GENETIC DIVERSITY OF VIETNAMESE NATIVE CHICKEN BREEDS BASED ON MITOCHONDRIAL DNA D-LOOP SEQUENCE
T. T. B. Nguyen1, N. H. Duc1, D. V. A. Khoa2, N. H. Tuong2, H. Reyer3, K. Wimmers3, D.T.N. Thuy4 and N. T. D. Thuy4*
1 Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam; 2College of Agriculture, Can Tho University, Vietnam.
3FBN, Dummerstorf, Germany;
4Institute of Biotechnology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
*Corresponding author’s email: ntdthuy@ibt.ac.vn
ABSTRACT
Genetic diversity of four Vietnamese indigenous chicken breeds including Lien Minh (GLM), Dong Tao (GDT), Nhan (GNH) and Chin Cua (G9C) were evaluated using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop sequence polymorphism. 1,050 bp of D-loop region of 66 individuals was amplified, sequenced, and analyzed. Comparative alignment results showed that the four local chickens shared 96.6% - 99.9% nucleotide identity with each other. Results of D-loop sequencing analysis revealed 53 variable sites (gaps included) in native Vietnamese chickens as compared to reference sequence (AB268540). Among them, there were six nucleotide deletions, ten nucleotide insertions (positions) and 37 nucleotide substitutions (sites). The estimated haplotype diversity (Hd) within breed was relatively high, ranged from 0.824 (GNH) to 0.913 (GLM). Phylogenetic study based on hypervariable region of 455 bp D-loop showed that all Vietnamese native chicken breeds were distributed over 16 haplotypes belonged to five haplogroups A, B, C, D and E, of which clade B was dominant. Individual of GLM, GDT, and G9C breeds clustered mainly in clade B (34/48) and GNH chicken (18 individuals) belonged to clade C and D. This study shows the relatively high genetic diversity of native Vietnamese chicken breeds and contributes to the conservation and breeding strategy of indigenous chicken in Vietnam.
Keywords: DNA D-loop sequence, genetic diversity, Vietnamese indigenous chickens.
http://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2022.3.0466
Published first online October 19. 2021
INTRODUCTION
Domestic chicken is the most widely distributed species of all livestock in the rural households in Southeast and East Asia. Diversity of the chicken genetic resource is important for the better conservation of indigenous chicken breeds. Mitochondrial DNA sequence is an useful tool to investigate the genetic background of both closely related species and individuals within species (Harpending et al. 1998). Previous studies used mtDNA showed the high genetic diversity of local chickens (Liu et al. 2006; Oka et al. 2007; Cuc et al. 2011) and multiple origins of domestic chicken in East Africa (Mwacharo et al. 2011), Bangladesh (Bhuiyan et al. 2013), Oman (Al-Qamashoui et al. 2014) and Sweden (Englund et al. 2014). In Asia, Liu et al. (2006) were the first to demonstrate that several sub-species of red jungle fowl from South and Southeast Asia and surrounding areas were involved in the genetic makeup of modern chickens. Asian native chicken representatives revealed into nine divergent clades from A to I (Liu et al. 2006). While Japanese native chickens and some varieties were from other parts of Southeast Asia identified into seven clades from A to G (Oka et al. 2007). The classification of Oka et al. (2007) showed that the four clades E, B, C, and A were associated with four clades B, A, D and E according to the study of Liu et al. (2006) and Cuc et al. (2011). Cuc et al. (2011) analyzed the 455 bp sequence of D-loop of nine indigenous Vietnamese chicken breeds (H’mong, Mia, Ri, Ho, Dong Tao, Te, Choi, Ac, Tau Vang) and two chickens of Chinese origin (Luong Phuong, Tam Hoang) showed that Vietnamese native chickens spanning in eight clades (A-I), in which, they were distributed in two main branches (A and B).
