INTRODUCTION
Rice weevilSitophilus oryzae is a major stored-grain pest worldwide and causes serious damage to stored products, including wheat, rice, sorghum, beans, dried fruits and medicinal herbs (Gyawali et al., 2026). Infestation by S. oryzae increases grain moisture, the proportion of insect-damaged kernels and powder accumulation, while reducing thousand-grain weight and overall grain quality; heavily infested wheat can become mouldy, clumped and unsuitable for consumption (Lougraimzi et al., 2018; Ahmad et al., 2017). Insecticides are vital to modern agriculture because they effectively suppress pest populations, reduce insect-induced crop losses, and ensure stable crop yields and food supply. Nevertheless, their drawbacks including insect resistance, non-target toxicity and environmental contamination have led to the replacement of traditional insecticides with safer and high-efficiency substitutes (Zakaria and Zuharah, 2025; Nguyen et al., 2015). Therefore, efficient, safe and environmentally benign grain fumigants and protectants are urgently needed. Plant essential oils act as semiochemicals and can exert multiple effects on insects, including fumigant and contact toxicity (Sheikh et al., 2024). They rapidly penetrate the insect cuticle and act on physiological targets, altering the activities of ALP and GOT and ultimately causing mortality inpests.(Gaire et al., 2019; Omar et al., 2024). Given their degradable nature, limited environmental persistence and low resistance‑inducing risk, plant essential oils possess great practical potential for controlling stored grain insects (Yallappa et al., 2025; Vendan et al., 2017).
Acorus gramineus is a perennial herb in the genus Acorus. It grows in wet habitats, including stream banks and rocky areas at elevations below 1800 m a.s.l. and is cultivated widely for medicinal use (Ryuk et al., 2014). Extracts of A. gramineus have shown insecticidal activity. For example, the methanol extract of A. gramineus rhizomes caused an 83.00% corrected mortality rate in S. oryzae and Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae; Linnaeus, 1758) after 48 h at 3.5 mg/cm2 in a filter-paper diffusion assay (Kim et al., 2003). In another study, n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and water extracts of A. gramineus rhizomes caused corrected mortality rates of 83.00% in S. oryzae, 100% in C. chinensis and 57% in Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Ptinidae; Fabricius, 1792) after 48 h at 0.51 mg/cm2 (Kim et al., 2003). The n-hexane extract of A. gramineus was active against S. oryzae, C. chinensis and L. serricorne, with corrected mortality rates of 100%, 100% and 57%, respectively, after 48 h at 0.51 mg/cm2 (Kim et al., 2003). Acorus gramineus n-hexane extract has also shown activity against larvae of Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae; Meigen, 1826), larvae of Boophilus microplus (Ixodida: Ixodidae; Canestrini, 1887) and adults of Ornithodoros moubata (Ixodida: Argasidae; Murray, 1877), whereas an aqueous decoction of A. gramineus was active against Ascaris suum (Ascaridida: Ascarididae; Goeze, 1782) (Perrett and Whitfield, 1995).
Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Linnaeus, 1753) is an aromatic herb in the genus Rosmarinus. It is native to Europe and the Mediterranean coast of North Africa and has been introduced into China. The plant is used as a source of aromatic oil for soap and cosmetic fragrances and is also grown as an ornamental species (Peng et al., 2005). Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil has shown fumigant activity, with LD50 values of 43.00 and 19.28 μL/L after 12 and 24 h, respectively. At 10 μL/mL, the oil showed repellent activity against adults of Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae; Glover, 1877) (Koorki, 2018). In addition, R. officinalis oil showed 24- and 48-h fumigant LD50 values of 222.82 and 55.79 μL/L, respectively, against Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae; Linnaeus, 1758) (Ramzi et al., 2022). These findings indicate that A. gramineus and R. officinalis oils contain insecticidal constituents. In preliminary screening of 26 plant essential oils, we found that A. gramineus oil had strong contact toxicity against S. oryzae. When the LD30 dose of A. gramineus oil was mixed with the LD30 doses of other oils, the combination with R. officinalis oil showed a strong synergistic effect. Therefore, we analysed the chemical composition of A. gramineus and R. officinalis oils by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and used a compound-elimination assay to identify their active constituents. We evaluated the activity of the active-constituent mixture. These results provide a basis for developing A. gramineus and R. officinalis oil resources for the control of S. oryzae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test materials: Twenty-six plant samples were identified by Professor Du Fan from the Botany Teaching and Research Office, College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University. The scientific names, family names, collection locations and plant parts used are listed in Table 1. Samples were collected from July to October 2021.
Chemical reagents: β-asarone (≥98%), isoeugenol methyl ether (≥98%), aristolone (≥98%), eucalyptol (≥99%), eucalyptol (≥96%) and L(-)-borneol (≥98%) were purchased from Shanghai Yuan Ye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Patchouli alcohol (≥98%) was purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. n-Hexane of analytical grade was purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory.
Instruments and equipment: The instruments used in this study included an HP7890A-5975C gas chromatography-mass spectrometry system (Agilent Technologies, USA), a constant-temperature incubator (Shanghai Kuntian Experimental Instrument Co., Ltd.), an electric heating mantle (Shanghai Lichen Co., Ltd.) and a micropipette (Shanghai Dalong Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.).
Extraction of plant essential oils: Essential oils from the 26 plant samples were extracted according to Method A in Appendix XD of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Each sample was placed in a 1 L round-bottom flask, and 300-500 mL of water was added. The flask was fitted with a volatile-oil extractor and a reflux condenser and heated with an electric heating mantle for 5-6 h until no further increase in oil volume was observed. The oil phase was collected, freeze-dried and stored under refrigeration (4℃) until use.
Determination of essential-oil components: Chemical components were analysed using an HP7890A-5975C gas chromatography-mass spectrometry system equipped with a quartz capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). The oven temperature was held at 100 °C for 2 min, increased to 250 °C at 4 °C/min and then held at 250 °C for 10 min. The injector temperature was 250 °C, the column pressure was 100 kPa, the injection volume was 0.2 L, the split ratio was 100:1 and helium was used as the carrier gas at 1.2 mL/min.
Mass spectrometry conditions: The ion source was operated in electron-impact mode at 70 eV. The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry interface, ion source and quadrupole temperatures were 280, 230 and 150 °C, respectively. The electron multiplier voltage was 1894 V. Compounds were identified by comparison with the Wiley 7n.l standard mass spectral library, and relative contents were calculated by peak-area normalization.
