
POSTHARVEST PHYSIOLOGY OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY: A REVIEW
J. Ferdousi1, M. I. Hossain*2, S. R. Saha3, M. Rob1, T. Afroz4. S. Pramanik5, M. R. Islam6 and D. D. Nath1
1Department of Horticulture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
2Deputy Director, SAURES, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
3Department of Agroforestry and Environment, BSMRAU, Gazipur, Bangladesh
4Department of Agroforestry and Environment, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh
5SSO, BRRI, Gazipur, Bangladesh, 6SSO, BARI, Gazipur, Bangladesh
*Corresponding Author’s Email: iqbal.hossain@sau.ac.bd
ABSTRACT
This review basically provides knowledge regarding postharvest physiology, allied factors and management of harvested horticultural produce. Commodities with higher respiration and ethylene production tend to have shorter shelf life with low quality than those with lower respiration and ethylene production. Transpiration and respiration processes of harvested fruits and vegetables result in weight loss, softening and shriveling, loss of peel glossiness etc. Fruit and vegetable storage life is negatively impacted by ethylene production. Fungi and bacteria are the biggest offenders among almost all postharvest disorders of fruits and vegetables. One of the largest significant factors impacting the postharvest life of fruits and vegetables is temperature because it has an intense influence on the rate of physiological responses such as respiration, transpiration, ethylene production and disease development. The rate of respiration and the generation of ethylene are both regulated by high temperatures. On the other hand, high temperature with high relative humidity favors the disease's development but low temperature (5oC) and high relative humidity (RH 96%) result in low transpiration. Control or modified atmosphere storage (O2 below 5%, CO2 above 3%), vacuum pack, chemical treatments and edible coating are the effective ways for controlling respiration, ethylene production, transpiration and disease development but it is mainly dependent on types of fruits and vegetables.
Keywords: Postharvest Physiology, Storage life, Transpiration, Respiration, Ethylene, Temperature, Controlled Atmosphere, Modified Atmosphere, Coating.
INTRODUCTION
The horticultural crops like fruits and vegetables are thought to be both commercially and nutritionally important food items. Because, these foods provide a major source of vitamins, minerals, fiber, sugars, antioxidants, organic acids as well as nutrients (Wu, 2010). There is strong evidence that consumption of fruits and vegetables helps prevent a number of chronic Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, obesity, cancer and respiratory disorders, typically because they contain key phytochemicals (Elhadi, 2019). World Health Organization (WHO) advises eating more than 400 g of fruits and vegetables daily to improve overall health and decrease the risk of certain NCDs, as it’s a part of a healthy diet with low fat, sugar and sodium. Fruits and vegetables lose 10-15% of their weight after harvest, compared to 20-40% in undeveloped countries (Hossain et al., 2020). This suggests that roughly one-fourth of the output is never consumed (Kahramanoğlu, 2017). Improper post - harvest handling results in the loss of 30 to 60% of the world's total yield of fruits and vegetables (Elhadi, 2019; Choudhury et al., 2019). Postharvest losses of horticultural crops can be defined as losses of harvested crops in quality and quantity until consumption (Wendimagegn, 2020). Horticulturalcrops are very perishable in nature, many physiological, biochemical and microbial deterioration happened to occur resulting huge economic losses (Choudhury et al., 2019).
There are a number of physiological processes, including respiration, transpiration, and ethylene production, that play a significant role in the degeneration of horticultural crops. (Yahia, 2019). Continuous metabolic processes, water loss, physiological disorders, mechanical damage and pathological collapse are the main causes of deterioration of fresh fruits and vegetables (Wills et al., 2007). The quality of fruit cannot be improved after harvest as all the parameters relating to quality are developed while the fruit is attached to plants. Harvested crops are incapable of synthesizing carbohydrates due to leaf loss since they have no longer entree to water and nutrients formerly provided by the root system. As the detached plant parts are living, a substrate is essential for metabolism, which is drawn from tissue-stored carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins (DeLong and Prange, 2003). Postharvest diseases play a vital role in postharvest loss due to the lack of sophisticated postharvest storage facilities especially in developing countries (Singh et al., 2017). The microbial decay is mainly caused by fungi, yeast, molds and bacteria, (Yahaya and Mardiyya, 2019). Postharvest physiology and technology have been the key factors for sustaining and extending the storage life of perishables commodities (Pedreschi, 2017). Postharvest physiology is the study on the physiological processes of living plant organs after harvesting. Specifically, its emphases on understanding and controlling respiratory process, dehydration, ethylene production and microbial infection (Wikipedia, 2020).
Some technologies, such as cooling and preservation, may extend the storage life of fruits and vegetables after harvest by controlling these physiological processes (Saltveit, 2019). To keep the high standard for a longer duration, slowing the respiration rate (Tano et al., 2005). Proper postharvest management techniques can reduce water loss, delay respiration rate and ethylene production, and inhibit the development of decay causing pathogens e.g fungi, bacteria, yeast and moulds (Irtwange, 2006). Food safeties are the main concern to applying postharvest management technologies of horticultural crops by reduction in losses and maintaining the quality of the produce (Wu, 2010). The fact that newly harvested fruits and vegetables are still alive, respiring organisms that go through a number of physiological changes after harvesting, contributes to the high rate at which they are lost during postharvest handling (Kahramanoğlu, 2017). Scientific study of postharvest biology and technology is very important for the regulation of these physiological events critical for extending the shelf life together with maintenance of quality. Therefore, this review is designed to evaluate the physiological reasons involved in the deterioration of harvested fruits and vegetables; and to describe the management techniques of reducing the postharvest losses.