Native Vietnamese chicken possesses various good characteristics such as: adaptability to harsh conditions, high disease resistance, adaptation to poor nutrition, the quality of meat and eggs, and many rare genetic resources. However, due to traditional poultry farming with small-scale production and to the imported chicken breeds, may have led to introgression of exotic chicken breeds into Vietnamese gene pool, so rare genetic resources are at risk of being hybridized. The GLM is one of native breeds, with a number of good characteristics and contribution to the economic value of rural citizens of Lien Minh, Tran Chau, and Cat Hai districts (Cat Ba Island). G9C breed is a multi-toes chicken (5-9 toes) with decreasing quantity and have been conserved at the National Park of Xuan Son, Tan Son District, Phu Tho Province. The GNH chickens are aggressive and brave so people wish to have them in chicken fighting games. GNH’s legs are green colors, whereas, GDT is a special chicken species with yellow big and rough legs (Su et al. 2004). In recent years, Vietnam has a program to conserve indigenous genetic diversity, in which GLM, G9C, GNH and GDT chickens are on the preserved list. Therefore, our study on the genetic diversity of these chicken breeds has significant contribution to the national program of conservation, development, and trademark registration of local breed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals: Four Vietnamese indigenous chickens, including GLM, GDT, GNH and G9C were used for analysis in our study (Table 1). Sampling sites were primitive origin of the variety or at the conservation site of the variety. Samples were taken from different families to minimize related individuals. Number of samples and sampling locations are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Sample information
Breed
|
Sample code
|
Special morphological characteristics
|
Study area
|
GenBank accession no.
|
Reference
|
Lien Minh
(n= 24)
|
GLM 01 - 24
|
Feathers at the tip of the wing and tail are black
|
Lien Minh village, Cat Hai, Hai Phong City, Northern of Vietnam
|
KY172116 –
KY172121; MH425591- MH425608
|
This study
|
Chin Cua
(n= 6)
|
G9C 01 - 06
|
Many toes (5-9 fingers)
|
Phu Tho provincial, Northern of Vietnam
|
KR338974-
KR338978
|
This study
|
Dong Tao
(n= 18)
|
GDT 01 - 18
|
Yellow giant legs
|
Khoai Chau District, Hung Yen, Northern of Vietnam
|
MH447149- MH447166
|
This study
|
Ga Nhan (n= 18)
|
GNH 01 - 18
|
Green leg’s color
|
Ca Mau provincial, Southern of Vietnam
|
MH425609- MH425626
|
This study
|
Reference samples
Haplotype
|
GenBank accession no
|
Reference
|
A1
|
AB114069
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
B1
|
AB007744
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
C1
|
AB114070
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
D1
|
AY588636
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
E1
|
AB114076
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
F1
|
AF512285
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
G1
|
AF512288
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
H1
|
D82904
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
I1
|
AB009434
|
Liu et al., 2006
|
A1-A9
|
GU564361 - GU564369
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
B1-B8
|
GU564370 - GU564377
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
C
|
GU564378
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
D1-D5
|
GU564379- GU564383
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
E1-E9
|
GU564384- GU564392
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
F
|
GU564393
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
G1-G2
|
GU564394- GU564395
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
I1-I2
|
GU564396- GU564397
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
Sample collection: Blood samples were taken from the wing vein and collected in anti-coagulant tubes with EDTA (Macrogen) and stored at 4oC. Genomic DNA was extracted by a standard procedure using Proteinase K digestion followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and precipitation with ethanol (Ausubel et al. 1995). The quantity and quality of genomic DNA were checked with UV spectrophotometer and agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA samples were stored at -20oC until analysis.
PCR amplification and sequencing: Primer sequences used for amplification of the D-loop region are following: F: 5’-AGGACTACGGCTTGAAAAGC-3’; R:5’-CATCTTGGCATCTTCAGTGCC-3’ (Eriksson et al., 2008). PCR was performed in a 25 µl reaction containing 1x PCR Buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.25 mM each dNTPs, 5 pM primers, 1U Taq-polymerase (Fermentas), and 100 ng genomic DNA. In PCR amplification, an initial denaturation at 94oC for three minutes followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94oC for 45 seconds, annealing at 56oC for 45 seconds and extension at 72oC for 90 seconds, and an additional extension of 72oC for seven minutes were applied. For DNA sequencing, PCR products were purified using a Agencourt AMpure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter). Purified PCR products were used for sequencing on ABI Sequencer (3100 Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems).
Analysis: Nucleotide sequences were identified with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (Altschul et al. 1990). Multiple nucleotide alignments were carried out with BioEdit (Hall, 1999). The diversity parameters, including the nucleotide diversity haplotypes, number of polymorphic sites, number of haplotypes, and haplotype diversity of all sequences were estimated using DnaSP v.5 software (Librado and Rozas, 2009). Neighbor Joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was conducted using MEGA version 6.1 (Tamura et al. 2007). Phylogenetic tree analysis was constructed based on classification of Liu et al. (2006) with reference mtDNA sequences from the GenBank database as listed in Table 1.