Table 1 Scientific names, collection sites and plant parts of the tested plant samples.
|
No.
|
Scientific name
|
Family
|
Collection location
|
Parts
|
|
1
|
Acorus gramineus (Acorales: Acoraceae; Aiton, 1789)
|
Acoraceae
|
33°30′N, 116°53′E
|
root
|
|
2
|
Angelica sinensis (Apiales: Apiaceae; Diels, 1900)
|
Apiaceae
|
34°26′N, 104°02′E
|
root
|
|
3
|
Foeniculum vulgare (Apiales: Apiaceae; Miller, 1768)
|
Apiaceae
|
26°86′N, 100°25′E
|
fruit
|
|
4
|
Notopterygium incisum (Apiales: Apiaceae; H.T.Chang, 1975)
|
Apiaceae
|
30°54′N, 02°32′E
|
root and stock
|
|
5
|
Asarum heterotropoides (Piperales: Aristolochiaceae; F.Schmidt, 1868)
|
Aristolochiaceae
|
40°44′N, 124°47′E
|
root
|
|
6
|
Artemisia argyi (Asterales: Asteraceae; H.Leveille & Vaniot, 1910)
|
Asteraceae
|
25°23′N, 102°20′E
|
leaf
|
|
7
|
Nardostachys jatamansi (Dipsacales: Caprifoliaceae; de Candolle, 1830)
|
Caprifoliaceae
|
22°50′N, 110°10′E
|
herb
|
|
8
|
Caryopteris forrestii (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Diels, 1912)
|
Lamiaceae
|
28°17′N, 98°52′E
|
aerial part
|
|
9
|
Mosla chinensis (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Maximowicz, 1883)
|
Lamiaceae
|
25°20′N, 102°10′E
|
leaf
|
|
10
|
Mentha canadensis (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Linnaeus, 1753)
|
Lamiaceae
|
25°23′N, 102°20′E
|
stem and leaf
|
|
11
|
Nepeta cataria (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Linnaeus, 1753)
|
Lamiaceae
|
35°26′N 118°22′E
|
ear
|
|
12
|
Pogostemon cablin (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Bentham, 1848)
|
Lamiaceae
|
18°50′N, 110°20′E
|
stem and leaf
|
|
13
|
Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Linnaeus, 1753)
|
Lamiaceae
|
25°4′N, 102°27′E
|
aerial part
|
|
14
|
Cinnamomum cassia (Laurales: Lauraceae; J.Presl, 1825)
|
Lauraceae
|
25°5′N, 99°6′E
|
bark
|
|
15
|
Yulania biondii (Magnoliales: Magnoliaceae; D.L.Fu, 2001)
|
Magnoliaceae
|
33°29′N, 112°26′E
|
bud
|
|
16
|
Myristica fragrans (Magnoliales: Myristicaceae; Houttuyn, 1774)
|
Myristicaceae
|
23°25′N, 115°50′E
|
kernel
|
|
17
|
Syzygium aromaticum (Myrtales: Myrtaceae; Merrill & L.M.Perry, 1939)
|
Myrtaceae
|
23°15′N, 109°11′E
|
bud
|
|
18
|
Cymbopogon citratus (Poales: Poaceae; Stapf, 1906)
|
Poaceae
|
21°54′N, 101°32′E
|
aerial part
|
|
19
|
Citrus aurantium (Sapindales: Rutaceae; Linnaeus, 1753)
|
Rutaceae
|
33°9′N, 107°20′E
|
fruit
|
|
20
|
Zanthoxylum bungeanum (Sapindales: Rutaceae; Maximowicz, 1871)
|
Rutaceae
|
29°23′N, 102°42′E
|
fruit
|
|
21
|
Illicium verum (Austrobaileyales: Schisandraceae; Hooker, 1888)
|
Schisandraceae
|
23°53′N, 105°40′E
|
fruit
|
|
22
|
Amomum villosum (Zingiberales: Zingiberaceae; Loureiro, 1790)
|
Zingiberaceae
|
22°5′N, 107°2′E
|
fruit
|
|
23
|
Amomum kravanh (Zingiberales: Zingiberaceae; Gagnepain, 1906)
|
Zingiberaceae
|
30°43′N, 103°32′E
|
fruit
|
|
24
|
Curcuma longa (Zingiberales: Zingiberaceae; Linnaeus, 1753)
|
Zingiberaceae
|
24°45′N, 104°11′E
|
root
|
|
25
|
Curcuma phaeocaulis (Zingiberales: Zingiberaceae; Valeton, 1918)
|
Zingiberaceae
|
22°24′N, 109°17′E
|
root
|
|
26
|
Zingiber officinale (Zingiberales: Zingiberaceae; Roscoe, 1807)
|
Zingiberaceae
|
24°50′N, 104°23′E
|
root
|
Rearing of S. oryzae: The test insects were maintained in an incubator at 26-28 °C, 65-75% relative humidity and a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. The insects were reared on rice. Adults were removed after 7 days, and newly emerged adults were collected 1-2 weeks later for bioassays.
Contact-toxicity assay: Contact toxicity against S. oryzae was determined using the method described by Sang et al. (2023) and Fang et al. (2010), with n-hexane as the solvent. Test concendtrations were selected on the basis of preliminary assays. Using a microsyringe, 0.50 μL of eacdh test solution was applied to the dorsal thoracic plate of each adult insect. Ten insects were used poer replicate, and each treatment was replicated five times. Treated insects were maintained in an iprncubator, with n-hexane as the negative control and cypermethrin as the positive control. Survival was recorded after 24 h. Mortality and corrected mortality were calculated using formulas (1) and (2). LD50 values were estimated by probit regression in IBM SPSS 25.0 (LD₅₀ values, along with their 95% confidence intervals and standard errors, were estimated by probit regression using IBM SPSS 25.0. Concentration data were log₁₀-transformed prior to modelling. Pearson’s chi-square test was applied to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of the probit model at a significance level of α = 0.05).
(1)
Correction of mortality rate
(2)
In these formulas, Nl is the number of dead insects, Nm is the total number of insects in the treatment group, No is the mortality rate of the treatment group and Np is the mortality rate of the control group.
Binary mixtures of A. gramineus oil with the other 25 essential oils: The synergistic effects of A. gramineus oil mixed with each of the other 25 essential oils were evaluated according to Abbassy et al. (2009) and Dhinakaran et al. (2019). LD30 solutions were prepared for each essential oil. The corrected contact mortality of each individual oil against S. oryzae and that of each binary mixture were determined. The co-toxicity factor (CTF) was calculated using formula (3).
CTF=
(3)
In formula (3), the expected corrected mortality is the sum of the corrected mortality rates of the two individual oils. A CTF value of 20 or greater indicates synergism, a value between -20 and 20 indicates an additive effect, and a value of -20 or lower indicates antagonism.
