Mg; Fig. 4), supported by the high base saturation (base saturation ranged from 51.46 % - 71.39%; Fig. 5). When the base saturation is high, it means that base cations are abundant and replace acid cations (such as Al3+ and H+) in soil adsorption complexes, resulting the soil pH to become higher. In addition, the study detected unsignificant different of soil pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and base saturation between the low and high rubber productivity at 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depth of soil (Fig. 5 B-D). In addition, soil pH, CEC, and base saturation between 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depth of soil was also comparable (Fig. 5 E-H). In addition, the Pearson correlation test (Table 3) showed the strong positive correlation (r = 0.75, r table = 0.497, p value = 0.005) between base saturation and soil exchangeable Mg, indicated that the low variation in base saturation between the area with high and low rubber productivity (59.34±6.39 % and 59.50±7.66 %, respectively). Furthermore, the base saturation in the study area is classified as medium to high (Balai Pengujian Standar Instrumen Tanah dan Pupuk, 2023), indicated that the soil inherently possess a greater capacity for cation retention, which is crucial for nutrient availability in rubber plantations (Allen et al., 2015).

The relationship between soil chemical characteristics and latex production: Latex production in 2024 was ranged from 714– 2041 kg ha-1 (Table 2). The area of high rubber productivity had 91% higher of latex production (1831.67 ± 139.60 kg ha-1) as compared to the area of low rubber productivity (957.00 ± 121.83 kg ha-1). Latex production is affected by internal (i.e., clone, age, and plant physiology) and external (i.e., climate, soil, tapping practice). Related to soil nutrient, latex production had positive correlation to soil exchangeable Na (Pearson correlation, r = 0.82, r table 5% = 0.497, p value = 0.001; Table 3). This result shown that functional elements such as Na plays an important role on stomatal regulation and increases photosynthesis performance in rubber trees (Battie-Laclau et al., 2016; Mateus et al., 2021)  In contrast, latex production tend to have negative correlation with soil exchangeable Ca and soil available P (Table 3, p value = 0.11). In addition, soil soil total N showed the trend of positive correlation to latex production (r = 0.45, p-value = 0.14, Table 3). The study was unable to detected significant correlation between cation exchange capacity, base saturation, soil pH, and soil organic C with latex production (Table 3). This result similar to Putra et al. (2022) who reported that soil exchangeable cations (i.e., K, Ca, Mg) was insignificant correlated to latex production (r = -0.18 to 0.11). Further, the growth and production of rubber is mainly affected by soil and climate condition. Therefore, the low soil fertility due to low organic matter content, soil pH, and availability of potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) are limiting factors for rubber growth and production (Ardika and Sanchez, 2025).

 

Table 3. Matrix Pearson coefficient correlation among soil chemical properties and rubber productivity in the the Banjarsari rubber plantation, Jember – Indonesia  

 

Parameter

Soil org. C (g/100g)

Total N (g/100g)

Soil exc. K (cmolc/kg)

Soil exc. Na (cmolc/kg)

Soil exc. Ca (cmolc/kg)

Soil exc. Mg (cmolc/kg)

Soil pH

Soil available P (mg/kg)

CEC (cmolc/kg)

Base saturation (%)

Rubber productivity (kg/ha)

Soil org. C (g/100g)

1

0.32

-0.06

0.22

-0.46

-0.09

-0.45

0.13

-0.49

0.13

0.20

Total N (g/100g)

0.32

1

-0.58*

0.10

-0.40

-0.42

0.33

-0.04

-0.004

-0.27

0.45

Soil exc. K (cmolc/kg)

-0.06

-0.58*

1

-0.19

0.45

-0.06

-0.29

0.19

0.08

0.09

-0.36

Soil exc. Na (cmolc/kg)

0.22

0.10

-0.19

1

-0.20

0.24

0.30

-0.44

0.44

-0.007

0.82**

Soil exc. Ca (cmolc/kg)

-0.46

-0.40

0.45

-0.20

1

0.14

0.13

-0.18

0.29

0.31

-0.48

Soil exc. Mg (cmolc/kg)

-0.09

-0.42

-0.06

0.24

0.14

1

0.06

-0.05

-0.37

0.75**

0.0004

Soil pH

-0.45

0.33

-0.29

0.30

0.13

0.06

1

-0.25

0.46

-0.03

0.36

Soil available P (mg/kg)

0.13

-0.04

0.19

-0.44

-0.18

-0.05

-0.25

1

-0.60*

-0.25

-0.48

CEC (cmolc/kg)

-0.49

-0.004

0.08

0.44

0.29

-0.37

0.46

-0.60*

1

-0.40

0.42

Base saturation (%)

