ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP

Neelam Arshad, Sajid Abdullah, Moazzam Ali, Humaira Arshad

N. Arshad¹, S. Abdullah1, M. Ali1, H. Arshad1

¹Faculty of Sciences, Department of Zoology, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan,

Corresponding Author: aneelam888@gmail.com
Published Online First: August 11, 2026

ABSTRACT

Antibiotics, used extensively in veterinary medicine and in humans to treat various infectious diseases, have become one of the significant environmental contaminants. These pharmaceutical residues bioaccumulate in the tissues of fish and other aquatic organisms. This study aimed to evaluate the bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, in various tissues of Catla catla and Labeo rohita in response to different doses. For 14 days, fish were acclimatized and three groups were made: one control and two experimental groups, each with 10 fish. Acute exposure to experimental concentrations designated as T1 (7.7 mg/L for L. rohita and 5.7 mg/L for C. catla) and T2 (18 mg/L for L. rohita and 13 mg/L for C. catla) of ciprofloxacin was given to experimental groups. Physico-chemical parameters were maintained regularly. Sampling was done after 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, respectively. At the end of the trial, fish were dissected for HPLC analysis. Data was analyzed statistically using two-way ANOVA and the Tukey test was applied for mean comparison. Results showed that ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation was significant (p 0.05) in T2 (high-dose group) compared to T1 (low-dose group) and the control (T0) for both fish. In L. rohita, maximum bioaccumulation measured was 45.95±0.74 µg/g, 41.59±0.99 µg/g and 25.08±0.69 µg/g, while in C. catla, maximum bioaccumulation measured was 50.98±0.72 µg/g, 43.88±0.50 µg/g and 31.21±0.94 µg/g in the liver, gills and muscles, respectively. To conclude, the bioaccumulation pattern of ciprofloxacin in different organs of both fish was similar: liver˃gills˃muscles. However, comparatively higher bioaccumulation trends occurred in C. catla organs than in L. rohita.

Keywords: Aquaculture, Antibiotics, Ciprofloxacin, HPLC, Bioaccumulation
Open Access: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Arshad et al.,   J. Anim. Plant Sci., 36 (6) 2026

INTRODUCTION

In 2020, aquaculture accounted for 56% of the global aquatic food for direct human consumption (FAO, 2022). From 2000 until now, an average 5.7% increase in total fish production has been reported (Tacon, 2020). On the other hand, there is growing concern over the prevalence of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environments (De-Assis, 2021). Ciprofloxacin is the most prevalent antibiotic in the Bohai Sea's natural saltwater environment (Han et al., 2021).

Antibiotics exhibit varying absorption and bioaccumulation in tissues of aquatic organisms in response to changes in various environmental factors (Chen et al., 2018). The value of annual mean biomagnification factors for ciprofloxacin ranges from 0.18 to 2.25, which suggests that along planktonic food webs, it could undergo biomagnification (Tang et al., 2020). Fish taken from the aquatic environment have been found to contain fluorinated antibiotics. The metabolic stability of quinolone antibiotics may be significantly influenced by a fluorine substituent. By effectively preventing oxidative metabolism, the addition of a fluorine substituent improves metabolic stability and prolongs the antibiotic's residence time in organisms (Sun et al., 2020). Therefore, fish are suitable organisms for research on the monitoring and bioaccumulation of fluoroquinolones. Ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation has been seen in the liver, muscle, bile and plasma of wild fish (Zhang et al., 2021).

Freshwater species of fish are considered important in aquaculture; primarily cultured are cyprinids and carps (Tacon, 2020). Species such as C. catla is a zooplanktivorous and surface feeder (Kibenge, 2022), while L. rohita is an omniplanktivorous and a bottom feeder and is widely cultured and consumed across South Asia (Masood et al., 2022). The risks associated with ciprofloxacin residue in aquatic products and the aquatic ecological environment are significant and are receiving more and more attention (Liu et al., 2022). Despite their economic and nutritional importance, limited information is available on the bioaccumulation potential of ciprofloxacin in these species, which is a widely used antibiotic. Existing studies have largely focused on histopathological, hematological and antioxidant responses, while data on tissue-specific ciprofloxacin accumulation in major carps remain scarce.

Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin at different exposure concentrations in the liver, gills and muscle tissues of C. catla and L. rohita. This study focused on acute, experimentally high exposure to ciprofloxacin to ensure measurable detection of antibiotic residues in fish tissues after short-term exposure. By elucidating species and tissue-specific accumulation patterns, this study provides insight into the potential risks of antibiotic residues entering the aquatic food chain and supports the development of responsible antibiotic use strategies in sustainable aquaculture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design:The experiment was conducted in the toxicology laboratory of Fisheries Research Farm, Department of Zoology, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, in April 2024, to assess ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation in C. catla and L. rohita. All the materials and methods used in this research were carried out following the ethical considerations, as approved by the ethical committee of the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. 90-day-old healthy fish with an average body weight of approximately 20 g (L. rohita) and 22 g (C. catla) were brought from Satiana Fish Hatchery, Faisalabad. These fish were produced under standard nursery rearing conditions involving earthen ponds with supplemental feeding (typically a mixture of rice bran and oil cake) and optimal water quality parameters (temperature 25-30°C, adequate dissolved oxygen and low stocking density to promote faster growth).Fish were acclimatized for 14 days in 70 L glass aquaria, each containing 50 L of dechlorinated water. Ten fish were placed in each aquarium with continuous aeration.

Chemicals and reagents: Ciprofloxacin (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich), acetonitrile, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), HCl, phosphate buffer and HPLC-grade water were used. A ciprofloxacin standard solution (1 mg/mL) was prepared in distilled water containing 0.03% NaOH. A stock solution was prepared by dissolving ciprofloxacin powder in DMSO and diluting to 1000 mL with distilled water. Working solutions were prepared from this stock to obtain the required treatment concentrations.