RESULTS
1,050 bp mtDNAD-loop sequences from total 66 individuals of GLM, G9C, GNH, and GDT chickens were submitted in GenBank (accession numbers listed in Table 1). Pairwise comparison showed that the Vietnamese native chicken breeds shared high nucleotide identity with the domestic chicken, which deposited in the GenBank (Table 2). The four native breeds shared 96.6% - 99.9% nucleotide identity with each other. There were higher nucleotide identities (97.4% –99.1%) between GLM and GDT chickens, but only 96.6% – 97.3% identities between GNH and GDT chickens. In which, the GNH chicken breed shared the highest 99.8% - 100% nucleotide identity with each other, 99.6% - 100% for G9C chickens, 99.1% - 100% for GDT chicken, and the lowest for Lien Minh chickens 98.6% - 100%.
Nucleotide variations among mtDNA D-loop sequences of GLM, GDT, G9C, and GNH breeds, and representative sequence (AB268540) are shown in Figure 1. The results show that, the average percentage of polymorphic site was 5.1% (53/1,050). Out of 53 sequence variations, nucleotide deletions at positions (50-54 and 861), ten nucleotide insertion positions and 37 nucleotide substitution sites were observed. Among that, all GDT chickens shared nucleotide deletions at positions 50 – 54 as well as four nucleotide insertions at 838 (G), 859 (C), 866 (T) and 867 (T/A) sites, and nucleotide substitution at positions 56, 58, 62 (A↔G), 77 (T↔C) and 862 (A ↔ T). GNH characterized by nucleotide substitution at positions 1027, 1030 (A ↔ C), 1028 (C ↔ T), and 1029 (T ↔ A).

Fig. 1. Nucleotide polymorphisms observed in the D-loop of the Vietnamese chicken sequences (1,050 bp). The first column signifies identification number of samples and references chickens. Vertically oriented numbers indicate the variable sites position. Dots (.) indicate identity with the reference sequence (GenBank accession number AB268540) while different base letters denote substitutions. Black line – nucleotide deletion, continue black line ____ no information on nucleotide sequence.
Table 2. Nucleotide identity of D-loop sequence among samples

GNH: Nhan chicken; GLM: Lien Minh chicken; GDT: Dong Tao chicken; G9C: Chin Cua chicken.(n =): The number of individuals, which share 100% nucleotide identities
A total of 27 haplotypes in 66 individuals from four Vietnam native chickens based on 1,050 bp of mtDNA D-loop sequence, and all these haplotypes belong to five clades. In which, GLM chicken had 12 haplotypes, GDT chicken had seven haplotypes, GNH chicken had five haplotypes, and G9C chicken belonged to three haplotypes. Non-significant Tajima’s D were observed in all breed chickens of this studied (Table 3), indicating that neither balancing selection nor purifying selection occurred in all chicken populations. There by suggesting neutral selection is involved. The native Vietnam chickens have been free-range, in which random mating is permitted without farmer’s interest in programmed breeding.
Table 3. Polymorphic sites, haplotype and nucleotide diversity of Vietnamese and Asian chicken breeds-based D-loop sequences.