Physiological Status of fruits and vegetables: Postharvest physiology has direct role to postharvest management of fresh products by using proper storage and transport conditions (Wikipedia, 2020). There are many physiological processes (respiration, transpiration, ethylene, postharvest diseases) and external conditions (heat, humidity levels, air constitution, light) which causes deterioration of harvested goods (Kahramanoğlu, 2017). Respiration rate, ethylene production, and weight loss associated with transpiration are the major factors known to regulate the postharvest physiology of fruits and vegetables (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of factors affecting postharvest quality of fruits and vegetables
(Source: Mishra and Gamage, 2007)
Respiration: Though fruits and vegetables have been separated from the plant, they persist living after harvest (Silva, 2008). Respiration is a primary step by which all living things convert deposited into energy. It consists of the catalytic hydrolysis of substances like carbs, proteins, fatty acids, organic acids, etc. in the ambient atmosphere O2 to CO2 and H2O, and is followed by an energy release (Mishra and Gamage, 2007). During respiration, one mole glucose (180 g) produced 686 kcal. Respiration is combinedly completed by three metabolic pathways such as, glycolysis (anaerobic), the citric acid cycle (aerobic) and the electron transport chain (aerobic).
Respiratory pattern of harvested Fruits: Based on the pattern of respiration fruits are mainly classified into climacteric (e.g. Banana, apple, guava, papaya etc.) or non-climacteric (e.g. Orange, grape, olive, pineapple etc.) group (Elhadi, 2019). The respiration rate slows down in non-climacteric fruits and storage organs after harvest, in contrast rapidly increases in climacteric fruits (Kays and Paull, 2004); and this increase consist of four distinct phases (Figure 2; Saltveit, 2016).

Figure 2. The climacteric and non-climacteric pattern/phases of respiration in ripening fruit.
Janave (2007) observed continuous weight loss in mango from picking day to full maturity (Figure 3A). In non-spongy fruits, the initial respiration rate decreased up to three days of storage. As the fruits started ripening, an abrupt rise in the respiratory burst was observed reaching a peak by day nine and declined further up to 13 days of storage (Figure 3B).

|

|
 Figure 3. Fruit weight loss and respiration rate of Alphonso mango fruits: A. Fruit weight loss and B. the respiratory pattern of ripen non-spongy - and ripe spongy - fruits during postharvest ripening.
|
Respiration rate and storability: The storability of fruits and vegetables largely depends on the stage of maturity, their structure, respiration rate at harvest and the next physiological process (Brummell and Toivonen, 2018). Generally, the longevity of a crop is reduced if its respiratory rate is high relative to that of a crop with a relatively low respiration rate (Saltveit, 2019). Mushroom, broccoli, bean, cauliflower, berry etc. have high respiration rates compared to apples, citrus, onions, and potatoes which have limited rate of respiration (Table 1).
Bodbodak and Moshfeghifar (2016) concluded that respiration rate has a reverse relationship with storability. They reported that storage life of pear and asparagus are very shorter than avocado, turnip and apple due to their respiratory pattern (Figure 4; Patterson, 2010).
Effect of temperature on respiration: Temperature is one of the major factors affecting shelf life of horticultural crops, as it has a reflective effect on the rates of biological reactions, e.g., respiration and metabolism (Saltveit, 2019). According to the Van't Hoff rule, the velocity of a biological reaction accelerates 2 to 3-fold for every 10°C rise in temperature. A product with an average life span of 13 days at 20°C can be stored for up to 100 days at 0°C, but only for 4 days at 40°C (Table 2).
Table 1. Classification of fruits and vegetables on the basis of respiration rate.
Class
|
Range at 5oC
(mg CO2 kg-1h-1)
|
Commodities
|
Very Low
|
<5
|
Nuts, dates
|
Low
|
5 to 10
|
Apple, citrus, grape, onion, potato
|
Moderate
|
10 to 20
|
Apricot, banana, cherry, pear, fig, cabbage, carrot, lettuce, pepper, tomato
|
High
|
20 to 40
|
Strawberry, blackberry, raspberry, cauliflower, lima bean, avocado
|
Very High
|
40 to 60
|
Snap bean, Brussels sprouts
|
Extremely High
|
>60
|
Broccoli, mushroom, pea, spinach
|
(Source: Saltveit, 2019, Gross et al., 2016.)

Figure 4. Relationship between respiration rate and storage life of certain fruits and vegetables at 5˚C.
Table 2. Effect of temperature on rate of deterioration and relative shelf life.