0.13

-0.27

0.09

-0.007

0.31

0.75**

-0.03

-0.25

-0.40

1

-0.11

Rubber productivity (kg/ha)

0.20

0.45

-0.36

0.82**

-0.48

0.0004

0.36

-0.48

0.42

-0.11

1

= significant different at p ≤ 0.05; ** = significant different at p ≤ 0.01; r table 5% = 0.497

The principal component analysis (PCA) performed using fixed factor-mean data (Table 4; Figure 6A) demonstrated a strong multivariate structure among soil chemical properties and rubber productivity variables. PC1 exhibited an eigenvalue of 8.482 and explained 57.83% of the total variance, while PC2 showed an eigenvalue of 5.086 and accounted for 34.67% of the variance. Collectively, the first two principal components explained 92.51% of the cumulative variance, indicating that the majority of variability in the fixed factor (i.e., low and high rubber productivity, soil depth) dataset could be effectively represented within a two-dimensional ordination space. The high cumulative variance suggests that the treatment-based PCA successfully reduced dataset dimensionality while preserving most of the information contained within the original variables. This strong separation pattern observed in Figure 6A reflects the reduced within-the land with difference rubber productivity and soil depth  variability resulting from replicate averaging, thereby emphasizing the dominant differences among sampling site. Variables with similar vector orientations in the PCA biplot likely exhibited positive correlations, whereas variables positioned in opposite directions reflected contrasting responses among treatments. The high explanatory power of PC1 and PC2 indicates that soil nutrient content and rubber productivity responses were strongly structured across the treatment gradients.

Table 4. Eigenvalues, explained variance, and cumulative variance of principal components derived from soil chemical properties and rubber productivity variables.

 

Principal Component

Eigenvalue

Variance Explained (%)

Cumulative Variance (%)

PC1

8.482

57.832

57.832

PC2

5.086

34.674

92.506

PC3

1.099

7.494

100.000

PC4

0.000

0.000

100.000

In contrast, the PCA based on all individual observations without averaging replication (Table 5; Figure 6B) revealed a more moderate and realistic multivariate structure. PC1 explained 29.30% of the total variance with an eigenvalue of 3.516, while PC2 contributed 22.61% with an eigenvalue of 2.713. Together, the first two components accounted for 51.91% of the cumulative variance, substantially lower than the treatment-mean PCA (Table 4, Figure 6A). Additional variability was distributed across higher principal components, particularly PC3 (18.79%) and PC4 (11.50%), indicating the presence of considerable heterogeneity among individual soil samples / replication. This pattern suggests that soil chemical properties and rubber productivity were influenced by multiple interacting factors rather than a single dominant gradient. The lower variance explained in Figure 6B reflects the preservation of natural biological and environmental variability among replicates, which is commonly observed in soil ecological datasets. Consequently, the individual-observation PCA provides a more conservative yet statistically robust representation of the relationships among soil properties and productivity variables. The contrast between Figures 6A and 6B demonstrates how replicate averaging can artificially strengthen apparent multivariate separation by minimizing within-group variation, whereas analysis using all independent observations preserves the true complexity and variability of the soil system.

 

Table 5. Eigenvalues, explained variance, and cumulative variance of principal components derived from soil chemical properties and rubber productivity variables.

 

Principal Component

Eigenvalue

Variance Explained (%)

Cumulative Variance (%)

PC1

3.516

29.296

29.296

PC2

2.713

22.610

51.906

PC3

2.255

18.793

70.699

PC4

1.380

11.502

82.202

PC5

0.884

7.371

89.572

PC6

0.665

5.546

95.118

PC7

0.344

2.866

97.984

PC8

0.175

1.455

99.438

PC9

0.054

0.451

99.889

PC10

0.012

0.099

99.988

PC11

0.001

0.012

100.000

Overall, PCA result showed soil exchangeable Na, total N, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and soil organic C affected to latex production. Gashua et al. (2023) stated that organic nitrogen sources often promote healthier root systems in crops, which are essential for efficient nutrient and water uptake. While, Ginting and Astuti (2017) reported that application of macro and micro nutrients on the rubber rods enhance the production of latex and dry rubber content value.

SOIL CHEMICAL VARIATION AFFECT RUBBER PRODUCTIVITY IN STATE ENTREPRISES PLANTATION — Figure 6

Figure 6. Principal component analysis of the relationship between soil chemical characteristics and latex production in the low and high rubber productivity (a) and clustering based on the low and high rubber productivity (b). Note: N = 12, C.org = soil organic C, Productivity = latex production, Exc. K, Na, Ca, Mg = soil exchangeable K, Na, Ca, Mg, Total N = soil total N, Available P = soil available P, BS = base saturation, CEC = cation exchange capacity.