Acute exposure: Control groups with no antibiotic exposure and treatment groups were made. For L. rohita, the concentration of ciprofloxacin given in T1 was 7.7 mg/L and in T2 was 18 mg/L. Similarly, C. catla in T1 was exposed to a 5.7 mg/L concentration, while the concentration of ciprofloxacin in T2 was 13 mg/L. The experimental concentrations were selected as sublethal exposure levels following the standard toxicological practice of using fractions of reported 96-h LC₅₀values for acute fish exposure studies. Similar mg/L-level ciprofloxacin exposures have also been used in laboratory zebrafish (Danio rerio) toxicity assessment (Ding et al., 2017). Ambili et al. (2013) investigated the toxicity of oxytetracycline in Labeo rohita using mg/L-level exposure concentrations, with a sublethal concentration selected for evaluating physiological and biochemical responses under controlled laboratory conditions.

These concentrations were selected to ensure measurable bioaccumulation over the short duration of the acute trial. These concentrations are several orders of magnitude higher than environmentally relevant levels, which are typically in the ng/L range. Environmentally relevant concentrations are used mostly in chronic trials and are unlikely to produce detectable accumulation during short-term exposure.

Therefore, higher doses were necessary to assess the bioaccumulation potential of ciprofloxacin under controlled acute conditions. Sampling was done after 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, respectively. At the end of the trial, fish were dissected and liver, gills and muscles were carefully separated, placed in polyethylene bags and stored at –20°C until further analysis. The method for sample preparation and chromatographic analysis was adapted from He et al. (2016) with slight modifications.

Sample preparation: Approximately 4 g of homogenized tissue was weighed and taken into 50 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes. A solution of acidified acetonitrile was prepared by mixing acetonitrile with 18% HCl at a ratio of 2500:20 v/v and 20 ml was added to the samples. The mixture was allowed to stand for 15 min at 4°C. The samples were then vortexed for 8 minutes and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 minutes.

The supernatant was collected and transferred to a clean tube and 8 mL of hexane was added for defatting. The mixture was vortexed thoroughly and allowed to separate into two phases. The upper hexane layer was discarded and the lower acetonitrile phase was collected. The extract was then evaporated to near dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen at room temperature. The residue was reconstituted in an appropriate volume of mobile phase, filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane filter and transferred to HPLC vials for analysis.

Chromatographic analysis: Using a 10 μL injection volume, an HPLC separation system consisting of C-18 (4.6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm) was operated at 30°C. At an emission wavelength of 452 nm and an excitation wavelength of 280 nm, the fluorescence detector was run. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (pH 2.5) (20:80 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min.

The analytical method was validated following He et al. (2016). In that study, the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for ciprofloxacin were determined based on signal-to-noise ratios of 3:1 and 10:1, respectively and recovery values from spiked fish tissues were within acceptable limits. The same extraction and chromatographic conditions were applied in the present study, ensuring reliable quantification.

Determination of physico-chemical parameters: Using methods of A.P.H.A. (2012), physicochemical parameters of water were monitored regularly. The temperature was measured with a digital thermometer (Jenway 100 models) by dipping it for 30 seconds. The pH was determined by using the pH micro-process meter (HANNA HI-9023). Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels were measured with a DO meter (HANNA H1-9147). Total hardness was determined by EDTA titration using Erichrome Black-T as an indicator. The following equations for the calculation of physicochemical parameters were adopted from A.P.H.A. (2012):

Total hardness (mgL-1) = ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 1

Where A = mg CaCO3 is equivalent to 1.0 ml EDTA titrant

Carbon dioxide was estimated by titration with sodium carbonate and phenolphthalein as an indicator.

Carbon dioxide (mgL-1) = ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 2

Calcium was estimated using EDTA titration with ammonium purpurate as an indicator.

Calcium (mgL-1) = ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 3

Magnesium was calculated as:

A-B = C, Mg (mgL-1) = ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 4, Where A = Total hardness, B = Calcium×2.5

Total ammonia was determined by spectrophotometry using Nessler’s reagent, measured at 420 nm with a 1 cm light path. A standard calibration curve was constructed under identical temperature and reaction time conditions.

Statistical analysis: Three replicates were used for each treatment, and all tissue analyses were performed in triplicate. A factorial experimental design under Completely Randomized Design (CRD) was used, with tissue bioaccumulation as the dependent variable, while duration and treatment were the independent variables. Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to the obtained bioaccumulation values using Statistix 8.1 (Analytical Software, USA) to determine statistical differences and similarities among variables, followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test to compare treatment means. Different superscript letters indicate a significance level of p  0.05. Physico-chemical parameters of control, T1 and T2 media were also analyzed through correlation studies. Results were shown as Mean ± S.D.

RESULTS

Effect of time duration and ciprofloxacin exposure levels on bioaccumulation: The exposure duration and their interaction significantly (p  0.01) influenced ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation in all organs of both species (Table 1). Low baseline levels were observed in control fish that may be attributed to prior environmental exposure in hatchery conditions. The tissue concentrations of ciprofloxacin increased from day 1 to day 4 in all three organs of L. rohita and C. catla, indicating increased absolute accumulation with increasing exposure concentration as represented in Fig. 1.

 

Table 1. Two-way ANOVA summary for ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation in different organs of L. rohita and C. catla.