Temperature (0C)
|
Relative velocity of deterioration (rate)
|
Relative shelf life
(days)
|
0
|
1.0
|
100
|
10
|
3.0
|
33
|
20
|
7.5
|
13
|
30
|
15.0
|
7
|
40
|
22.5
|
4
|
(Source: Saltveit, 2016)
Transpiration: Transpiration or water loss is also a major cause of harvested fruits and vegetables shrinkage and softening, lowering food value and nutrient content (Kader, 1992). The stomata, cuticle, epidermal cells, trichrome are responsible for regulating the transpiration rate of fruits and vegetables (Valenzuela et al., 2017). The water content of dried seeds to fresh fruits and vegetable ranges from 10-95% (Diaz-Perez, 2019). Enhanced respiration, loss of water through transpiration, and metabolic activity all contributed to a dramatic increase in the physiological weight loss that occurs during storage. After 4 days of harvesting, physiological weight loss ranged from 0.00 to 12.22%, while after 8 days it ranged from 0.56 to 23.61% (Table 3) in mango. At 12 days, highest weight loss was observed in case of control fruits (26.41%), whereas it was found lowest at wax coated fruits (1.18%) (Mandal et al., 2018).
Transpiration as a Function of Temperature and Relative Humidity:Transpiration rates are higher in warmer environments and lower when the relative humidity is higher. Pomegranate arils and aril-sacs showed highly variable transpiration rates across storage conditions (Figure 8). The lowest transpiration rate was found at of 5°C with 96% relative humidity, whereas the highest transpiration rate was found at 22°C with 76% relative humidity for both fruit fractions (Figure 5) (Aindongo et al., 2014).
Table 3. Effect of edible coatings on percentage of weight loss, decay and shelf life of mango fruits due to transpiration.
|
|
Fruit decay (%)
|
Shelf life (Days)
|
4 Days
|
8 Days
|
12 Days
|
12 Days
|
Olive oil coated
|
9.38
|
14.67
|
17.95
|
22.73
|
16.35
|
Wax coated
|
0.00
|
0.56
|
1.18
|
10.05
|
19.65
|
Chitosan1%
|
2.86
|
5.25
|
7.53
|
11.25
|
18.25
|
Chitosan 2%
|
1.97
|
2.68
|
4.09
|
10.55
|
19.12
|
Carboxymethyl cellulose 1%
|
8.70
|
13.04
|
26.41
|
28.27
|
15.75
|
Carboxymethyl cellulose 2%
|
7.33
|
11.39
|
20.41
|
24.56
|
16.12
|
Aloe gel coated
|
4.23
|
9.64
|
10.80
|
18.25
|
17.35
|
No treatments (control)
|
12.22
|
23.61
|
26.41
|
30.79
|
15.50
|
S. Error m±
|
0.565
|
0.579
|
1.474
|
1.168
|
0.676
|
C.D. (P=0.05)
|
0.986
|
1.011
|
2.573
|
2.038
|
1.180
|
(Source: Mandal et al., 2018)

Figure 5. Effects of temperature and relative humidity (RH) on transpiration rate of arils (a) and aril-sacs of pomegranate (b). Different letters indicate a significant difference p = 0.02.
Ethylene Production: Ethylene act as a growth retardant is an important in controlling fruit physiology during its postharvest preservation period. Even though ethylene has such a profound effect on the freshness and flavor of fruits and vegetables (Martinez‐Romero et al., 2007).In many species, ethylene production coincides with fruit ripening and plays a key role in coordinating the various stages of ripening, including pigmentation, smell evolution, and texture (Klee and Giovannoni, 2011).While ripening is the most obvious response to ethylene in ripe fruit, low levels of ethylene exposure cause discoloration of green tissues and decreases life span of commodities like green vegetables and premature fruits (Valenzuela et al., 2017).
Methionine is activated by ATP and is transformed to SAM (S-adenosylmethionine) through the action of SAM synthase. SAM is transformed to ACC (1- aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) in presence of ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC is transformed to ethylene with the help of ACC oxidase (ACO) (Figure 6).
Ethylene production rate: Maturity at harvest, disease prevalence, physical issues, temperatures up to 30 degrees Celsius, and water deficit all contribute to a higher ethylene productivity (Pesis, 2004). Exposure to very lower levels of exogenous ethylene can notably reduce the potential market life of most vegetables (Blanke, 2014). The fruits and vegetables vary in their ethylene production rates (Table 4) (Dhall, 2013).
The role of ethylene on ripening of fruits and vegetables: Noticeable variations were reported in ripening period of tomato due to the different concentrations of Ethephon treatment (500, 1000 and 1500 ppm). Ethylene gas (100 ppm) ripened the fruit in 9 days, achieving the desired red color, desired stiffness, the least decaying, and an acceptable quality (Figure 7) (Dhall and Singh, 2013) in tomato.

Figure 6. Pathway of ethylene biosynthesis with enzymatic action flow chart (Source: Patterson, 2010)
Table 4. Classification of horticultural crops according to ethylene production rates
Class
|
µl C2H4/kg-h at 20OC (68OF)
|
Commodities
|
Very low
|
<0.1
|
Asparagus, cauliflower, leafy vegetables, root vegetables, potato, citrus, grape, jujube, strawberry, pomegranate.
|
Low
|
0.1-1.0
|
Cucumber, eggplant, okra, watermelon, chili, bell pepper, pumpkin, olive, pineapple, blueberry, raspberry
|
Moderate
|
1.0-10.0
|
Tomato, banana, fig, guava, mango, plantain
|
High
|
10.0-100.0
|
Apple, apricot, avocado, kiwifruit, papaya, peach, pear, plum
|
Very high
|
>100.0
|
Sapota, passion fruit, cherimoya
|
(Source: Dhall, 2013)

Figure7. Effects of Ethephon and ethylene gas on ripening (%) of tomato at 20 ± 1°C with 90-95% RH. (Source: Dhall and Singh, 2013).