 

Conclusion: The study highlighted that soil chemical properties (i.e., total N, soil exchangeable K, Na, and Ca) was significantly different between in the high and low productivity areas of Banjarsari Rubber Plantation, PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5. Differences in soil chemical properties affect to the rubber production, supported by the relationship between rubber production and soil exchangeable cations (i.e., Na). In addition, this research detected the increases of nutrient concentration in the deeper layer such as N and Ca, indicated nutrient leaching losses. Thus, in the areas with low rubber productivity, fertilization should be carried out properly to increase rubber yield, particularly by combining organic and inorganic fertilizers such as NP fertilizers.  While, the decline in essential macronutrient content (i.e., P, K, and Ca) in the high-productivity rubber plantations underscores the urgent need for proper application of NPKCa fertilizers to maintain soil nutrient content and rubber productivity.

Acknowledgement : The author thanks the field assistant for helping with soil sample collection and the local workers for their contribution in measuring rubber production.

Funding : This research did not received external funding.

Authorship contribution statement :B.H: Conceptualization, research design, data collection and analysis, writing, review, and finalization of manuscript; S.K.: Conceptualization, supervision, data analysis, writing of manuscript, and finalization; K.S.W: Data analysis, supervision, writing the draft of manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest : The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

Allen, K., M.D. Corre, A. Tjoa and E. Veldkamp (2015). Soil Nitrogen-Cycling Responses to Conversion of Lowland Forests to Oil Palm and Rubber Plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia. PLoS ONE, 10(7): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133325

Ardika, R. and P. Sanchez (2025). Effect of Ethephon Stimulation and Fertilizer Applications on Nutrient Dynamics of Rubber Clones in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Agronomy. 53(1): 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.24831/jai.v53i1.59931

Badan Pusat Statistik - BPS. (2024). Statistik Karet Indonesia 2023. Jakarta.

Balai Pengujian Sandar Instrumen (BPSI) Tanah dan Pupuk (2023). Petunjuk Teknis Edisi 3: Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk. Penerbit Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia (Available in Indonesian version). https://repository.pertanian.go.id/server/api/core/bitstreams/9313cd49-5eaa-4a45-9709-5776ce28e99f/content

Battie‐Laclau, P., J.S. Delgado-Rojas, M. Christina, Y. Nouvellon, J. Bouillet, M. de C. Píccolo, M. Z. Moreira, J.L. de M. Gonçalves, O. Roupsard and J. Laclau (2016). Potassium fertilization increases water-use efficiency for stem biomass production without affecting intrinsic water-use efficiency in Eucalyptus grandis plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 364: 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.004

Fatmawati, A.A., N. Hermita, A. Munandar, M.B. Syamsunarno, D. Hermawan, L.A. Agung and A.N. Putra (2021). Study of Soil Fertility Status in Some Use of Rubber Plant Land in Pandeglang and Lebak Regencies, Banten Province. In 2nd and 3rd International Conference on Food Security Innovation (ICFSI 2018-2019) (pp. 183-185). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.210304.032

Gashua, A.G., Z. Sulaiman, M. Yusoff, M.Y.A. Samad, M.F. Ramlan and S.J. Mokhatar (2023). Short-Term Effects of Bokashi Fertilizer with Reduced NPK Fertilization on Soil Fertility, Growth, and Yield of Rubber Trees. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 46: 839–859. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.46.3.07

Ginting, C. and Y.T.M. Astuti (2017). Increasing Latex Production of Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliencis) by Nutrient Infusion. Agroista Jurnal Agroteknologi Vol. 1 (2): 163 – 170. https://jurnal.instiperjogja.ac.id/index.php/AGI/article/view/17/17

Hemati, Z., S. Selvalakshmi, S. Xia and X. Yang (2020). Identification of Indicators:  Monitoring the Impact of Rubber Plantation on Soil Quality in Xishuangbana, Southwest China. Journal Ecological Indicators 116: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106491.  

Jin, D., Z. Cha, J. Li, Y. Huang, H. Yang, H. Liu, W. Luo and Q. Lin (2024). Reinforcing Nitrogen Nutrition Through Partial Substitution with Organic Nitrogen Enhances the Properties of Natural Rubber. Forests Vol 15, 1897: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15111897

Kullawong, S., S. Aditto, B. Chambon and A. Promkhambut (2020). Farmer fertilization practices of mature rubber plantations in Northeast Thailand during a period of low rubber prices. Forest and Society, 4 (1), 162-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i1.8980

Kurniawan, S., M.D. Corre, S.R. Utami and E. Veldkamp (2017). Partial nutrient budget from lowlandforests converted to oil palm and rubberplantations in Sumatra, Indonesia. In: A.Isnansetyo & T. R. Nuringtyas (Eds.), Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on TropicalAgriculture, pp. 273-285. Cham, CH: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60363-6_26