Compound-elimination assay for the main constituents of A. gramineus and R. officinalis oils: The contribution of major constituents to contact toxicity against S. oryzae was evaluated according to Kim et al. (2021) and Yeom et al. (2012). Compounds present at more than 3% in A. gramineus or R. officinalis oils were mixed according to their natural proportions. For A. gramineus oil, the following treatments were prepared: the LD90 concentration of the whole oil (15.89 μg/adult); an LD90 mixed-constituent solution containing isoeugenol methyl ether, β-asarone and aristolone at a natural ratio of 14.04:69.94:5.14; and mixed-constituent solutions in which isoeugenol methyl ether, β-asarone or aristolone was omitted. For R.officinalis oil, the following treatments were prepared: the LD90 concentration of the whole oil (454.23 μg/adult); an LD90 mixed-constituent solution containing eucalyptol, (+)-2-bornanone, L(-)-borneol and patchouli alcohol at a natural ratio of 8.63:5.56:4.49:64.33; and mixed-constituent solutions in which eucalyptol, (+)-2-bornanone, L(-)-borneol or patchouli alcohol was omitted. Each treatment was tested as described in the contact-toxicity assay.
Binary mixture of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol: The combined lethal effect of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol against S. oryzae was evaluated according to Chen et al. (2021) and Jiang et al. (2021). The two compounds were mixed at different volume ratios, and the expected LD50 value and synergistic ratio were calculated using formulas (4) and (5).
(4)
(5)
RESULTS
The LD30 and LD50 values for the contact toxicity of the 26 plant essential oils against S. oryzae are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Contact toxicity of 26 essential oils against S. oryzae.
|
Treatment
|
LD30 (95% CI)/μg·adult-1
|
LD50 (95% CI)/μg·adult-1
|
Slope ± SE
|
χ2
|
P value
|
|
A. gramineus
|
2.28(0.86~3.56)
|
4.01(2.21-5.76)
|
2.14±0.20
|
6.98
|
0.073
|
|
A. sinensis
|
5.54(4.93~6.12)
|
7.59(6.89 ~ 8.35)
|
3.83±0.29
|
1.70
|
0.638
|
|
P. cablin
|
8.41(6.88~10.00)
|
12.93(10.92~15.35)
|
2.81±0.27
|
2.69
|
0.442
|
|
C. cassia
|
14.57(13.06~15.67)
|
16.13(14.86 ~17.13)
|
11.88±1.61
|
0.95
|
0.813
|
|
M. chinensis
|
11.85(3.62~23.41)
|
20.56(10.63-72.73)
|
2.19±0.18
|
22.33
|
0.000
|
|
M. canadensis
|
12.94(4.06~34.70)
|
22.32(8.62~65.93)
|
2.22±0.18
|
18.65
|
0.000
|
|
S. aromaticum
|
18.08(15.43~20.82)
|
24.48(21.27~28.57)
|
3.98±0.45
|
0.04
|
0.998
|
|
A. heteropoides
|
21.76(18.85~24.37)
|
29.51(26.53~32.53)
|
3.96±0.37
|
0.33
|
0.954
|
|
M. fragrans
|
18.66(1.37~53.93)
|
34.67(7.53~154.37)
|
1.95±0.15
|
28.13
|
0.000
|
|
N. cataria
|
32.17(7.27~69.04)
|
54.20(21.22~152.96)
|
2.32±0.20
|
17.90
|
0.000
|
|
C. forrestii
|
30.29(0.60~24.55)
|
59.94 (10.00~998.78)
|
1.77±0.14
|
33.94
|
0.000
|
|
C. longa
|
30.67(0.00~332.96)
|
66.09(2.97~8.466539729)
|
1.57±0.13
|
45.33
|
0.000
|
|
N. incisum
|
24.56(0.05~296.16)
|
72.88(6.74~49436.08)
|
1.11±0.10
|
31.00
|
0.000
|
|
Z. bungeanum
|
63.11(36.85~89.42)
|
90.68(62.00~138.55)
|
3.33±0.37
|
5.80
|
0.122
|
|
A. kravanh
|
53.23(12.84~142.42)
|
121.98(47.15~567.68)
|
1.46±0.13
|
14.91
|
0.002
|
|
C. citratus
|
56.45(4.71~219.59)
|
123.43 (33.48~1750.20)
|
1.54±0.13
|
24.04
|
0.000
|
|
A. villosum
|
66.07(0.01~493.82)
|
130.94(17.79~803890.24)
|
1.77±0.16
|
34.59
|
0.000
|
|
F. vulgare
|
100.18(72.56~127.32)
|
145.39(113.58~189.02)
|
3.24±0.25
|
5.98
|
0.113
|
|
Z. officinale
|
59.36(0.08~1763.73)
|
153.63 (26.20~9.50E+8)
|
1.27±0.12
|
32.70
|
0.000
|
|
I. verum
|
58.76(0.40~602.31)
|
161.27(31.60~704380.61)
|
1.20±0.11
|
27.22
|
0.000
|
|
R. officinalis
|
107.35(12.35~247.58)
|
163.20 (52.38~657.10)
|
2.88±0.27
|
21.89
|
0.000
|
|
Y. biondii
|
127.78(115.17~140.27)
|
166.18(151.18~185.89)
|
4.60±0.53
|
1.39
|
0.707
|
|
C. phaeocaulis
|
26.36(0.00~95373.88)
|
193.29(33.68~9.73E+43)
|
1.30±0.12
|
32.32
|
0.000
|
|
N. jatamansi
|
138.40(0.00~333.43)
|
195.01(39.29~2.70E+12)
|
4.42±0.38
|
40.03
|
0.000
|
|
C. aurantium
|
120.66(57.58~198.70)
|
200.20(118.53~382.26)
|
2.39±0.24
|
7.72
|
0.052
|
|
A. argyi
|
31.86(0.071~4391248562)
|
238.16(16.61~1.01E+35)
|
0.60±0.06
|
27.13
|
0.000
|
|
Deltamethrin
|
0.006(0.005~0.007)
|
0.012(0.010~0.014)
|
1.75±0.16
|
3.77
|
0.290
|
As shown in Table 2, A. gramineus essential oil showed the strongest contact toxicity against S. oryzae. The oils of A. sinensis, P. cablin and C. cassia also showed strong contact toxicity, with LD50 values below 20.00 μg/adult. The oils of Mosla chinensis, Mentha canadensis, Syzygium aromaticum, Asarum heteropoides and Myristica fragrans showed moderate activity, with LD50 values below 50.00 μg/adult. In contrast, Zingiber officinale, Illicium verum, Rosmarinus officinalis, Yulania biondii, Curcuma phaeocaulis, Nardostachys jatamansi, Citrus aurantium and Artemisia argyi showed relatively weak contact toxicity. The effects of binary mixtures of A. gramineus oil with the other 25 essential oils against S. oryzae are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 Effects of binary mixtures of 26 essential oils on contact toxicity against S.oryzae.
|
Essential oil A
|
Essential oil B
|
Observed mortality/%
|
Binary mixture/%
|
Co-toxicity factor
|
Effect
|
|
Observed A
|
Observed B
|
Expected
|
Observed
|
|
A. gramineus
|
A. sinensis
|
22.00±3.74
|
6.00±2.45
|
28.00
|
32.00±6.63
|
14.29
|
additive
|
|
A. gramineus
|
P. cablin
|
22.00±3.74
|
74.00±8.12
|
96.00
|
94.00±2.45
|
-2.08
|
additive
|
|
A. gramineus
|
C. cassia
|
22.00±3.74
|
22.00±15.62
|
44.00
|
30.00±12.65
|
-31.82
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
M. chinensis
|
22.00±3.74
|
2.00±2.00
|
24.00
|
18.00±4.90
|
-25.00
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
M. canadensis
|
22.00±3.74
|
6.00±2.45
|
28.00
|
42.00±10.68
|
50.00
|
synergistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
S. aromaticum
|
22.00±3.74
|
44.00±15.68
|
66.00
|
16.00±6.78
|
-75.76
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
A. heteropoides
|
22.00±3.74
|
36.00±9.27
|
58.00
|
70.00±5.48
|
20.69
|
synergistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
M. fragrans
|
22.00±3.74
|
20.00±6.32
|
42.00
|
18.00±7.35
|
-57.14
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
N. cataria
|
22.00±3.74
|
20.00±17.61
|
42.00
|
34.00±12.49
|
-19.05
|
additive
|
|
A. gramineus
|
C. forrestii
|
22.00±3.74
|
4.00±2.45
|
26.00
|
8.00±3.74
|
-69.23
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
C. longa
|
22.00±3.74
|
28.00±9.70
|
50.00
|
12.00±3.74
|
-76.00
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
N. incisum
|
22.00±3.74
|
0.00±0.00
|
22.00
|
22.00±19.60
|
0.00
|
additive
|
|
A. gramineus
|
Z. bungeanum
|
22.00±3.74
|
62.00±10.68
|
84.00
|
26.00±5.10
|
-69.05
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
A. kravanh
|
22.00±3.74
|
6.00±4.00
|
28.00
|
2.00±2.00
|
-92.86
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
C. citratus
|
22.00±3.74
|
32.00±7.35
|
54.00
|
46.00±20.64
|
-14.81
|
additive
|
|
A. gramineus
|
A. villosum
|
22.00±3.74
|
4.00±2.45
|
26.00
|
2.00±2.00
|
-92.31
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
F. vulgare
|
22.00±3.74
|
34.00±11.66
|
56.00
|
68.00±3.74
|
21.43
|
synergistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
Z. officinale
|
22.00±3.74
|
38.00±10.68
|
60.00
|
26.00±7.48
|
-56.67
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
I. verum
|
22.00±3.74
|
34.00±9.27
|
56.00
|
8.00±8.00
|
-85.71
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
R. officinalis
|
22.00±3.74
|
24.00±8.72
|
46.00
|
74.00±12.08
|
60.87
|
synergistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
Y. biondii
|
22.00±3.74
|
58.00±13.19
|
80.00
|
82.00±9.17
|
2.50
|
additive
|
|
A. gramineus
|
C. phaeocaulis
|
22.00±3.74
|
58.00±12.41
|
80.00
|
36.00±4.00
|
-55.00
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
N. jatamansi
|
22.00±3.74
|
8.00±5.83
|
30.00
|
12.00±4.90
|
-60.00
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
C. aurantium
|
22.00±3.74
|
24.00±5.10
|
46.00
|
24.00±7.48
|
-47.83
|
antagonistic
|
|
A. gramineus
|
A. argyi
|
22.00±3.74
|
4.00±2.45
|
26.00
|
16.00±2.45
|
-38.46
|
antagonistic
|
As shown in Table 3, mixtures of A. gramineus oil with M. canadensis, A. heteropoides, F vulgare or R. officinalis showed synergistic effects, with the A. gramineus + R. officinalis mixture producing the strongest effect. Mixtures of A. gramineus oil with A. sinensis, P. cablin, N. cataria, N. incisum, C. citratus or Y. biondii showed additive effects. Mixtures with C. cassia, M. chinensis, S. aromaticum, M. fragrans, C. forrestii, C. longa, Z. bungeanum, A. kravanh, A. villosum, Z. officinale, I. verum, C. phaeocaulis, N. jatamansi, C. aurantium or A. argyi showed antagonistic effects.
The chemical compositions of A. gramineus and R. officinalis essential oils are shown in Tables 4 and 5.
Table 4 Chemical constituents of A. gramineus essential oil.
|
No.
|
Retention time/min
|
Compounds
|
Relative content/%
|
|
1
|
4.897
|
camphor
|
0.54
|
|
2
|
12.516
|
isoeugenol methyl ether
|
14.04
|
|
3
|
13.439
|
6-epishyobunone
|
0.58
|
|
4
|
14.034
|
shyobunone
|
2.08
|
|
5
|
16.559
|
patchoulane
|
0.86
|
|
6
|
17.395
|
β-asarone
|
69.94
|
|
7
|
17.732
|
asarone
|
0.74
|
|
8
|
18.707
|
aristolone
|
5.14
|
|
9
|
18.879
|
1,7-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one
|
0.78
|
|
10
|
20.308
|
(Z)-dodec-5-en-4-olide
|
0.95
|
As shown in Table 4, the main constituents of A. gramineus essential oil were β-asarone, isoeugenol methyl ether and aristolone, with relative contents of 69.94%, 14.04% and 5.14%, respectively. Together, these three constituents accounted for 89.14% of the oil.
Table 5 Chemical constituents of R. officinalis essential oil.
|
No.
|
Retention time/min
|
Compounds
|
Relative content/%
|
|
1
|
2.62
|
α-pinene
|
2.33
|
|
2
|
3.58
|
eucalyptol
|
8.63
|
|
3
|
5.39
|
(+)-2-bornanone
|
5.56
|
|
4
|
5.77
|
L(-)-borneol
|
4.49
|
|
5
|
6.23
|
α-terpineol
|
2.95
|
|
6
|
6.68
|
(-)-verbenone
|
2.79
|
|
7
|
8.66
|
tridecane
|
1.59
|
|
8
|
18.46
|
β-selinene
|
2.62
|
|
9
|
18.61
|
patchouli alcohol
|
64.33
|
|
10
|
26.99
|
hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
|
2.84
|
As shown in Table 5, the main compounds in R. officinalis oil with relative contents greater than 3% were eucalyptol, (+)-2-bornanone, L(-)-borneol and patchouli alcohol, with contents of 8.63%, 5.56%, 4.49% and 64.33%, respectively. Together, these compounds accounted for 83.01% of the oil.