Postharvest diseases: Infectious diseases that develop after harvest reduce quality and shorten their life span of produce. These can actually occur anywhere in the post-harvest process, from farm to consumer (Singh et al., 2017). A host tissue's physiological condition is closely linked to the onset of postharvest disease (Singh et al., 2017). Both bacteria and fungi, with the exception of some root crops, are the most common pathogens that attack produce. However, the main postharvest losses are caused by fungi, such as Alternaria, Aspergillus, Colletotrichum, Botrytis, Monilinia, Diplodia, Penicillium, Rhizopus, Phomopsis, Mucor, and Sclerotinia, and bacteria, such as Pseudomonas andErwinia (Barkai-Golan, 2005; Sharma et al., 2009). The juicy nature of fruits and vegetables make them suitable to be easily affected by these organisms (Elias et al., 2010).
At temperature 25°C±2 and 45% relative humidity (RH), Cristina et al. (2018) tested the effects of citrus extracts on the shelf life of tomatoes. The results showed that under control conditions, the percentage of losses was highest on day 13 and gradually decreased thereafter. This trend was observed throughout the duration of the study. However, after evaluation of citrus extract treatment with different doses it was clear that damage did not exceed 80% (Figure 8; Cristina1 et al., 2018).

Figure 8. Percentage of losses of tomato damaged by different pathogens as influenced by different concentrations of citrus extract. (Source: Cristina1 et al., 2018)
The dark blue column is T1 (control=0); the red column is T2 (666 ppm); the green column is T3 (1000 ppm); the purple column is T4 (2000 ppm); the sky blue column is the T5 (4000 ppm); and the orange column is T6 (8000 ppm).
Management techniques to improve postharvest quality: The key purposes of postharvest management technique are to prevent the deterioration of horticultural commodity as much as possible and to ensure maximum market value. The technology involved in postharvest management of fruits and vegetables are difficult because the products are different in structure, maturity stage, physiological status and perishability (Kays and Paull, 2004). However, some commonly used postharvest management techniques are summarized below:
Modification of storage environments: The term-controlled atmosphere (CA) or modified atmosphere (MA) refers to create an atmospheric composition around the produce which is different from normal air by adding or removing gases such as, O2 (below 5%), CO2 (above 3%), N2 and ethylene (Kader and Saltveit, 2003). Advantageous effects of CA or MA storage are slowing down respiration, ethylene production and action and thus delay ripening and increase storage life (Irtwange, 2006). Gas control is more precise in CA than MA (Wu, 2010). Storage conditions in a controlled atmosphere that are recommended for a variety of fruits and vegetables are listed in Table 5. (Rama and Narasimham, 2003; Irtwange, 2006). This amount is determined by the weight, package permeability, and rate of product respiration. CA/MA is also used to regulate the transpiration rate of different fruits and vegetables. For storing fresh vegetables, Modified Atmosphere Packet with 6% O2 and 11% CO2 at 13°C are employed. At 13°C, spinach kept in ordinary bags (the control) ceased to be useable after 7 days, but spinach kept in MAP ceased to be usable after 9 days (Batziakas et al., 2020).
Vacuum packaging: Before sealing, air is removed from the package using the vacuum packaging method. This process entails packing things in plastic film, releasing the air, and then sealing the container (Perdue and Marcondes, 2009). The impact of several packaging methods, including vacuum and modified environment packaging, on the longevity of guava storage (cv. Hisar Safeda) was studied by Rana et al., (2018). Fruit respiration was increased with increasing period of storage at low temperature. It was maximum (27.8 ml/h/kg) in control fruits by 18th day of storage and then decreased to 23.5 ml/h/kg by 21 days of storage. Individual wrapping decreases the respiration rate significantly (Figure 9) in guava. At low temperature, among different wrapping methods, minimum respiration rate in vacuum pack followed by modified atmosphere pack was observed (Figure 8; Rana et al., 2018).
Chemical treatments: Some chemicals such as 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), Salicylic acid (SA) (Madhay et al., 2018), ClO2 gas (Guo, 2014), NO fumigation (Ku et al., 2000) etc. are also used to decrease the respiration and ethylene production as well as interrupt fruit ripening and increases shelf life of fruits and vegetables in different countries without any negative health impact (Barua et al., 2015; Manjunatha et al., 2012).
Table 5. Recommended CA/MA potential for benefits during storage and transport of selected fruits and vegetables
Produce
|
Temperature (°C)
|
Controlled atmosphere (CA) or Modified atmosphere (MA)
|
Potential for benefit (*)
|
O2 (%)
|
CO2 (%)
|
Apple (Malus pumila)
|
0-2
|
2-3
|
1-5
|
A
|
Banana (Musa spp.)
|
12-16
|
2-5
|
2-5
|
A
|
Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L)
|
5-10
|
2-3
|
4-7
|
C
|
Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. L.)
|
0-5
|
1-2
|
5-10
|
A
|
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea)
|
0-5
|
2-3
|
3-6
|
A
|
Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis)
|
0-5
|
2-5
|
2-5
|
C
|
Carrot (Daucus carota)
|
0-5
|
None
|
None
|
D
|
Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)
|
8-12
|
3-5
|
0
|
C
|
Lemon (Citrus limon)
|
10-15
|
5-10
|
0-10
|
B
|
Mango (Mangifera indica)
|
10-15
|
5
|
5
|
C
|
Orange (Citrus sinensis)
|
5-10
|
5-10
|
0-5
|
C
|
Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)
|
8-10
|
3-5
|
0
|
B
|
Onion (Allium cepa)
|
0
|
3
|
5
|
C
|
Papaya (Carica papaya)
|
10-15
|
2-5
|
5-8
|
C
|
Potato (Solanum tuberosum)
|
4-12
|
None
|
None
|
D
|
Pineapple (Ananas comosus)
|
5-10
|
2-5
|
5-10
|
C
|
Radish (Raphanus sativus)
|
0-5
|
None
|
None
|
D
|
Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa)
|
0-5
|
5-10
|
15-20
|
A
|
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea)
|
0-5
|
21
|
10-20
|
B
|
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)
|
8-12
|
1-5
|
0
|
B
|
*A= Excellent, B= Good, C= Fair, D= without benefit; Source: Rama and Narasimham, 2003; Irtwange, 2006.

Figure 9. Respiration rate of guava stored at low temperature for 21 days in Vacuum pack and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) at 7±3°C (Different letters are significantly different at P<0.05).
Chemical application to control respiration and ethylene production: Salicylic acid (SA) and 5-sulfosalicylic acid (SSA) were applied to guava fruits of the cv. Lalit at rates of 1 mM and 2 mM, respectively, and held at 10°C for 12 3 days followed storage under ambient condition (20 2°C, 3 days), acting as shelf-life stimulation period. The salicylic acid treatments inhibited the respiration rate and also slowed down the onset of the respiratory climacteric to 6 ± 3 and 9 ± 3 days of storage in 1 and 2 mM SA or SSA treatments, respectively (Figure 10a) (Madhav et al., 2018; Guo, 2014). Tomato fruits at the mature green phase were treated with ClO2 gas in a wrapped container for 12 hr., and then stored at 23°C with 85% relative humidity (RH) for 23 days. The results indicated that use of ClO2 gas was effective in dropping ethylene production than control fruit reaching maximum at day 9 (Figure 10b) (Madhav et al., 2018; Guo, 2014).

|

|
Figure 10a: Impact of salicylic acid treatments on respiration rate of guava (T1-SA @ 1 mM, T2-SA @ 2 mM, T3-SSA @ 1 mM, T4-SSA @ 2 mM and control).
|
Figure 10b: Effects of ClO2 treatment on ethylene production in tomato fruit at the mature green stage. Mean values ± standard deviation of three replicated measurements.
|
Table 6. Postharvest life of strawberries at 10°C in a MAP with high CO2 and low O2 levels with NO gas.
Atmosphere type
|
Postharvest life (days)
|
Air control
|
4.0
|
MAP
|
7.2
|
10 µL/L NO in air
|
6.0
|
10 µL/L NO in MAP
|
10.7
|
20 µL/L NO in MAP
|
10.3
|
LSD. (P = 0.05)
|
1.21
|
(Source: Soegiarto and Wills, 2006)
Postharvest disease control: Nitric oxide (NO) has profound effect in reducing mold growth and red color loss which are accountable for quality losses of strawberry, and it has also antimicrobial activity (Nathan and Shiloh, 2000). In comparison to air storage, the combined effects of NO and low oxygen storage greatly extended the shelf life of strawberries (Table 6) (Soegiarto and Wills, 2006).
Edible coating: Edible coating is a preservation technique through which the storage life of fruits and vegetables can be significantly increased even though maintaining the original quality of the product during storage (Baldwin, 1994). A chart of some edible coating materials is shown in Table 7 (Modified from Vaishali et al., 2019) along with their functions and suitability to different fruits and vegetables.
Table 7. List of some edible coating with their function.
|
Name of edible coating
|
Function
|
Fruits and vegetables
|
1.
|
Lipid based coating
|
|
|
- Wax coating (carnauba wax, bees wax, paraffin wax).
|
Reduce moisture loss
|
Apple, cucumber, eggplant, okra, tomato, carrot etc.
|
2.
|
Polysaccharide based coating
|
|
|
- Starch and its derivatives
|
Reduce respiration
|
Strawberry
|
- Cellulose and its derivatives
|
Maintain crispness and flavor
|
Apple, carrot
|
- Seaweed extracts (Alginates)
|
Retarding shrinkage, reduce oxidative rancidity
|
Apple, grapes
|
- Chitosan (2-amino-2deoxy-ßD-glucan)
|
Decrease respiration rate, antimicrobial activity
|
Cucumber, tomato
|
- Aloe vera
|
Antifungal, control respiration and transpiration
|
Table grapes
|
3.
|
Protein based coating
|
|
|
- Plant origin (zein and soy)
|
Lower permeability to water vapor and good O2 barrier
|
Eggplant
|
- Animal origin (whey and casein)
|
Good O2 barrier
|
Apple, asparagus, strawberry
|
Source: Modified from Vaishali et al., (2019).