Kurniawan, S., M.D. Corre, A. L. Matson, H. Schulte-Bisping, S. R. Utami, O. van Straaten, and E. Veldkamp (2018). Conversion of tropical forests to smallholder rubber and oil palm plantations impacts nutrient leaching losses and nutrient retention efficiency in highly weathered soils. Biogeosciences 15, 5131–5154. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5131-2018

Lopez, E.J., S.E. Francis, A.Y. Joseph, K. Djézou, K. Antoine and O. Samuel (2025). Response of Rubber tree GT1, PB235, and PB217 clones to different doses of mineral fertilizers in south-west Côte d'Ivoire. Plantropica: Journal of Agricultural Science 10 (1): 75-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpt.2025.010.1.8

Mateus, N. S., A.L. Florentino, J.B. Oliveira, E.F. Santos, S.A. Gaziola, M.L. Rossi, F.S. Linhares, J.A. Bendassolli, R.A. Azevedo and J. Lavres (2021). Leaf 13C and 15N composition shedding light on easing drought stress through partial K substitution by Na in eucalyptus species. Scientific Reports, 11(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99710-1

Nieves‐Cordones, M., V. Martı́nez, B. Benito and F. Rubio (2016). Comparison between Arabidopsis and Rice for Main Pathways of K+ and Na+ Uptake by Roots. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 1-14.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00992

Ogidi, E., I.K. Okore and J.C. Dike (2018). Correlation Analysis of Nutrient Soil-Plant Content and Bud Take Success in Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. in Acidic Soil of South Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 6(1): 116-123. https://doi.org/10.18006/2018.6(1).116.123

PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Regional 5 (2024). Laporan Kinerja Kebun Tahun 2024 (Annual Plantation Report 2024. unpublished). Kebun Banjarsari, Jember - Indonesia.

PT Perkebunan Nusantara XII (Persero) (2018). Pedoman Pengelolaan Budidaya Tanaman Karet. Surabaya.

Putra, I.A., H. Hanum, R. Tistama and E. Purba (2022). Cations-Base Application in Rubber Plantation: The Change of Calcium, Magnesium, and Potassium Status in the Soil and Leaves and Its Relation to Latex Yield. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 32 (4): 671-681. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1145446

Saeteng, P., J. Onthong and K. Khawmee (2022). Nutrient status in rubber growing soil, rubber leaf and nutrient concentration in latex under different rubber-based intercropping plantation. The Journal of Applied Science, 21(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14416/j.appsci.2022.01.009

Salisu, M., N. Daud and I. Ahmad (2013). Influence of fertilizer rates and soil series on growth performance of natural rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) latex timber clones. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7(13): 1998-2004. https://www.cropj.com/daud_7_13_2013_1998_2004.pdf

Thorne, S. J. and F.J.M. Maathuis (2022). Reducing potassium deficiency by using sodium fertilisation. Stress Biology, 2(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-022-00070-1

Utami, S.R., S. Kurniawan, C. Agustina and M.D. Corre (2021). Soil macroporosity, physical properties and nutrient leaching after forest conversion to rubber and oil palm plantation in an Acrisol of Jambi, Indonesia. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 9 (1):3155-3163. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2021.091.3155

Vrignon‐Brenas, S., F. Gay, S. Ricard, D. Snoeck, T. Perron, L. Mareschal, J. Laclau, E. Gohet and P. Malagoli (2019). Nutrient management of immature rubber plantations. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0554-6

Yasin, S., Adrinal, Junaedi, E. Wahyudi, S. Herlena and Darmawan (2010). Changes of Soil Properties on Various Ages of Rubber Trees in Dhamasraya, West Sumatra, Indonesia. J Trop Soils 15(3): 221 – 227.  https://journal.unila.ac.id/index.php/tropicalsoil/article/view/99/477

Zuhdi, F. and R.S. Anggraini (2020). The Indonesian Natural Rubber Export Competitiveness in Global Market. International Journal of Agriculture System 8(2): 130-139. DOI: 10.20956/ijas.v8i2.2518



Download Statistics
This Manuscript
Full Text
64
downloads
Indicators
Metrics

Impact Score: 0.65; h Index:51

SJR: 0.20

Indexing
Status

Web of Science (SCIE): Q3

SCOPUS (Q3)

Journal Metrics
Current

Journal Impact Factor (JIF): 0.6; JCR 2026 ; Five Year JIF: 0.7

HEC Category: W

ISSN Details
Verified

Print ISSN: 1018-7081

Electronic ISSN: 2309-8694

Search the Journal

Use the fields below to search for articles by Title, Author, or Keywords.

All Downloads
Full Text
168,903
downloads
Supplementary
658
downloads