Breed
|
N
|
S
|
h
|
Hd
|
Pi
|
NC
|
D
|
References
|
Vietnamese chickens
|
GLM
|
24
|
23
|
12
|
0.913± 0.034
|
0.007±0.00082
|
4
|
0.187
|
This study*
|
GDT
|
18
|
11
|
7
|
0.856±0.047
|
0.004±0.00041
|
1
|
1.721
|
GNH
|
18
|
4
|
5
|
0.824±0.045
|
0.001±0.00013
|
1
|
0.153
|
G9C
|
6
|
4
|
3
|
0.867± 0.129
|
0.002±0.00040
|
1
|
0.562
|
Total
|
66
|
37
|
27
|
0.963±0.009
|
0.009 ±0.00041
|
5
|
0.513
|
Other Vietnamese chickens
|
H’Mong
|
20
|
23
|
6
|
0.778
|
|
5
|
|
Cuc et al., 2011
|
Mia
|
20
|
10
|
7
|
0.737
|
|
2
|
|
Ri
|
20
|
22
|
12
|
0.911
|
|
5
|
|
Ho
|
20
|
8
|
4
|
0.615
|
|
2
|
|
Dong Tao
|
20
|
20
|
7
|
0.768
|
|
3
|
|
Te
|
20
|
14
|
5
|
0.716
|
|
2
|
|
Choi
|
19
|
15
|
4
|
0.754
|
|
4
|
|
Ac
|
21
|
13
|
5
|
0.767
|
|
3
|
|
Tau Vang
|
20
|
24
|
13
|
0.942
|
|
6
|
|
Total
|
222
|
43
|
37
|
0.849
|
|
8
|
|
|
HG population
|
106
|
-
|
25
|
0.860
|
0.013
|
6
|
-
|
Bethouly et al., 2009
|
Chinese chickens
|
Beijing Youkei
|
4
|
|
3
|
0.830
|
0.006
|
2
|
|
|
Luke
|
9
|
|
4
|
0.810
|
0.013
|
3
|
|
Dwarf Wugu
|
10
|
|
5
|
0.860
|
0.012
|
3
|
|
Taihe Silky
|
14
|
|
3
|
0.650
|
0.010
|
3
|
|
Jiangbian
|
28
|
|
11
|
0.850
|
0.013
|
4
|
|
Xuchuan
|
50
|
|
10
|
0.869
|
0.009
|
4
|
|
Guo et al., 2017
|
Yunyang
|
24
|
|
9
|
0.812
|
0.011
|
4
|
|
Lushi
|
28
|
|
17
|
0.942
|
0.013
|
4
|
|
Silkia
|
30
|
|
12
|
0.894
|
0.012
|
4
|
|
Black- bone
|
132
|
-
|
28
|
0.916
|
0.012
|
4
|
-
|
Laotian chickens
|
Vientiane
|
54
|
23
|
20
|
0.880
|
0.009
|
3
|
|
Kawabe et al., 2014
|
Luang Prabang
|
42
|
10
|
7
|
0.815
|
0.008
|
2
|
|
Pakse
|
33
|
26
|
10
|
0.847
|
0.015
|
5
|
|
Total
|
129
|
37
|
29
|
0854
|
0.010
|
5
|
|
Tibetan chickens
|
Aba
|
36
|
21
|
11
|
0.860
|
0.011
|
|
0.050
|
Zhang et al., 2017
|
Diqing
|
25
|
21
|
9
|
0.760
|
0.011
|
|
-0.403
|
Lasa
|
49
|
33
|
15
|
0.904
|
0.014
|
|
-0.348
|
Shannan
|
33
|
21
|
8
|
0.642
|
0.008
|
|
-0.871
|
Total
|
276
|
42
|
42
|
0,925
|
0.016
|
7
|
-0.138
|
Thai chickens
|
Pra-dhu-hang-dam
|
80
|
|
11
|
0.832
|
0.005
|
4
|
1.319
|
Piyanat et al., 2018
|
Leun-hang-khao
|
76
|
|
13
|
0.818
|
0.006
|
5
|
0.762
|
|
Chee
|
34
|
|
4
|
0.640
|
0.005
|
3
|
1.370
|
|
Dang
|
30
|
|
8
|
0.782
|
0.005
|
5
|
-0.031
|
|
Total
|
220
|
-
|
23
|
0.861
|
0.006
|
6
|
0.403
|
|
Indonesia chickens
|
Bangkok
|
7
|
53
|
6
|
0.952
|
0.039
|
|
|
Ulfah et al., 2017
|
Bekisar
|
13
|
44
|
9
|
0.936
|
0.029
|
|
|
Burgo
|
14
|
6
|
6
|
0.791
|
0.004
|
|
|
Cemani
|
12
|
3
|
2
|
0.303
|
0.002
|
|
|
Nunukan
|
10
|
5
|
4
|
0.733
|
0.004
|
|
|
Total
|
204
|
76
|
93
|
0.840
|
0.017
|
|
|
Iranian chickens
|
Iranian
|
168
|
22
|
17
|
0.00-0.601
|
0.002
|
|
|
Meydan et al., 2016
|
N: number of samples, S: number of polymorphic sites (excluding sites with gaps), h: Number of haplotypes, Hd: Haplotype diversity, Pi: nucleotide diversity, NC: number of clades, D: Tajima’s test, *)1,050 bp of D-loop sequence had been used for analysis of diversity parameters.