Conclusions: Knowledge of the post-harvest physiology of fruits and vegetables has an immense contribution in taking steps to reduce post-harvest loss. Produces showing high respiration and high ethylene production have lower shelf-life with low quality. The study revealed that keeping fresh fruits and vegetables after harvest in a relatively lower temperature condition with high atmospheric humidity reduces the post-harvest losses of horticultural crops, especially fruits and vegetables.
Furthermore, high temperature and high humidity favor disease and insect pest infestation and is one of the vital factors to cause severe post-harvest losses. Food security and nutritional quality of produce can be ensured by minimizing post-harvest losses of fruits and vegetables through proper post-harvest management including control atmosphere or modified atmosphere (CA/MA) storage, vacuum packing, chemical treatments and disease control.
Conflict of interest: The authors say they have no conflicting interests.
Author contribution: This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Authors JF and MIH designed the conceptual framework of study, performed relevant literature search and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Author MR, TA, SP, MRI and DD drawn the pictures and assisted in the formulation of tabular constituents. Authors SRS reviewed and rewrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
REFERENCES
- Aindongo, W.V., O.J. Caleb, P.V. Mahajan, M. Manley and U.L. Opara (2014). Effects of storage conditions on transpiration rate of pomegranate aril-sacs and arils. South Afr. J. Plant Soil, 31(1): 7-11. org/10.1080/02571862.2014.868049
- Alkan, N. and A.M. Fortes (2015). Insights into molecular and metabolic events associated with fruit response to postharvest fungal pathogens. Frontiers in Plant Sci., 6: p. 889. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00889
- Alkan, N., G. Friedlander, D. Ment, D. Prusky and R. Fluhr (2015). Simultaneous transcriptome analysis of C olletotrichum gloeosporioides and tomato fruit pathosystem reveals novel fungal pathogenicity and fruit defense strategies. New Phytologist, 205 (2): p. 801-815. doi: 10.1111/nph.13087
- Baldwin, E.A. (1994). Edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: past, present and future. of Food Science and Technology, 1: p. 25-28.
- Barkai-Golan, R. (2005). Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables. A Division of Reed Elsevier India, Pvt. Limited, New Delhi.
- Barua, S., T. Rahi, E. Ullah, D. Ghosh and S. Ahmed (2015). Delay in fruit ripening: a promising approach for reduction of spoilage and use of hazardous chemicals in Bangladesh. J. of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR), 6 (4): p. 163-173. http://www.innspub.net
- Batziakas, K. G., S. Singh, K. Ayub, Q. Kang, J.K. Brecht, C.L. Rivard and E.D. Pliakoni (2020). Reducing Postharvest Losses of Spinach Stored at Nonoptimum Temperatures with the Implementation of Passive Modified Atmosphere Packaging. Science, 1(aop): p. 1-10.doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14732-19
- Blanke, M.M. (2014). Reducing ethylene levels along the food supply chain: a key to reducing food waste. Sci. Food and Agri. 94: p. 2357–2361. doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6660
- Bodbodak, S. and M. Moshfeghifar (2016). Advances in controlled atmosphere storage of fruits and vegetables. In Eco-Friendly Technology for Postharvest Produce Quality, Academic Press: p. 39-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804313-4.00002-5
- Brummell, D.A. and P.M. Toivonen (2018). Postharvest Physiology of Vegetables. Handbook of Vegetables and Vegetable Processing, p. 223. doi.org/10.1002/9781119098935.ch9
- Choudhury, A., P.G. Jeelani, N. Biswal and R. Chidambaram (2019). Application of Bionanocomposites on Horticultural Products to Increase the Shelf Life. In: Polymers for Agri-Food Applications. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19416:1-25.
- Cristina, R. A., J.J. Reyes-Perez, H.M.L. Guillermo, M.A. Bernardo and R.P.E. Omar (2018). Control of phytopathogenic microorganisms of postharvest in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) with the use of citrus extract. DOI: 10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001018
- DeLong, J.M. R.K. and Prange (2003). Postharvest Physiology Storage. Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, p. 823–835. doi:10.1016/b0-12-227050-9/00079-x
- Dhall, R.K. (2013). Ethylene in Postharvest Quality Management of Horticultural Crops: A Review. Research and Reviews: A J. of Crop Science and Technology, 2(2): p. 9-24. ISSN: 2319-3395
- Dhall, R.K. and P. Singh (2013). Effect of ethephon and ethylene gas on ripening and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) during cold storage. of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 3(6): p. 1. doi: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000244
- Diaz-Perez, J.C. (2019). Transpiration. In Postharvest Physiology and Biochemistry of Fruits and Vegetables, Woodhead Publishing: p. 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813278-4.00008-7
- Elhadi, M.Y. (2019). Introduction. In Postharvest physiology and biochemistry of fruits and vegetables, Woodhead Publishing, p. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813278-4.00008-7
- Elias, S.N.K., M.W. Shaw and F.M. Dewey (2010). Persistent symptomless, systemic and seed-borne infection of lettuce by Botrytis cinerea. European J. of Plant Pathology 126(1): p. 61-71.: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9524-1
- Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2020). Cellular respiration. Encyclopaedia Britannica, inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/cellular-respiration. (Accessed on 05. 08. 2020).