 

Species 

Organ

Factor

Df

F-value

L. rohita

Liver

Duration

(3,22)

20559.5**

Treatment

(2,22)

6.3×107**

Duration*Treatment

(6,22)

5828.96**

Gills

Duration

(3,22)

26469.7**

Treatment

(2,22)

4.5×107**

Duration*Treatment

(6,22)

6540.36**

Muscles

Duration

(3,22)

23795.9**

Treatment

(2,22)

2.0×107**

Duration*Treatment

(6,22)

6153.20**

C. catla

Liver

Duration

(3, 22)

15260.1**

Treatment

(2, 22)

8.1×107**

Duration*Treatment

(6, 22)

3427.95**

Gills

Duration

(3, 22)

10992.4**

Treatment

(2,22)

6.6×107**

Duration*Treatment

(6, 22)

3600.93**

Muscles

Duration

(3, 22)

21954.3**

Treatment

(2, 22)

2.7×107**

Duration*Treatment

(6, 22)

5487.52**

** indicates statistical significance at p  0.001.

ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 5

Fig. 1. Mean bioaccumulation (µg/g) of ciprofloxacin in different organs of L. rohita and C. catla after 96-hrs exposure. Values represent Mean ± S.D and different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p  0.05).

 

Pattern of ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation in fish tissues: In this study, three experimental groups of tested fish exhibited significant variations in the bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin in different organs (liver, muscles and gills) throughout a 96-hour exposure period. The ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation pattern as noted above was identical for both low and high doses of ciprofloxacin for 96 hours for both fish in the following order: liver>gills˃muscles. The highest accumulation of ciprofloxacin was observed in the fish liver of both treated groups, with standard accumulation values in fish in the control group, as represented in Tables 2-7 and the Tukey test also revealed that all 3 treatment means and 4 duration means for each of these organs of both fish were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) different from one another, as represented by different superscript letters for these values.

 Table 2. Bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin (µg/g) in the liver of L. rohita during 96-hrs exposure

Duration

Treatments

Duration Mean

Control

T1

T2

After 24-hrs

1.94±0.09j

37.11±0.03h

45.24±0.04d

28.10d

After 48-hrs

1.93±0.07j

37.50±0.08g

45.37±0.06c

28.27c

After 72-hrs

1.96±0.03ij

37.89±0.05f

46.54±0.09b

28.80b

After 96-hrs

1.98±0.06i

38.86±0.04e

46.63±0.07a

29.16a

Treatment Mean ± S.D

1.95±0.02c

37.84±0.50b

45.95±0.74a

28.58

 

 Different superscript letters within Duration * Treatment combinations indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p  0.05), whereas shared letters indicate non-significant differences.

 Superscripts in the final row and final column represent treatment and duration main effects, respectively. The final cell represents the overall grand mean.Table 3. Bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin (µg/g) in the gills of L. rohita during 96-hrs exposure.

Duration

Treatments

Duration Mean

Control

T1

T2

After 24-hrs

1.39±0.05j

31.41±0.07h

40.2±0.08d

24.33d

After 48-hrs

1.41±0.03ij

32.45±0.09g

41.61±0.02c

25.16c

After 72-hrs

1.43±0.06i

32.75±0.05f

42.11±0.04b

25.43b

After 96-hrs

1.44±0.04i

33.20±0.06e

42.45±0.02a

25.70a

Treatment Mean ± S.D

1.42±0.02c

32.45±0.76b

41.59±0.99a

25.15

Different superscript letters within Duration * Treatment combinations indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p  0.05), whereas shared letters indicate non-significant differences. Superscripts in the final row and final column represent treatment and duration main effects, respectively. The final cell represents the overall grand mean.

 Table 4. Bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin (µg/g) in the muscles of L. rohita during 96-hrs exposure

Duration

Treatments

Duration Mean

Control

T1

T2

After 24-hrs

1.11±0.07k

20.25±0.06h

24.23±0.02d

15.20d

After 48-hrs

1.14±0.04j

21.66±0.09g

24.97±0.01c

15.92c

After 72-hrs

1.17±0.01i

21.96±0.05f

25.21±0.04b

16.11b

After 96-hrs

1.19±0.03i

22.11±0.04e

25.90±0.07a

16.40a

Treatment Mean ± S.D

1.15±0.04c

21.49±0.85b

25.08±0.69a

15.91

Different superscript letters within Duration * Treatment combinations indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p  0.05), whereas shared letters indicate non-significant differences. Superscripts in the final row and final column represent treatment and duration main effects, respectively. The final cell represents the overall grand mean.

 Table 5. Bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin (µg/g) in the liver of C. catla during 96-hrs exposure.

Duration

Treatments

Duration Mean

Control

T1

T2

After 24-hrs

2.48±0.05k

47.11±0.08h

50.17±0.03d

33.25d

After 48-hrs

2.48±0.01k

47.73±0.06g

50.68±0.07c

33.63c

After 72-hrs

2.52±0.06j

47.99±0.03f

51.24±0.02b

33.92b

After 96-hrs

2.54±0.08i

48.38±0.04e

51.85±0.04a

34.26a

Treatment Mean ± S.D

2.50±0.03c

47.80±0.53b

50.98±0.72a

33.76

Different superscript letters within Duration * Treatment combinations indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p  0.05), whereas shared letters indicate non-significant differences. Superscripts in the final row and final column represent treatment and duration main effects, respectively. The final cell represents the overall grand mean.

 Table 6. Bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin (µg/g) in the gills of C. catla during 96-hrs exposure.

Duration

Treatments

Duration Mean

Control

T1

T2

After 24-hrs

1.52±0.08k

35.48±0.06h

43.38±0.05d

26.79d

After 48-hrs

1.48±0.03jk

35.65±0.04g

43.74±0.07c

26.96c

After 72-hrs

1.47±0.01j

36.28±0.03f

43.84±0.08b

27.20b

After 96-hrs

1.45±0.07i

36.66±0.02e

44.58±0.03a

27.57a

Treatment Mean ± S.D

1.48±0.02c

36.02±0.54b

43.88±0.50a

27.13

Different superscript letters within Duration * Treatment combinations indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p  0.05), whereas shared letters indicate non-significant differences. Superscripts in the final row and final column represent treatment and duration main effects, respectively. The final cell represents the overall grand mean.