To use Vietnamese chicken sequences as references, Cuc et al. (2011) used 31 D-loop sequences (455 bp) of native Vietnamese chicken, therefore, only 455 bp belonged to hypervariable of D-loop sequence had been used for phylogenetic analysis in our study. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using 66 D-loop sequences along with 41 reference sequences that corresponded to the nine clades defined by Liu et al. (2006) (Fig. 2). The four native breeds of Vietnam used in this study were assigned to the 16 haplotypes of five clades A, B, C, D, and E. Most of GNH chickens were distributed in clades C, which was observed in the majority of fighting and bantam chickens sampled in Indonesia (Oka et al. 2007). However, most of samples (70.8%) of three remaining breeds clustered in clade B. All individuals of G9C chickens were observed in clade E (6/6 samples). However, 24 GLM chickens were distributed in five clades A, B, C, D, and E, but mainly in clade B (58.3%). In particular, no Vietnamese chicken in this study was not found in clades F, G, H, and I.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of Vietnamese native chicken breeds based on 455 bp of D-loop sequence. It was generated by the neighbor‐joining method using MEGA6.1 with bootstrap values for interior clades after 1,000 replications. Different clade and haplotype are indicated. GLM, G9C, GDT and GNH breeds are marked (circle, tetragular, triangular, and square, respectively). Numbers in bracket are number of samples appeared at identical haplotype.
DISCUSSION
In this study, 1,050 bp mtD-loop of Vietnamese chickens had been sequenced and used for analysis of genetic diversity, whereas, phylogenetic tree had been constructed based on 455 bp belonged to hypervariable region.
Comparative alignment results showed high nucleotide identity within four local chickens and other Vietnamese chicken breeds (Cuc et al. 2011). There was also a high nucleotide similarity of D-loop sequences among Vietnamese native chickens and other the local chickens originated from Asian countries (Liu et al. 2006; Oka et al. 2007). Supporting for that, the analysis result also showed higher level of diversity of GLM, GDT, GNH and G9C chickens, which expressed by analyzing parameters S, h, Hd, and Pi (Table 3). The estimated haplotype diversity values (Hd) within breeds ranged from 0.824 (GNH) to 0.913 (GLM) and were similar to those of Asia native chickens. GDT's Hd index from 455 bp is 0.725 ± 0.055, the results of this analysis are quite similar to the results of Cuc et al. (2011) (Dong Tao 0.768). Considering to the number of polymorphic sites, number of haplotypes, haplotype diversity and number of clades, Vietnamese native chickens in this study had relatively high genetic diversity in comparison to other Vietnamese and Asian chicken breeds as shown in Table 3. The genetic information of this study may serve as molecular information for the characterization, conservation and improvement of valuable genetic resource of Vietnamese chickens.
This is the first report on analysis of haplotype diversity and phylogenetic of native chickens GLM, GNH, G9C at the mtDNA level. Liu et al. (2006) showed that, the Asian native chickens were grouped into nine divergent clades from A to I. The Asian chicken breeds also were classified into seven clades from A to G based on full D-loop sequence, (Oka et al. 2007). Vietnamese chickens were identified into eight haplogroups (A to G and I) (Cuc et al. 2011), and Lao chickens were spanned in five clades (A, B, D, F, and I) (Kawabe et al. 2014). In this study, phylogenetic tree analysis was constructed based on classification of Liu et al. (2006) using 455 bp D-loop sequence. A total 27 haplotypes observed in four Vietnam native chickens were grouped in five clades, which were defined by mutational motifs shared by the descendants (Fig. 2).
There were higher nucleotide identities (97.4% - 99.1%) between GDT and GLM, so most of samples of GDT and GLM grouped in the clade B, indicating close genetic closely related these breeds and individuals within breed. These sequence types resembled those observed in Shamo chicken (Oka et al. 2007) and in several Chinese native chicken populations, as reported by Niu et al. (2002). The differences between GLM, and GDT were small, indicating that the genetic diversity was very close in those breeds, the results of their close geographic distance (about 150 km), and because of economical-oriented selection pressure, genetic diversities of GLM and GDT chickens were low. Various studies showed that, clade B were observed in native chickens of South Asia, Chinese, Laotian, Japanese and Indian chickens (Liu et al. 2006; Oka et al., 2007; Cuc et al. 2011; Kawabe et al. 2014), and was not detected in Africa (Miao et al. 2013). The results showed that, G9C chickens like other Chinese breeds Tibetan, Henan cockfighting, Langshan chickens had a single maternal genetic background.
All samples of GNH collected in Ca Mau province, southern part of Vietnam was grouped in clade C and D, which were found in gamecocks from China, Japan, Madagascar and Vietnam. 50% the Choi chickens- game birds were observed in clade D (Cuc et al. 2011). Similar to that, this clade mainly consisted of game birds and 45% of Indian domestic chicken (Liu et al. 2006). With the same green color of shank, the Green-legged Partridgelike (GP) fowl was grouped in two clades, which associated with clade B and E according to classification of Liu (Siwek et al. 2013). On the other hand, the seven haplotypes of GLM in this study were spanned to five clades (A, B, C, D, E). However, most of them clustered in clade B, indicating clade B is predominant. As aforementioned, number of clades found in the Lien Minh chicken similar with other Vietnam breeds such as Choi (four clades), H'Mong (five clades), Ri (five clades) and HG (six clades) (Cuc et al. 2011; Berthouly et al. 2009). Due to traditional poultry farming with small-scale production, and farmers may not be aware of preserving precious genetic resources of indigenous chickens, so they can bring other chicken breeds to raise together. The above can lead to mixed maternal origins occurred in GLM chickens.
Only 3% Vietnamese chickens (GLM) in this study and 2.7% chickens of Cuc' study were assigned to the clade E. In contrast, the majority of Indian, Near Eastern and European breeds were found in this clade (Liu et al. 2006). Diversity of maternal lineages also was found in Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia and East Asia (Miao et al. 2013). In addition, no number of Vietnamese chickens distributed in clades F, G, H and I.
Vietnamese native chickens had relatively high genetic diversity, in which GLM, GNH, GDT showed multiple maternal lineages, whereas G9C grouped in dominant clade B and had a single maternal origin (clade B). The results observed in our study are the genetic information supporting the registration of local breeds and also are valuable understanding of maternal lineages of population/breed. It can help for the improvement of production performance of local chickens by crossbreeding strategies within local or with exotic breeds.
Acknowledgements - This study was funded by Can Tho University Improvement Project supported by a Japanese ODA loan (VN14-P6).
REFERENCES
- Al-Qamashoui B., H. Simianer, I. Kadim and S. Weigend (2014). Assessment of genetic diversity and conservation priority of Omani local chickens using microsatellite markers. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 10: 444-447.
- Altschul S.F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers and D.J. Lipman (1990). Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Bio. 215: 403-410.
- Ausubel F.M., R. Brent, R.E. Kingston, D.D. Moore, J.G. Seidman, J. A. Smith and K. Struhl (1995). Short protocols in molecular biology, 3rd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Berthouly C., G. Leroy, T.N. Van, H.H. Thanh, B. Bed'Hom, B.T. Nguyen, C.C. Vu, F. Monicat, M. Tixier-Boichard, E. Verrier, J. Maillard and X. Rognon (2009). Genetic analysis of local Vietnamese chickens provides evidence of gene flow from wild to domestic populations. BMC Genetics, 10: 1. 5. Bhuiyan M.S., S. Chen, S. Faruque, A.K. Bhuiyan and A. Beja-Pereira (2013). Genetic diversity and maternal origin of Bangladeshi chicken. Mol. Bio. Reports. 40(6): 4123-4128.
- Cuc N.T.K., H. Simianer, L.F. Groeneveld and S. Weigend (2011). Multiple maternal lineages of Vietnamese local chickens inferred by mitochondrial D-loop sequences. Asian Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 24: 155–161.
- Englund T., L. Stromstedt and A.M. Johansson (2014). Relatedness and diversity of nine Swedish local chicken breeds as indicated by the mtDNAD-loop. Hereditas, 151: 229–33.
- Eriksson J., G. Larson, U. Gunnarsson, B. Bed'hom, M. Tixier-Boichard, L. Strömstedt, D. Wright, A. Jungerius, A. Vereijken, E. Randi, P. Jensen and L. Andersson (2008). Identification of the Yellow Skin Gene Reveals a Hybrid Origin of the Domestic Chicken. PLoS Genetics, 4: e1000010.
- Guo H.W., C. Li, X.N. Wang, Z.J. Li, G.R. Sun, G.X. Li, X.J. Liu, X.T. Kang and R.T. Han (2017). Genetic diversity of mtDNA D-loop sequences in four native Chinese chicken breeds. Bri. Poul. Sci. 58(5): 490–497.
- Hall T. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequences alignment editor and analysis program for Window 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41: 95-98.
- Harpending H.C., M.A. Batzer, M. Gurven, L.B. Jorde, A.R. Rogers and S.T. Sherry (1998). Genetic traces of ancient demography. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95: 1961- 1967.
- Kawabe K., R. Worawut, S. Taura, T. Shimogiri, T. Nishida, and S. Okamoto (2014). Genetic Diversity of mtDNA D-loop Polymorphisms in Laotian Native Fowl Populations. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 27(1): 19-23.
- Librado P. and J. Rozas (2009). DnaSP (version 5.0): A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, 25: 1451–1452.
- Liu Y.P., G.S. Wu, Y.G. Yao, Y.W. Miao, G. Luikart, M. Baig, A. Beja-Pereira, Z.L. Ding, M.G. Palanichamy and Y.P. Zhang (2006). Multiple maternal origins of chickens: out of the Asian jungles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol Mol. Phylo. and Evo. 38: 12–19.
- Meydan H., C.P. Jang, M.A. Yildiz and S. Weigend (2016). Maternal Origin of Turkish and Iranian Native Chickens Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Sequences. Asian Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 29(11): 1547–1554.
- Miao Y., M. Peng, G. Wu, Y. Ouyang, Z. Yang, N. Yu, J. Liang, G. Pianchou, A. Beja-Pereira, B. Mitra, M. Palanichamy, M. Baig, T.K. Chaudhuri, Y. Shen, Q. Kong, R. Murphy, Y. Yao and Y. Zhang (2013). Chicken domestication: An updated perspective based on mitochondrial genomes. Heredity, 110: 277–82.
- Mwacharo J.M., G. Biornstad, V. Mobegi, K. Nomura, H. Hanada, T. Amano, H. Jianli, O. Hanotte and K. Nomura (2011). Mitochondrial DNA reveals multiple introductions of domestic chicken in East Africa. Phylo. and Evo. 58(2): 374-382.
- Niu D., Y. Fu, J. Luo, H. Ruan, X.P. Yu, G. Chen and Y.P. Zhang (2002). The origin and genetic diversity of Chinese native chicken breeds. Biochem. Genet. 40(5): 163-174.
- Oka T., Y. Ino, K. Nomura, S. Kawashima, T. Kuwayama, H. Hanada, T. Amano, M. Takada, N. Takahata, Y. Hayashi and F. Akishinonomiya (2007). Analysis of mtDNA sequences shows Japanese native chickens have multiple origins. Anim. Genet. 38: 287–293.
- Piyanat T., S. Kannika and T. Chanin (2018). Genetic diversity analysis of Thai indigenous chickens based on complete sequences of mitochondrial DNA D-loop region. Asian-Australasian Journal of Anim. Sci. 31(6): 804-811.
- Siwek M., D. Wragg, A. Sławin´ska, M. Malek, O. Hanotte and J.M. Mwacharo (2013). Insights into the genetic history of Green-legged Partridgelike fowl: mtDNA and genome-wide SNP analysis. Anim. Genet. 44: 522–532.
- Su V.V., N.V. Thien, D.T. Nhiem, L.V. Ly, N.V. Hai and H.V. Tieu (2004). Atlas of farm animal breeds in Vietnam. Agricultural Publishers, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- Tamura K., J. Dudley, M. Nei, S. Kumar (2007). MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Bio. and Evo. 24: 1596-1599.
- Ulfah M., D. Perwitasari, J. Jakaria, M. Mulado and A. Farajallah (2017). Multiple maternal origins of Indonesian crowing chickens revealed by mitochondrial DNA analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part A,28(2): 254-262.
- Zhang L., P. Zhang, Q. Li, U. Gaur, Y. Liu, Q. Zhu, X. Zhao, Y. Wang, H. Yin, Y. Hu, A. