COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SOME NEONICOTINOIDS AND TRADITIONAL INSECTICIDES ON SUCKING INSECT PESTS AND THEIR NATURAL ENEMIES ON BT-121 COTTON CROP

S. Ahmed, 1M. S. Nisar, M. M. Shakir, M. Imran, K. Iqbal

S. Ahmed, 1M. S. Nisar, M. M. Shakir, M. Imran and K. Iqbal

Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Pakistan
1University College of Agriculture, Dera Ghazi Khan, Sub-campus University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Pakistan

Corresponding Author: saha786_pk@yahoo.com
Page Number(s): 660-663
Published Online First: April 01, 2014
Publication Date: April 01, 2014

ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted to determine efficacy of four neonicotinoids viz; nitenpyram 10SL, thiacloprid 480SC, imidacloprid 200SL, acetamaprid 20SL and four traditional insecticides such as profenofos 50EC, methidathion 40EC, bifenthrin 10EC, λ-cyhalothrin  2.5EC at their recommended field doses against sucking insect pests of cotton and their natural enemies on cotton variety Bt-121 at a farmers’ field in Multan. The data on post spray number of insect per leaf was taken to find difference among treatments. The results showed that nitenpyram, thiacloprid and imidacloprid were safer to natural enemies and toxic for the sucking pests as compared to conventional insecticides. The range of percent survival of the green lacewings (42.5-87.5 and 37.5-57.5), lady bird beetle (50.0-60.0 and 26.6-46.6) and pirate bug (28.0-60.0 and 24.0-57.0) was in neonicotinoids and conventional insecticide treated plots, respectively. The use of neonicotinoids for compatibility into integrated pest management is discussed.

Keywords: predators, OPs, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, sucking insects, Bt cotton, field
Open Access: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).


Download Statistics
This Manuscript
Full Text
25
downloads
Indicators
Metrics

Cite Score: 1.3

JCR Year: 2025

Indexing
Status

Web of Science (SCIE)

SCOPUS (Q3)

Journal Metrics
Current

Journal Impact Factor: 0.5

HEC Category: W

ISSN Details
Verified

Print ISSN: 1018-7081

Electronic ISSN: 2309-8694

Search the Journal

Use the fields below to search for articles by Title, Author, or Keywords.

All Downloads
Full Text
85,432
downloads
Supplementary
264
downloads