 Table 7. Bioaccumulation of ciprofloxacin (µg/g) in the muscles of C. catla during 96-hrs exposure.

Duration

Treatments

Duration Mean

Control

T1

T2

After 24-hrs

1.22±0.03k

26.55±0.03h

30.16±0.01d

19.31d

After 48-hrs

1.24±0.02jk

26.87±0.02g

30.69±0.04c

19.60c

After 72-hrs

1.27±0.05ij

27.68±0.01f

31.95±0.05b

20.30b

After 96-hrs

1.29±0.01i

27.89±0.04e

32.07±0.03a

20.42a

Treatment Mean ± S.D

1.26±0.03c

27.25±0.64b

31.21±0.94a

19.91

Different superscript letters within Duration * Treatment combinations indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p  0.05), whereas shared letters indicate non-significant differences. Superscripts in the final row and final column represent treatment and duration main effects, respectively. The final cell represents the overall grand mean.

Bioconcentration factor: As a steady state was not achieved during the exposure period, bioconcentration factors (BCF) were calculated using 96-hour tissue concentrations. Both 96-h endpoint BCF and time-weighted average BCF (TWA-BCF) values were determined using the following relationship:

BCF = ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 6

Where, ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 7= Concentration of ciprofloxacin in fish tissues (µg/g)

ASSESSMENT OF BIOACCUMULATION OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN Catla catla AND Labeo rohita EXPOSED IN A LABORATORY-BASED SETUP — Figure 8 = Exposure concentration in water (µg/L)

 TWA-BCF values were derived from concentrations measured at uniform 24-h intervals; therefore, the arithmetic mean of tissue concentrations was considered equivalent to the time-weighted average. The BCF values, as shown in Table 8, were higher in the T1 group than in the T2 group, suggesting reduced bioaccumulation efficiency at elevated concentrations for each of the organs of L. rohita and C. catla. This suggests possible saturation of uptake mechanisms and enhanced elimination at elevated concentrations.

 A limitation of the present study is that steady-state conditions were not achieved within the 96-h exposure period, as tissue concentrations of ciprofloxacin continued to increase. Consequently, bioconcentration factors (BCF) were calculated using 96-h endpoint concentrations and time-weighted average BCFs (TWA-BCF) rather than steady-state values. Additionally, uptake (k₁) and depuration (k₂) rate constants could not be reliably estimated because no depuration phase was conducted. These limitations should be considered when interpreting the bioaccumulation dynamics and longer-term studies incorporating both uptake and depuration phases are recommended for a comprehensive toxicokinetic assessment, as described by Chen et al. (2019) based on a mass balance model (Mackay and Fraser, 2000).

 Table 8. Bioconcentration factors (L/kg) of ciprofloxacin in different tissues of L. rohita and C. catla at the 96-hrs endpoint and as time-weighted average (TWA-BCF) values over the 96-hrs exposure period

Species

Tissue

T1 BCF (96 h)

T2 BCF (96 h)

T1 TWA-BCF

T2 WA-BCF

L. rohita

Liver

5.04

2.59

4.91

2.55

Gills

4.31

2.36

4.21

2.31

Muscles

2.87

1.44

2.79

1.39

C. catla

Liver

8.48

3.99

8.39

3.92

Gills

6.43

3.43

6.32

3.37

Muscles

4.89

2.47

4.78

2.40

 

Physico-chemical parameters of different media for L. rohita and C. catla: Tables 9 and 10 represent the mean values of each parameter noted at the specified interval for the respective media. Key findings suggested that T₂ significantly (P  0.05) influences physicochemical characteristics of water compared to the control and T1, which could have direct implications for fish physiology and survival. In both L. rohita and C. catla, acute exposure to ciprofloxacin resulted in increased temperature, pH, total hardness, carbon dioxide, magnesium and total ammonia from control to T₁ and T₂ media, while dissolved oxygen and calcium levels showed a consistent decline.

 The observed changes followed a consistent dose-dependent pattern (Control≤T₁≤T₂) in both L. rohita and C. catla, suggesting that these variations are primarily associated with ciprofloxacin exposure. Correlation analysis, i.e., Pearson Correlation (Tables 11 and 12), further supports this interpretation, where ammonia, CO₂ and magnesium mostly showed significant (P  0.05) positive correlations with exposure duration and treatment levels, whereas dissolved oxygen and calcium exhibited significant (P  0.05) negative correlations.

Table 9. Mean physico-chemical parameters (Mean ± S.D) of control media, T1 and T2 for L. rohita during acute exposure to ciprofloxacin.

Parameter

Control

T

T

Temperature (oC)

27.99±0.09

28.84±0.35

30.17±0.23

pH

7.44±0.02

7.52±0.03

7.61±0.01

Total Hardness (mg/L)

225.59±0.52

242.30±0.53

260.16±6.08

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)

5.78±0.10

5.56±0.02

5.49±0.02

Carbon Dioxide (mg/L)

1.59±0.02

1.72±0.03

1.84±0.04

Calcium (mg/L)

26.11±0.33

24.59±0.93

23.25±0.36

Magnesium (mg/L)

40.00±0.65

45.05±0.68

48.11±0.64

Total Ammonia (mg/L)

1.21±0.07

1.39±0.09

1.51±0.04

 Table 10. Mean physico-chemical parameters (Mean ± S.D) of control media, T1 and T2 for C. catla during acute exposure to ciprofloxacin.