- Fischer, M.H. (1905). The Toxic Effects of Formaldehyde and Formalin. of Experimental Medicine, 6: p. 487-518.
- Gross, K.C., C.Y. Wang and M.E. Saltveit (2016). The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
- Guo, Q., B. Wu, X. Peng, J. Wang, Q. Li, J. Jin and Y. Ha (2014). Effects of chlorine dioxide treatment on respiration rate and ethylene synthesis of postharvest tomato fruit. Postharvest Biology andTechnology,93:p.9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.01.013
- Hassan, M.K. (2010). A guide to postharvest handling of fruits and vegetables. In Postharvest handling of fruits and vegetables, p. 46-53.
- Hossain, M.A., M.M. Karim and S.A. Juthee (2020). Postharvest physiological and biochemical alterations in fruits: a review. Fundamental and Applied Agriculture 5 (4): 453–469. doi:10.5455/faa.22077
- Irtwange, S.V. (2006). Application of modified atmosphere packaging and related technology in postharvest handling of fresh fruits and vegetables. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR J. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/10565
- Janave, M.T. (2007). Biochemical changes induced due to Staphylococcal infection in spongy Alphonso mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits. Crop Sci Biotech, 10(3): p. 167-174.
- Kader, A.A. and M.E. Saltveit (2003). Atmosphere modification. Postharvest physiology and pathology of vegetables: p. 229-246.
- Kader, A.A. (1992). Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. In: Kader, A.A. (Ed.), Postharvest Biology and Technology: An Overview. University of California, Davis, CA, p. 15-20.
- Kahramanoglu, I. (2017). Introductory chapter: Postharvest physiology and technology of horticultural crops. Postharvest Handling, p. 1-5. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69466
- Kays, S.J. (1991). Metabolic processes in harvested products. In Postharvest physiology of perishable plant products Springer US, 75-142.
- Kays, S.J. and R.E. Paull (2004). Metabolic process in harvested products. Postharvest biology. Exon Press, Athens, GA, In, p. 79–136. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/65829
- Khan, Academy. (2020). https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/cellular-respiration-and fermentation/overview-of-cellular-respiration-steps/a/steps-of-cellular-respiration. (Accessed on 05. 08. 2020).
- Kitazawa, H., S. Motoki, T. Maeda, Y. Ishikawa, Y. Hamauzu, K.I. Matsushima and Y. Kyutoku (2011). Effects of storage temperature on the postharvest quality of three asparagus cultivars harvested in spring. of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 80(1): p. 76-81. www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jjshs1
- Klee, H.J. and J.J. Giovannoni (2011). Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annual review of genetics, 45: p. 41-59. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132507
- Kramer, P.J. and J.S. Boyer (1995). Water Relations of Plants and Soils. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
- Ku, V.V., R.B. Wills and Y.A.Y. Leshem (2000). Use of nitric oxide to reduce postharvest water loss from horticultural produce. The J. of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 75(3): p.268-270. doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2000.11511235
- Lumen learning. (2020). Biology for major I Module 6: Metabolic Pathways. The J. of Cell Biology. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-biology1/chapter/reading-electron-transport-chain. (Accessed on 05. 08. 2020).
- Madhav, J.V., S. Sethi, R.R. Sharma and A. Nagaraja, (2018). Impact of salicylic acid treatments on storage quality of guava fruits cv. Lalit during storage. International J. of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(9): p. 2390-2397.
- Mahajan P.V., F.A.R. Oliviera and I. Macedo (2008). Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the transpiration rate of the whole mushrooms. of Food Engineering, 84: p. 281–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.05.021
- Mandal, D., L. Sailo, T.K. Hazarika and A.C. Shukla (2018). Effect of edible coating on shelf life and quality of local mango cv. Rangkuai of Mizoram. Research on Crops, 19(3): p. 419-424. DOI : 10.31830/2348-7542.2018.0001.10
- Manjunatha, G., K.J. Gupta, V. Lokesh, L.A. Mur and B. Neelwarne (2012). Nitric oxide counters ethylene effects on ripening fruits. Plant signaling and behavior, 7(4): p. 476-483. DOI: 10.4161/psb.19523
- Martinez‐Romero, D., G. Bailén, M. Serrano, F. Guillén, J.M. Valverde, P. Zapata, S. Castillo and D. Valero (2007). Tools to maintain postharvest fruit and vegetable quality through the inhibition of ethylene action: a review. Rev. Food Sci &Nutr., 47: p. 543–560. doi.org/10.1080/10408390600846390
- (2020). Diagram Glycolysis Pathway. https://myflyingboxandme.blogspot.com/2019/12/diagram-glycolysis-pathway.html. (Accessed on 05.08. 2020)
- Mishra, V.K. and T.V. Gamage (2007). Postharvest physiology of fruit and vegetable,s MS Rahman (London: CRC press): p. 19-48.
- Nathan, C. and M.U. Shiloh (2000). Reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in the relationship between mammalian hosts and microbial pathogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(16): p. 8841-8848.
- Nunes, M.C.D.N. and J.P. Emond (2002). Storage temperature. Postharvest physiology and pathology of vegetables (Vol. 123): CRC Press.
- Patterson, R.J. (2010). Fruit growth, ripening and postharvest physiology (chap. 11). Plant science societies. Plants in Action 1st Edition, p. 19-36.
- Pedreschi, R. (2017). Postharvest Proteomics of Perishables. Proteomics in Food Science, 3–16. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804007-2.00001-1.
- Perdue, R. and J. Marcondes (2009). Vacuum packaging. Yam, KL, Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology, Wiley (published 2010).
- Pesis, E. (2004). International Research and Development Course on Postharvest Biology and Technology. The Volcani center, Israel, p. 422–426.
- Pesis, E., M. Ackerman, R. Ben-Arie, O. Feygenberg, X. Feng, A. Apelbaum and D. Prusky (2002). Ethylene involvement in chilling injury symptoms of avocado during cold storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 24(2): p. 171-181. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09255214
- Rama, M. V. and P. Narasimham (2003). Controlled-Atmosphere Storage. Effects on Fruit and Vegetables.
- Rana, S., S. Siddiqui and K. Gandhi (2018). Effect of individual vacuum and modified atmosphere packaging on shelf life of guava. J. Chem. Stud, 6(2): p. 966-972. IJCS 2018; 6(2): 966-972
- Saltveit, M.E. (1999). Effect of ethylene on quality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharv Biol andTechnol, 15: p. 279–292.
- Saltveit, M. E. (2016). Respiratory metabolism. In The Commercial Storage of Fruits, Vegetables, and Florist and Nursery Stocks, Edited by Kenneth C. Gross, Chien Yi Wang, and Mikal Saltveit. Agriculture Handbook Number 66 United States Department of Agriculture, p. 68-75.
- Saltveit, M.E. (2019). Respiratory metabolism. In Postharvest physiology and biochemistry of fruits and vegetables, Woodhead Publishing: p. 73-91.
- Sarma, P.K. (2018). Postharvest Losses of Tomato: A Value Chain Context of Bangladesh. International J. of Agricultural Education and Extension, 4(1): p. 085-092. www.premierpublishers.org
- Sharma, R.R., D. Singh and R. Singh (2009). Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: a review. Biol. Control 2009 (50): p. 205–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.001
- Silva, E. (2008). Respiration and ethylene and their relationship to postharvest handling. Wholesale success: a farmer's guide to selling, postharvest handling, and packing produce (Midwest edition). Available online at: http://www. Family farmed. org/retail. html.
- Singh, B.K., K.S. Yadav and A. Verma (2017). Impact of postharvest diseases and their management in fruit crops: An overview. Bio Innov, 6: p. 749-760.
- Soegiarto, L. and R.B.H. Wills (2006). Effect of nitric oxide, reduced oxygen and elevated carbon dioxide levels on the postharvest life of strawberries and lettuce. Australian J. of Experimental Agriculture, 46(8): p. 1097-1100. org/10.1071/EA05059
- Swenson, E.R. (2018). Does Aerobic Respiration Produce Carbon Dioxide or Hydrogen Ion and Bicarbonate? Anesthesiology: The J. of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 128(5): p. 873-879.
- Tano, K., A. Kamenan and J. Arul (2005). Respiration and transpiration characteristics of selected fresh fruits and vegetables. Agronomie Africaine, 17(2): p. 103-115.
- Vaishali, S. H. P., V. Chaudhary and M. Kumar (2019). Importance of edible coating on fruits and vegetables: A review. of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(3): p. 4104-4110. JPP 2019; 8(3): 4104-4110
- Valenzuela, J.L., S. Manzano, F. Palma, F. Carvajal, D. Garrido and M. Jamilena (2017). Oxidative stress associated with chilling injury in immature fruit: postharvest technological and biotechnological solutions. International J. of Molecular Sciences, 18(7): p. 1467. doi:10.3390/ijms18071467
- Wendimagegn (2020). Causes of post – harvest losses of horticultural crops in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Press Agency. https://www.press.et/english/?p=23288#. (Accessed on 20. 08. 2020).
- Wikipedia (2020). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postharvest#:~:text=In%20agriculture%2C%20postharvest%20handling%20is,plant%2C%20it%20begins%20to%20deteriorate (Accessed on 22. 10. 2020).
- Wills, R., B. McGlasson, D. Graham and D. Joyce (2007). Post-harvest 5th Ed: An Introduction to the Physiology and Handling of Fruits, Vegetables and Ornamentals.
- World Health Organization (2019). Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases. E-Library of Evidence for Nutrition Actions (eLENA). https://www.who.int/elena/titles/fruit_vegetables_ncds/en/ . (Accessed on 20. 08. 2020).
- Wu, C.T. (2010). An overview of postharvest biology and technology of fruits and vegetables. In Technology on Reducing Postharvest Losses and Maintaining Quality of Fruits and Vegetables: Proceedings of 2010 AARDO Workshop.
- Yahaya, S.M. and A. Mardiyya (2019). Review of postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables. J. Sci. Tech. Res, 13: p. 10192-10200.
|