The contributions of the main constituents of A. gramineus and R. officinalis oils to contact toxicity against S. oryzae are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.

Figure 1 Compound-elimination assay of A. gramineus essential oil.: As shown in Figure 1, the corrected mortality rates caused by A. gramineus essential oil, the complete mixed-constituent solution, the isoeugenol methyl ether-eliminated mixture, the β-asarone-eliminated mixture and the aristolone-eliminated mixture were 90.0%, 96.0%, 98.0%, 8.0% and 92.0%, respectively. The β-asarone-eliminated mixture produced a significantly lower corrected mortality rate than the whole oil, the complete mixture and the other two elimination treatments. These results indicate that β-asarone is the principal active constituent of A. gramineus essential oil.

Figure 2 Compound-elimination assay of R. officinalis essential oil.: As shown in Figure 2, the corrected mortality rates caused by R. officinalis essential oil, the complete mixed-constituent solution, the eucalyptol-eliminated mixture, the (+)-2-bornanone-eliminated mixture, the L(-)-borneol-eliminated mixture and the patchouli alcohol-eliminated mixture were 92.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 58.0%, respectively. The patchouli alcohol-eliminated mixture produced a significantly lower corrected mortality rate than the whole oil, the complete mixture and the other elimination treatments. These results indicate that patchouli alcohol is an important active constituent of R. officinalis essential oil.
The contact toxicities of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol against S. oryzae are shown in Table 6.
Table 6 Contact toxicity of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol against S. oryzae.
|
No
|
Treatment
|
LD50/μg·adult-1
|
95% CI
|
Slope ± SE
|
χ2
|
P-value
|
|
1
|
A. gramineus essential oil
|
4.01
|
2.21~5.76
|
2.14±0.20
|
6.98
|
0.073
|
|
2
|
R. officinalis essential oil
|
163.20
|
52.38~657.10
|
2.88±0.27
|
21.89
|
0.000
|
|
3
|
β-asarone
|
3.82
|
2.74~5.28
|
4.11±0.30
|
11.51
|
0.009
|
|
4
|
patchouli alcohol
|
39.93
|
24.96~59.19
|
3.18±0.26
|
12.81
|
0.005
|
As shown in Table 6, β-asarone and patchouli alcohol, which were identified by the compound-elimination assay as active constituents, showed stronger contact toxicity against S. oryzae than their corresponding whole essential oils.
The contact toxicity of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol mixtures against S. oryzae is shown in Table 7.
Table 7 Effects of binary mixtures of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol against S. oryzae.
|
β-asarone: patchouli alcohol (V/V)
|
Expected mortality rate/%
|
Observed corrected mortality rate/%
|
Co-toxicity factor
|
Effect
|
|
0:10
|
62
|
62
|
0
|
additive
|
|
1:9
|
32
|
40
|
25
|
synergistic
|
|
2:8
|
30
|
20
|
-33
|
antagonistic
|
|
3:7
|
25
|
20
|
-20
|
antagonistic
|
|
4:6
|
16
|
14
|
-13
|
additive
|
|
5:5
|
24
|
10
|
-58
|
antagonistic
|
|
6:4
|
22
|
4
|
-82
|
antagonistic
|
|
7:3
|
48
|
20
|
-58
|
antagonistic
|
|
8:2
|
52
|
22
|
-58
|
antagonistic
|
|
9:1
|
58
|
46
|
-21
|
antagonistic
|
|
10:0
|
68
|
68
|
0
|
additive
|
As shown in Table 7, the 1:9 mixture of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol showed a synergistic effect against S. oryzae based on the co-toxicity factor. Mixtures at ratios of 4:6, 0:10 and 10:0 showed additive effects, whereas the other ratios showed antagonistic effects.
The contact toxicity of the 1:9 β-asarone + patchouli alcohol mixture is shown in Table 8.
Table 8 Contact toxicity of the 1:9 β-asarone + patchouli alcohol mixture against S. oryzae.
|
β-asarone:patchouli alcohol (V/V)
|
Expected LD50/μg·adult-1
|
Observed LD50/μg·adult-1
|
Synergistic ratio
|
Effect
|
|
1:9
|
20.41
|
35.42
|
0.58
|
additive
|
As shown in Table 8, the 1:9 mixture of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol was less toxic than β-asarone alone but more toxic than patchouli alcohol alone or R. officinalis essential oil.
DISCUSSION
Food security is closely linked to economic development and social stability, and stored-grain pests cause substantial losses during storage. In this study, we screened 26 plant essential oils against S. oryzae and found that A. gramineus oil had the strongest contact toxicity, with an LD50 value of 4.01 μg/adult. β-asarone, the principal active constituent of A. gramineus oil, had an LD50 value of 3.82 μg/adult. Reported LD50 values for essential oils from Elsholtzia kachinensis (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Prain, 1904), Melaleuca bracteata (Myrtales: Myrtaceae; F.Muell., 1858), Rhododendron heliolepis (Ericales: Ericaceae; Franch., 1887), Rhododendron davidsonianum (Ericales: Ericaceae; Rehd. et Wils., 1913), Artemisia judaica (Asterales: Asteraceae; Linnaeus, 1753), Rhododendron strigillosum (Ericales: Ericaceae; Franch., 1886) and Lobularia maritima (Brassicales: Brassicaceae; Desv., 1814) against S. oryzae are 29.62, 20.40, 15.02, 10.20, 9.62, 9.18 and 6.23 μg/adult, respectively (Zhang et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2021; Sang et al., 2022; Abdelgaleil et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2020). Reported LD50 values for methyl eugenol, dehydrothymoquinone, carvone, methyl cinnamate, myristic acid and 3-pentenone against S. oryzae are 30.70, 28.82, 22.35, 10.70, 6.13 and 5.47 μg/adult, respectively (Zhang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022; Sang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2020). Compared with these reported values, A. gramineus oil and β-asarone showed strong contact toxicity against S. oryzae under similar bioassay conditions.
Insecticidal activity and possible mechanisms of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol: The compound-elimination assay was used to evaluate the contribution of three major constituents of A. gramineus oil (isoeugenol methyl ether, β-asarone and aristolone) and four major constituents of R. officinalis oil (eucalyptol, (+)-2-bornanone, L(-)-borneol and patchouli alcohol) to contact toxicity against S. oryzae. The results identified β-asarone and patchouli alcohol as the key constituents responsible for the contact toxicity of A. gramineus and R. officinalis oils, respectively.
Previous studies reported that the 48-h fumigant LC50 of β-asarone against Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae; Fabricius, 1792) was 4.62 μL/L, with a contact LD50 of 42.56 μg/adult (Song, 2007). At 120 h, the fumigant LC50 values of β-asarone against Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae; Motschulsky, 1855), Rhyzopertha dominica, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae; Herbst, 1797) and C. maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae; Fabricius, 1775) were 17.82, 4.42, 116.48 and 0.73 μL/L, respectively (Yao et al., 2009). Against second-instar larvae of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae; Fabricius, 1775) and Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae; Walker, 1865), the 24-h contact LD50 values were 6.24 and 1.22 μg/adult, respectively (Yooboon et al., 2023).
For patchouli alcohol, the 24-h fumigant LD50 against Coptotermes formosanus (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae; Shiraki, 1909) was 5.33 μg/adult (Zhu et al., 2003). The 24-h contact LD50 values against T. castaneum and Lasioderma serricorne were 96.60 and 13.08 μg/adult, respectively (Feng et al., 2019).
Previous work showed that S. oryzae exposed to β-asarone in contact and fumigation assays passed through four behavioural stages: excitation, convulsion, paralysis and either death or recovery (Qiu et al., 2014). Treatment with β-asarone inhibited acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase activities and induced carboxylesterase activity, suggesting that β-asarone may act as a neurotoxic compound. In Sf9 insect cells, β-asarone induced apoptosis, as indicated by cell shrinkage, rounding, membrane blebbing, chromatin condensation, apoptotic-body formation and nuclear DNA fragmentation (Yooboon et al., 2019). Annexin V staining further confirmed β-asarone-induced apoptosis. Thus, β-asarone may exert insecticidal effects by disrupting neural function and inducing apoptosis. Patchouli alcohol also appears to have neurotoxic effects. In termites, patchouli alcohol caused convulsions and tremors within minutes, followed by paralysis, rigidity and death within 1 h (Zhu et al., 2003). After 24 h, the termite exoskeleton remained intact, but internal tissues were dissolved, the body became semi-transparent and severe damage occurred at the application site. These observations suggest that patchouli alcohol may act through both neurotoxicity and disruption of the cuticular wax layer, thereby increasing body-wall permeability and causing internal tissue damage. In S. oryzae, β-asarone may therefore disrupt neural function and induce apoptosis, whereas patchouli alcohol may disrupt neural function and damage the cuticular barrier.
Mixtures of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol and their insecticidal implications: To evaluate the interaction between β-asarone and patchouli alcohol, the two compounds were mixed at a volume ratio of 1:9 and tested against S. oryzae. The mixture showed stronger contact toxicity than R. officinalis oil and patchouli alcohol alone, but weaker toxicity than A. gramineus oil and β-asarone alone. Previous work reported that capsaicin mixed with β-asarone at 3.00, 6.00, 12.00 and 18.00 μg/adult increased toxicity against second-instar larvae of S. litura, with enhancement factors of 1.87, 3.08, 8.47 and 11.08, respectively. Similar mixtures against M. separata larvae produced enhancement factors of 3.29, 8.45, 7.23 and 44.23, respectively (Yooboon et al., 2023). In the present study, A. gramineus oil combined with R. officinalis oil showed synergism, whereas β-asarone combined with patchouli alcohol showed an additive effect. This difference indicates that the activity of plant essential oils may depend on interactions among multiple constituents, including minor or weakly active compounds, rather than only on the dominant active constituents. For example, thymol was identified as the active constituent of Thymus mongolicus (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Ronniger, 1934) oil against Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae; Boisduval, 1867). The LC50 values of T. mongolicus oil and thymol against T. cinnabarinus were 762.1 and 1183.9 mg/L, respectively, indicating that the whole oil was more active than thymol alone. When thymol was mixed with less active compounds such as linalool, terpinene, umbelliferone and parthenolide, or with inactive compounds such as α-pinene, benzoic acid and gallic acid ethyl ester, corrected mortality increased significantly compared with thymol alone (Wu et al., 2017).
Similarly, the active constituent of Salvia hispanica (Lamiales: Lamiaceae; Linnaeus, 1753) oil against Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae; Hübner, 1808) was α-olivetone. When α-olivetone was mixed with less active compounds, including eucalyptol, camphene, α-caryophyllene, limonene, umbelliferone, citronellol and linalool, or with inactive compounds, including camphene, menthol, eucalyptol, β-pinene, 3-carene and β-caryophyllene, corrected mortality increased significantly relative to α-olivetone alone (Chen et al., 2021). Miresmailli et al. (2006) also found that eliminating minor constituents such as umbelliferone (0.9%), α-terpineol (1.1%) and citronellol (2.2%) from R. officinalis oil affected mortality in Tetranychus urticae (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae; Koch, 1836) on Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabales: Fabaceae; Linnaeus, 1753), although eliminating the two most abundant constituents, eucalyptol (31.5%) and α-pinene (17.5%), had a stronger effect. These findings indicate that low-abundance constituents can still contribute to the overall insecticidal activity of essential oils. Therefore, the biological activity of plant essential oils is not always determined by a single active compound; it may instead arise from interactions among multiple constituents that jointly affect insect physiology and behaviour. Because essential oils are chemically complex, studying interactions among their constituents is important for developing combined botanical insecticides and for improving biological control strategies. Such interactions may also explain why essential oils differ from synthetic pesticides in their dose-response patterns. Synthetic pesticides often act on specific targets and produce relatively linear dose-mortality relationships. In contrast, essential oils contain complex mixtures of terpenoids and phenols. At concentrations below a critical threshold, individual constituents may not penetrate the insect cuticle or disrupt physiological processes sufficiently. Under such conditions, essential oils exert mainly sublethal effects: insect survival is maintained, yet key metabolic‑enzyme activities (e.g.,AChE, LOP) are significantly altered. Once this threshold is exceeded, multiple active compounds may act together and cause rapid mortality, producing a threshold‑type response. In addition, variation in cuticle thickness and detoxification‑enzyme activity among S. oryzae individuals may further shape the response curve. Thus, the observed dose‑response pattern likely reflects both the chemical complexity of essential oils and the physiological heterogeneity of the test insects.(Zimmermann et al., 2025; Albogami et al., 2025; Yoon and Tak, 2025; Al-Harbi et al., 2021).
Conclusions: This study screened 26 plant essential oils and found that A. gramineus oil had the strongest contact toxicity against S. oryzae. Among binary oil mixtures, A. gramineus oil combined with R. officinalis oil produced the strongest synergistic effect. GC-MS analysis showed that the main constituents of A. gramineus oil were isoeugenol methyl ether (14.04%), β-asarone (69.94%) and aristolone (5.14%), whereas the main constituents of R. officinalis oil were eucalyptol (8.63%), (+)-2-bornanone (5.56%), L(-)-borneol (4.49%) and patchouli alcohol (64.33%). The compound-elimination assay identified β-asarone and patchouli alcohol as the main active constituents of A. gramineus and R. officinalis oils, respectively. Both compounds showed stronger contact toxicity against S. oryzae than their corresponding whole oils. The 1:9 mixture of β-asarone and patchouli alcohol showed an additive effect. These findings suggest that β-asarone is a promising active compound for the botanical control of S. oryzae.
Acknowledgements: We thank the reviewers for their constructive comments.
REFERENCES
Abbassy, M.A., S.A.M. Abdelgaleil and R.Y.A. Rabie (2009). Insecticidal and synergistic effects of Majorana hortensis essential oil and some of its major constituents. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 131(3): 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00854.x
Abdelgaleil, S.A.M., M.I.E. Mohamed, M.S. Shawir and H.K. Abou-Taleb (2016). Chemical composition, insecticidal and biochemical effects of essential oils of different plant species from Northern Egypt on the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. J. Pest Sci. 89(1): 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0665-z
Al-Harbi, N.A., N.M.Al-Attar, D.M.Hikal, S.E. Mohamed, A.A.H.A. Latef, A.A. Ibrahim and M.A, Abdein (2021). Evaluation of insecticidal effects of plants essential oils extracted from basil, black seeds and lavender against Sitophilus oryzae. Plants. 10(5): 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050829
Albogami, B.Z., S.M. Alasmari, G.E. Nenaah and S.G. Nenaah (2025). Nanoemulsification of sage essential oil and camphor, a principal monoterpene enhanced insecticidal bioactivity against the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae: a sustainable green approach for pest control. J. Pest Sci. 99(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-025-01982-3
Blenau, W., E. Rademacher and A. Baumann (2012). Plant essential oils and formamidines as insecticides/acaricides: what are the molecular targets? Apidologie 43(3): 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0108-7
Ahmad, A., Q. M. Ali, P. A. Baloch, R. Uddin and S. Qadri (2017). Effect of Preliminary Infestation of Three Stored Grain Insect Pests Tribolium castaneum, (H) Sitophils oryzae (L.) and Trogoderma granarium (E), their Population Buildup, Loss of Germination and Consequently Wheat Loss during Storage. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 13:79-84. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2017.13.14
Chen, Y., J. Luo, N. Zhang, W. Yu, J. Jiang and G. Dai (2021). Insecticidal activities of Salvia hispanica L. essential oil and combinations of their main compounds against the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua. Ind. Crops Prod. 162: 113271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113271
Dhinakaran, S.R., N. Mathew and S. Munusamy (2019). Synergistic terpene combinations as larvicides against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti Linn. Drug Dev. Res. 80(6): 791-799. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21560
Digilio, M.C., E. Mancini, E. Voto and V. De Feo (2008). Insecticide activity of Mediterranean essential oils. J. Plant Interact. 3(1): 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429140701843741
Fang, R., C.H. Jiang, X.Y. Wang, H.M. Zhang, Z.L. Liu, L. Zhou, S.S. Du, and Z.W. Deng (2010). Insecticidal activity of essential oil of Carum carvi fruits from China and its main components against two grain storage insects. Molecules. 15(12): 9391-9402. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15129391
Feng, Y.X., Y. Wang, C.X. You, S.S. Guo, Y.S. Du and S.-S. Du (2019). Bioactivities of patchoulol and phloroacetophenone from Pogostemon cablin essential oil against three insects. Int. J. Food Prop. 22(1): 1365-1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2019.1648508
Gaire, S., M.E. Scharf and A.D. Gondhalekar (2019). Toxicity and neurophysiological impacts of plant essential oil components on bed bugs (Cimicidae: Hemiptera). Sci. Rep. 9(1): 3961. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40275-5
Gyawali, A., A. Neupane, A. Gaire and K. Kafle (2026). Host preference dynamics of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.) in stored cereals. Arch. Agric. Environ. Sci 11(1): 14-21. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2026.110103
Isman, M.B (2000). Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Prot. 19(8-10): 603-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-2194(00)00079-x
Jiang, Y.-L., Q.-L. Liang, L.-X. Wei, X.-P. Meng, K. Lin and Y. Yue (2021). Prevention and control effects of several biopesticides and their mixtures on bulb rot disease of Lanzhou lilies during storage. Chin. J. Biol. Control 37(5): 1041-1049. https://doi.org/10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.06.002
Kim, S., J. Yoon and J.-H. Tak (2021). Synergistic mechanism of insecticidal activity in basil and mandarin essential oils against the tobacco cutworm. J. Pest Sci. 94(4): 1119-1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-021-01345-8
Kim, S.-I., J.-Y. Roh, D.-H. Kim, H.-S. Lee and Y.-J. Ahn (2003). Insecticidal activities of aromatic plant extracts and essential oils against Sitophilus oryzae and Callosobruchus chinensis. J. Stored Prod. Res. 39(3): 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-474x(02)00017-6
Koorki, Z., S. Shahidi-Noghabi, K. Mahdian and M. Pirmaoradi (2018). Chemical Composition and Insecticidal Properties of Several Plant Essential Oils on the Melon Aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 21(2): 420-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060x.2018.1435308
Lougraimzi, H., S. El Iraqui, A. Bouaichi, S. Gouit, E.H. Achbani and M. Fadli (2018). Insecticidal effect of essential oil and powder of Mentha pulegium L. leaves against Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus, 1763) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst, 1797) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Tenebrionidae), the main pests of stored wheat in Morocco. Pol. J. Entomol. 87(3): 263-278. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjen-2018-0018
Miresmailli, S., R. Bradbury and M.B. Isman (2006). Comparative toxicity of Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil and blends of its major constituents against Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) on two different host plants. Pest Manage. Sci. 62(4): 366-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1157
Nguyen, T.T., P.J. Collins and P.R. Ebert (2015). Inheritance and characterization of strong resistance to phosphine in Sitophilus oryzae (L.). PloS ONE. 10(4),e0124335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124335
Omar, A.F., F.M.A. Khalil, M.M. Alomran, T. Ismail, A.I. EL Tokhy, K. Abdelaal, F.N. Gharsan, R.N. Almozini and A.M. Abouelatta (2024). Toxicity and enzymatic activity changes in rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) induced by basil (Ocimum basilicum) and cumin (Cuminum cyminum) essential oils. Sci.Rep. 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80329-x
Park, C., S.I. Kim and Y.J. Ahn (2003). Insecticidal activity of asarones identified in Acorus gramineus rhizome against three coleopteran stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 39(3): 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-474x(02)00027-9
Pavela, R. (2007). Possibilities of botanical insecticide exploitation in plant protection. Pest Technol. 1(1): 47-52
Perrett, S. and P.J. Whitfield (1995). Anthelmintic and pesticidal activity of Acorus gramineus (Araceae) is associated with phenylpropanoid asarones. Phytother. Res. 9(6): 405-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2650090604
Peng, Y.Y., J.J Yuan, F.H. Liu and J. N. Ye (2005) Determination of active components in rosemary by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 39(3-4): 431-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2005.03.033
Qiu, Y., X.H. Song and Y.Z. Huang (2014). Behavior response and insecticidal mechanism of β-asarone against Sitophilus zeamais adult. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 29(7): 80-85. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0174.2014.07.016
Ramzi, A., A. El Ouali Lalami, Y. Ez zoubi, A. Assouguem, R. Almeer, A. Najda, R. Ullah, S. Ercisli and A. Farah (2022). Insecticidal Effect of Wild-Grown Mentha pulegium and Rosmarinus officinalis Essential Oils and Their Main Monoterpenes against Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Plants 11(9): 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091193
Ryuk, J. A., Y. S. Kim, H. W. Lee and B.S. Ko (2014). Identification of Acorus gramineus, A. calamus, and A. tatarinowii using sequence characterized amplified regions (SCAR) primers for monitoring of Acori graminei rhizoma in Korean markets. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 7(9): 2488-2496
Sang, Y., P. Wang, J. Liu, Y. Hao and X. Wang (2022). Chemical composition of essential oils from three Rhododendron species and their repellent, insecticidal and fumigant activities. Chem. Biodivers. 19(12): e202200740. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202200740
Sang, Y.L., L. Dai, P. Wang, L.J. Chen, M.L. Jiao, J.Y. Liu, N.Z. Zhang, G.W. Fan, Y.J. Hao and X.L. Wang (2023). Investigation of insecticidal activity of two Rhododendron species on stored-product insects. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 130(2): 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-022-00654-z
Sharaby, A. and M. El-Dosary (2016). Toxic and biochemical effects of Juniperus communis essential oil on the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 26(2): 339-344.
Song, X.H (2007). Studies on bioactivity and mechanism of β-asarone derived from Acorus gramineus Soland rhizome against Rhyzopertha dominica (Fab.). M.Sc. thesis (unpublished). Huazhong Agricultural University; Wuhan (China). https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y1198393
Sheikh, M.A., M. Yaqoob, F.J. Wani, T.A Bhat, M. Gani and M.A. Bhat (2024), Insecticidal activity of different doses of Acorus calamus essential oil against Sitophilus oryzae. J Sci Res Rep. 30(6): 666-670. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i62084
Vendan, S.E., S. Manivannan, A.M. Sunny and R. Murugesan (2017). Phytochemical residue profiles in rice grains fumigated with essential oils for the control of rice weevil. PLos ONE. 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186020
Wang, H.Y., M.Z. Zhang, X. Han, J. Cong, S.Q. Wang, S.L. He, D.S. Wei, Y.B. Zhang, J. Qin and D.A. Sampietro (2020). Insecticidal and repellent efficacy of the essential oil from Lobularia maritima and trans-3-pentenenitrile against insect pests of stored grains. Int. J. Food Prop. 23(1): 1125-1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1778723
Wu, L., X. Huo, X. Zhou, D. Zhao, W. He, S. Liu, H. Liu, T. Feng and C. Wang (2017). Acaricidal activity and synergistic effect of Thyme oil constituents against Carmine spider mite (Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval)). Molecules 22(11): 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111873
Yao, Y.J., W.L. Cai, C.J. Yang, H.Y. Zhang and H.X. Hua (2009). Fumigant toxicity of β-asarone extracted from Acorus calamus against four stored grain beetles. Acta Entomol. Sin. 52(4): 453-460. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2009.04.014
Yeom, H.J., J.S. Kang, G.H. Kim and I.K. Park (2012). Insecticidal and acetylcholine esterase inhibition activity of Apiaceae plant essential oils and their constituents against adults of German cockroach (Blattella germanica). J. Agric. Food Chem. 60(29): 7194-7203. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf302009w
Yooboon, T., K. Kuramitsu, V. Bullangpoti, Y. Kainoh and S. Furukawa (2019). Cytotoxic effects of β-asarone on Sf9 insect cells. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 102(1): e21596. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21596
Yooboon, T., V. Bullangpoti and Y. Kainoh (2023). Contact toxicity and antifeedant activity of binary mixtures of piperine and β-asarone against the crop pests, Spodoptera litura and Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Pest Manage. 69(1): 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2020.1853275
Yoon, J. and J.H. Tak (2025). Prediction of mixture toxicity of essential oil constituents using nonparametric and parametric models against Musca domestica L. Pest Manag. Sci. 81(12): 8595-8606. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70164
Yallappa, R., K.H Eraiah and C.S.V. Babu (2025). Chemical and biological investigation of Plectranthus amboinicus essential oil in the control of Sitophilus oryzae L. Sci Rep. 15(1) https://doi.org/15(1).10.1038/s41598-025-05689-4
Zhang, J., Y. Wang, Y. Feng, S. Du and L. Jia (2021). Contact toxicity and repellent efficacy of essential oil from aerial parts of Melaleuca bracteata and its major compositions against three kinds of insects. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 24(2): 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060x.2021.1886995
Zhang, J.-W., Y.-X. Feng, Y.-S. Du, X.-X. Lu, Y. Zheng, W. Dan and S.-S. Du (2022). Composition and Insecticidal Activity of Elsholtzia kachinensis Prain, a Traditional Vegetable and Herbal Medicine. J. Oleo Sci. 71(7): 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess21245
Zhu, B.C.R., G. Henderson, Y. Yu and R.A. Laine (2003). Toxicity and repellency of Patchouli oil and Patchouli alcohol against Formosan subterranean termites Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 51(16): 4585-4588. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0301495
Zakaria, N.N.M and W.F. Zuharah (2025). Bioefficacy of botanical essential oil extracts on Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Insert. 30(3): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17576/serangga-2025-3003-01
Zimmermann, R.C., A.M. Schafaschek, A.M. Bischoff, M. Beger, J. Santana, S.B. Demacedo, M. Lelen, C.E.N. Martins, S.D. Amaral, R.A. Defreitas, A. Benatto, C.G. Poitevin, H.D.S. Duarte and J.M. DA Rosa (2025). Toxicity of Melaleuca rhaphiophylla essential oils against Sitophilus zeamais and Sitophilus oryzae. J. Pest Sci. 98(3): 1277-1292. https://doi.org/1292.10.1007/s10340-025-01885-3