Parameter

Control

T

T

Temperature (oC)

28.13±0.18

28.94±0.27

30.07±0.36

pH

7.46±0.02

7.53±0.02

7.60±0.03

Total Hardness (mg/L)

225.80±0.94

242.86±6.54

260.63±4.95

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)

5.82±0.03

5.55±0.03

5.50±0.02

Carbon Dioxide (mg/L)

1.60±0.04

1.71±0.05

1.83±0.04

Calcium (mg/L)

26.20±0.26

24.87±1.36

23.53±0.48

Magnesium (mg/L)

39.83±0.45

45.35±0.38

48.25±0.46

Total Ammonia (mg/L)

1.45±0.04

1.56±0.01

1.64±0.02

 Table 11. Pearson’s correlation matrix among physico-chemical parameters and exposure duration in different media for L. rohita.

Duration

Temp.

pH

T.H.

DO

CO2

Ca

Mg

T.A.

Control Medium

Temp.

0.7683ns

1.0000

pH

0.9923**

0.6930ns

1.0000

T.H.

0.9458ns

0.9330ns

0.9012ns

1.0000

DO

-0.9798*

-0.7413ns

-0.9621*

-0.9287ns

1.0000

CO2

0.9891*

0.8059ns

0.9814*

0.9536*

-0.9422ns

1.0000

Ca

0.1102ns

-0.5421ns

0.2050ns

-0.2049ns

-0.1595ns

0.0165ns

1.0000

Mg

-0.4469ns

-0.8005ns

-0.3987ns

-0.6319ns

0.3178ns

-0.5627ns

0.7421ns

1.0000

T.A.

-0.9148ns

-0.9218ns

-0.8576ns

-0.9839*

-0.9330ns

-0.9017ns

0.1974ns

0.5373ns

1.0000

T1 Medium

Temp.

-0.1274ns

1.0000

pH

0.9827*

-0.2799ns

1.0000

T.H.

0.9349ns

-0.4612ns

0.9809*

1.0000

DO

-0.9798*

0.3158ns

-0.9875*

-0.9779*

1.0000

CO2

0.9880*

-0.2084ns

0.9709*

0.9414ns

-0.9911**

1.0000

Ca

-0.9506*

-0.0402ns

-0.8824ns

-0.8103ns

0.9143ns

-0.9601*

1.0000

Mg

0.9692*

-0.3458ns

0.9773*

0.9749*

-0.9983**

0.9895*

-0.9118ns

1.0000

T.A.

0.9959**

-0.0513ns

0.9620*

0.9007ns

-0.9637*

0.9839*

-0.9719*

0.9531*

1.0000

T2 Medium

Temp.

0.2125ns

1.0000

pH

1.0000**

-0.2125ns

1.0000

T.H.

0.9940**

-0.3168ns

0.9940**

1.0000

DO

-0.9827*

0.0613ns

-0.9827*

-0.9584*

1.0000

CO2

1.0000**

-0.2125ns

1.0000**

0.9940**

-0.9827*

1.0000

Ca

-0.9624*

0.0849ns

-0.9624*

-0.9388ns

0.9902**

-0.9624ns

1.0000

Mg

0.9919**

-0.1143ns

0.9919**

0.9767*

-0.9811*

0.9919**

-0.9473ns

1.0000

T.A.

0.9898*

-0.0744ns

0.9898*

0.9694*

-0.9903**

0.9898*

-0.9619*

0.9980**

1.0000

ns = Non-significant (P  0.05); * = Significant (P  0.05); ** = Highly significant (P  0.01). Values represent Pearson’s correlation coefficients.

Table 12. Pearson’s correlation matrix among physico-chemical parameters and exposure duration in different media for C. catla.

Duration

Temp.

pH

T.H.

DO

CO2

Ca

Mg

T.A.

Control Medium

Temp.

0.3545ns

1.0000

pH

0.2911ns

0.8652ns

1.0000

T.H.

-0.6950ns

-0.3303ns

-0.6330ns

1.0000

DO

0.2350ns

0.9428ns

0.6590ns

-0.0203ns

1.0000

CO2

0.7032ns

0.6839ns

0.3139ns

-0.1466ns

0.7626ns

1.0000

Ca

0.9124ns

0.0322ns

-0.1214ns

-0.4166ns

0.0122ns

0.6397ns

1.0000

Mg

0.1101ns

0.3948ns

0.8023ns

-0.7657ns

0.0853ns

-0.2397ns

-0.2620ns

1.0000

T.A.

-0.8183ns

-0.7421ns

-0.4764ns

0.3903ns

-0.7350ns

-0.9674*

-0.6786ns

0.0114ns

1.0000

T1 Medium

Temp.

0.8123ns

1.0000

pH

0.4152ns

0.1217ns

1.0000

T.H.

0.9922**

0.8657ns

0.3150ns

1.0000

DO

-0.9898*

-0.7785ns

-0.3143ns

-0.9872*

1.0000

CO2

0.9827*

0.8313ns

0.5336ns

0.9683*

-0.9463ns

1.0000

Ca

-0.9620*

-0.8535ns

-0.5562ns

-0.9498ns

0.9137ns

-0.9953**

1.0000

Mg

0.9684*

0.9319ns

0.3006ns

0.9872*

-0.9492ns

0.9638*

-0.9596*

1.0000

T.A.

0.9738*

0.9016ns

0.2302ns

0.9946**

-0.9726*

0.9457ns

-0.9297ns

0.9917**

1.0000

T2 Medium

Temp.

-0.7396ns

1.0000

pH

0.8000ns

-0.3281ns

1.0000

T.H.

0.9847*

-0.8434ns

0.7358ns

1.0000

DO

-0.9827*

0.6075ns

-0.8315ns

-0.9356ns

1.0000

CO2

0.9544*

-0.7165ns

0.8928ns

0.9523*

-0.9193ns

1.0000

Ca

-0.9841*

0.8274ns

-0.6846ns

-0.9911**

0.9460ns

-0.9122ns

1.0000

Mg

0.9616*

-0.7324ns

0.6329ns

0.9433ns

-0.9538*

0.8369ns

-0.9778*

1.0000

T.A.

1.0000**

-0.7396ns

0.8000ns

0.9847*

-0.9827*

0.9544*

-0.9841*

0.9616*

1.0000

ns = Non-significant (P  0.05); * = Significant (P  0.05); ** = Highly significant (P  0.01). Values represent Pearson’s correlation coefficients.

 DISCUSSION

 Antibiotic residues are the major concern in the aquatic environment, whether marine or freshwater. According to Li et al. (2021), the concentrations of the majority of antibiotics in freshwater cultured products were at a medium or lower level, but they were slightly greater compared to those found in marine cultured products. In muscle tissues, the highest ciprofloxacin concentration was 1900 ng/g ww and it was above the maximum allowable residue of 100 ng/g ww.

 According to Han et al. (2021), in the marine aquaculture farms surrounding Laizhou Bay, Bohai Sea, fluoroquinolones were the most common antibiotics in organisms and culture sediments/biofilms. Ciprofloxacin was observed to accumulate more in the summer than in the winter. Zhang et al. (2020a) assessed that adsorption capacity to particles and comparatively high aqueous solubility are the reasons for the high bioaccumulation factors of fluoroquinolones in fish. Zhang et al. (2022) evaluated that the key factor impacting the bioaccumulation of antibiotics in organism samples is biotransformation. The ability of parent pollutants to accumulate in organisms is decreasing as their biotransformation becomes more advanced. Zhao et al. (2018) also confirmed that in organisms, enrofloxacin can be metabolized into ciprofloxacin and then in muscle, there was a significant positive correlation between enrofloxacin and its metabolite, ciprofloxacin (p  0.05). Consequently, the reduction in enrofloxacin's ability to accumulate is due to its biotransformation into ciprofloxacin.

 Tang et al. (2022) also determined that antibiotic metabolic biotransformation is a major factor in the biomagnification of antibiotics. Only ciprofloxacin exhibited notable trophic magnification (TMF=1.95) in comparison to other antibiotics. It was found that among omnivore fish, common carp, ciprofloxacin had the highest log BAF value (4.73±0.30) and each antibiotic's BAF in aquatic biota was affected by the route of exposure and bioaccumulation kinetics in addition to its pH-dependent distribution coefficient. Antibiotic bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) in benthic biota were found to be higher than in fish, suggesting that ingesting sediment could be a potential route of antibiotic exposure.

 This study found higher ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation in C. catla compared to L. rohita due to species differences and it was increased at high antibiotic concentrations. Additionally, physiological differences in uptake and excretion may enhance accumulation in C. catla. These findings are justified by the study of Chen et al. (2018) that one of the key variables influencing the distribution of antibiotics in various tissues of cultured fish is species. Grass carp had high antibiotic levels in fish tissue samples, indicating ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin showed high transportability from the plasma into the tissues, while tilapia, crucian carp, mud carp and mugilidae had low antibiotic concentrations, indicating relatively low transportability from the plasma into the tissues. The distribution of antibiotics in fish tissues may also be influenced by environmental factors, animal excrement and nutrition. Furthermore, Zhang et al. (2020a) evaluated that besides the lipid contents in fish and the concentration of pollutants in water, the bioaccumulation of pollutants in fish tissues can be influenced by a wide range of factors, including the species of fish, size and weight.

 In the present study, it was found that bioaccumulation values were different from one another in each organ. The highest ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation after 96 hours (T2) occurred in the liver of both L. rohita (45.95±0.74 µg/g) and C. catla (50.98±0.72 µg/g) due to high transformation rates, as it is the main metabolic organ, while the least bioaccumulation occurred in the muscles of both L. rohita (25.08±0.69 µg/g) and C. catla (31.21±0.94 µg/g) due to a lower uptake rate. As a result, the values of the time-weighted average bioconcentration factor (TWA-BCF) were higher for the liver of L. rohita (T1 4.91; T2 2.55) than for the muscles (T1 2.79; T2 1.39). Similarly, these values were higher for T1 (8.39) and T2 (3.92) of the liver than the muscles (T1 4.78; T2 2.40) of C. catla. Chen et al. (2018) and Chen et al. (2019) also assessed that the value of the bioconcentration factor for fluoroquinolones was highest for the liver (0.24-39.55 L/kg) and lowest for muscles (0.04-1.07 L/kg). This difference is most likely caused by high detoxification and digestion of the targeted antibiotics in the liver and bile, while the muscles have a low potential for bioaccumulation, high depuration rates and low uptake rates.

 The main finding of this study was that the observed pattern of ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation was as follows: liver˃gills˃muscles. Zhang et al. (2021) and Zhang et al. (2022) confirmed these results that in lipid-rich tissues (fish liver) or respiratory organs (fish gill), antibiotics showed a higher bioaccumulation capacity than in muscle. Xie et al. (2017) also reported the tissue distribution in seven fish species, including carps from Taihu Lake and observed that the concentration of ciprofloxacin in the liver (BAFs=2008 L/kg) was generally higher, followed by the gills (BAFs=811 L/kg) and muscle (BAFs=545 L/kg). This is because the liver functions as the main site where xenobiotic metabolism occurs.

 The least bioaccumulation in fish muscles is also due to the exposure route, which was given through water, not feed. Shiroma et al. (2021) assessed that the highest value of florfenicol concentration in tilapia muscle was 0.92 μg/g only. It suggested that the drug was either rapidly absorbed and eliminated from the fish with little chance of accumulation in the muscle when exposed to water. This is likely because the exposure occurred directly on the skin and gills rather than through the feed. Liu et al. (2018) determined that because of their large mass, muscles with relatively low antibiotic concentrations may nevertheless be relevant for bioaccumulation. Although the bioaccumulation pattern observed in this study (liver>gills>muscles) aligns with previous reports, the absolute concentrations are considerably higher due to the elevated experimental exposure levels employed.

 According to Zhang et al. (2020b), physico-chemical parameters greatly influence the bioaccumulation of pharmaceuticals, as significant positive correlations were observed between bioaccumulation factors for quinolones and dissolved oxygen and water temperature, while negative correlations were observed with chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen and total phosphorus. Naz et al. (2012) evaluated that the dissolved oxygen contents of the test media with a metal mixture decreased significantly due to enhanced excretion of ammonia by the fish. Similarly, the present study assessed that there was a significant increase in ammonia due to metabolic and antibiotic-induced stress during acute ciprofloxacin exposure, resulting in increased temperature and decreased dissolved oxygen.

 The physico-chemical parameters observed in the present study were within ranges reported for Indian major carp habitats. Ojha et al. (2019) documented water quality parameters from micro-watersheds of southern Rajasthan, where temperature ranged from ~28.6 to 33.8°C, pH from 7.3 to 10.8, dissolved oxygen from 6.05 to 17.0 mg/L, total alkalinity from 21 to 120 mg/L, total hardness from 112 to 172 mg/L and ammonia from 0 to 0.45 mg/L. In comparison, the present study recorded temperature (~28-30°C) and pH (~7.4-7.6) well within these reported limits. Dissolved oxygen values (~5.4-5.8 mg/L), although slightly lower, remained above the minimum threshold required for carp survival. Total hardness values (~225-260 mg/L) were somewhat higher than those reported, while ammonia levels (~1.2-1.6 mg/L) exceeded the field values but remained within sublethal limits under controlled laboratory conditions. These comparisons indicate that, despite some variation under experimental exposure, the water quality remained within physiologically tolerable limits for L. rohita and C. catla. Karim et al. (2024) also assessed that physico-chemical parameters of four stations from River Zhob, including pH, dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids, air and water temperature, were within the optimum range for macro-invertebrate development and growth.

Conclusion: Acute exposure of ciprofloxacin to L. rohita and C. catla was given through water for 96 hours. Chromatographic analysis revealed that ciprofloxacin concentrations were bioaccumulated in both fish tissues. In both L. rohita and C. catla, the pattern of ciprofloxacin bioaccumulation was similar, as the highest bioaccumulation occurred in the liver, followed by the gills and muscles. However, C. catla showed a greater antibiotic bioaccumulation trend than L. rohita. These findings highlight species-specific differences in accumulation and provide a basis for future studies investigating long-term exposure and bioaccumulation mechanisms under environmentally relevant conditions.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or non-financial, professional, or personal conflicts that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical statement: This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations from the ethical committee of the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, under ethical approval No. 5749-52 dated 8 March 2024.

Authors contribution: Neelam Arshad conducted the laboratory experiments, data collection, statistical analysis and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript as well as critical revisions. Sajid Abdullah supervised the study and provided guidance on experimental design. Moazzam Ali contributed to the literature review, formatting and manuscript editing. Humaira Arshad assisted in data analysis, interpretation and organization. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

REFERENCES

A.P.H.A. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd Ed. American Public Health Association; New York. 1360 p https://www.standardmethods.org/doi/book/10.2105/smww.2882

Ambili, T. R., M. Saravanan, M. Ramesh, D. B. Abhijith and R. K. Poopal (2013). Toxicological effects of the antibiotic oxytetracycline to an Indian major carp Labeo rohita. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 64(3): 494-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-012-9836-6

Chen, H., S. Liu, X.R. Xu, Z.H. Diao, K.F. Sun, Q.W. Hao, S.S. Liu and G.G. Ying (2018). Tissue distribution, bioaccumulation characteristics and health risk of antibiotics in cultured fish from a typical aquaculture area. J. Hazard. Mater. 343: 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.017

Chen, M., H. Zhao, Y. Wang, T.G. Bekele, W. Liu and J. Chen (2019). Uptake and depuration of eight fluoroquinolones (FQs) in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 180: 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.04.075

De-Assis, H.C.S. (2021). Pharmaceutical pollutants. Aquaculture Toxicology. Academic Press; UK. 107-131 p https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821337-7.00008-6

Ding, L., L. Zang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Ai, N. Ding and H. Wang (2017). Joint toxicity of fluoroquinolone and tetracycline antibiotics to zebrafish (Danio rerio) based on biochemical biomarkers and histopathological observation. J. Toxicol. Sci. 42(3): 267-280. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.42.267

FAO (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en

Han, Q.F., X.R. Zhang, X.Y. Xu, X.L. Wang, X.Z. Yuan, Z.J. Ding, S. Zhao and S.G. Wang (2021). Antibiotics in marine aquaculture farms surrounding Laizhou Bay, Bohai Sea: Distribution characteristics considering various culture modes and organism species. Sci. Total Environ. 760: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143863

He, X., M. Deng, Q. Wang, Y. Yang, Y. Yang and X. Nie (2016). Residues and health risk assessment of quinolones and sulfonamides in cultured fish from Pearl River Delta, China. Aquaculture 458: 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.006

Kibenge, F.S. (2022). Descriptions of major farmed aquatic animal species. Aquaculture Pathophysiology. Academic Press; UK. 1-44 p https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812211-2.00041-X

Karim, A., B. Hafeeza, S. Riaz, S. Khwaja, M.M. Shahzad and A. Akhter. (2024). Assessment of aquatic macro-invertebrates communities and water quality parameters of River Zhob, Balochistan, Pakistan. Braz. J. Biol. 84: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.265234

Li, J.Y., J. Wen, Y. Chen, Q. Wang and J. Yin (2021). Antibiotics in cultured freshwater products in Eastern China: Occurrence, human health risks, sources and bioaccumulation potential. Chemosphere 264(Part 1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128441

Liu, S., T.G. Bekele, H. Zhao, X. Cai and J. Chen (2018). Bioaccumulation and tissue distribution of antibiotics in wild marine fish from Laizhou Bay, North China. Sci. Total Environ. 631-632: 1398-1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.139

Liu, Y., X. Ai, R. Sun, Y. Yang, S. Zhou, J. Dong and Q. Yang (2022). Residue, biotransformation, risk assessment and withdrawal time of enrofloxacin in red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Chemosphere 307(Part 1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135657

Masood, Z., Z. Hasan, H. Gul, H. Zahid, H.U. Hassan, R. Sultan, W. Khan, Safia, K. Titus and A. Ullah (2022). Monitoring pond water quality to improve the production of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) in Bannu Fish Hatchery of Bannu district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province; An Implications for artificial fish culture. Brazilian J. Biol. 83: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.245197

Mackay, D. and A. Fraser (2000). Bioaccumulation of persistent organic chemicals: mechanisms and models. Environ. Pollut. 110(3): 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00162-7

Naz, S., M. Javed, A. Tahir and H. Azmat (2012). Impact of physico-chemical variables of test media on growth performance of metal stressed major carps. Pak. J. Zool. 44(5): 1291-1296.

Ojha, M.L., A.K. Suman, V.P. Saini and S.R. Surnar (2019). Effect of physico-chemical and biological parameters on growth of Indian major carps in micro watershed of southern Rajasthan. Indian J. Ecol. 46(3): 657-661.

Shiroma, L.S., C.B.G. Bottoli, C.M. Jonsson and S.C. Queiroz (2021). Exposure of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to the antibiotic florfenicol in water: Determination of the bioconcentration factor and the withdrawal period. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(29): 39026-39034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13327-5

Sun, Y., L. Zhang, X. Zhang, T. Chen, D. Dong, X. Hua and Z. Guo. (2020). Enhanced bioaccumulation of fluorinated antibiotics in crucian carp (Carassius carassius): Influence of fluorine substituent. Sci. Total Environ. 748: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141567

Tacon, A.G. (2020). Trends in global aquaculture and aquafeed production: 2000–2017. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 28(1): 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1649634

Tang, J., S. Wang, Y. Tai, N.F. Tam, L. Su, Y. Shi, B. Luo, R. Tao, Y. Yang and X. Zhang (2020). Evaluation of factors influencing annual occurrence, bioaccumulation and biomagnification of antibiotics in planktonic food webs of a large subtropical river in South China. Water Res. 170: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115302

Tang, J., J. Zhang, L. Su, Y. Jia and Y. Yang (2022). Bioavailability and trophic magnification of antibiotics in aquatic food webs of Pearl River, China: Influence of physicochemical characteristics and biotransformation. Sci. Total Environ. 820: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153285

Xie, Z., G. Lu, Z. Yan, J. Liu, P. Wang and Y. Wang (2017). Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of pharmaceuticals in food webs from a large freshwater lake. Environ. Pollut. 222: 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.026

Zhang, R., K. Yu, A. Li, Y. Wang, C. Pan and X. Huang (2020a). Antibiotics in coral reef fishes from the South China Sea: Occurrence, distribution, bioaccumulation and dietary exposure risk to human. Sci. Total Environ. 704: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135288

Zhang, L., S. Qin, L. Shen, S. Li, J. Cui and Y. Liu (2020b). Bioaccumulation, trophic transfer and human health risk of quinolones antibiotics in the benthic food web from a macrophyte-dominated shallow lake, North China. Sci. Total Environ. 712: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136557

Zhang, X., J. Zhang, Q. Han, X. Wang, S. Wang, X. Yuan, B. Zhang and S. Zhao (2021). Antibiotics in mariculture organisms of different growth stages: Tissue-specific bioaccumulation and influencing factors. Environ. Pollut. 288: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117715

Zhang, J., X. Zhang, T. Hu, X. Xu, D. Zhao, X. Wang, L. Li, X. Yuan, C. Song and S. Zhao (2022). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and antibiotics in oil-contaminated aquaculture areas: Bioaccumulation, influencing factors, and human health risks. J. Hazard. Mater. 437: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129365

Zhao, H., W. Quan, T.G. Bekele, M. Chen, X. Zhang and B. Qu (2018). Effect of copper on the accumulation and elimination kinetics of fluoroquinolones in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 156: 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.025

Converted to HTML with WordToHTML.net | Document Converter for Windows



Download Statistics
This Manuscript
Full Text
27
downloads
Indicators
Metrics

Impact Score: 0.65; h Index:51

SJR: 0.20

Indexing
Status

Web of Science (SCIE): Q3

SCOPUS (Q3)

Journal Metrics
Current

Journal Impact Factor (JIF): 0.6; JCR 2026 ; Five Year JIF: 0.7

HEC Category: W

ISSN Details
Verified

Print ISSN: 1018-7081

Electronic ISSN: 2309-8694

Search the Journal

Use the fields below to search for articles by Title, Author, or Keywords.

All Downloads
Full Text
292,543
downloads
Supplementary
1,083
downloads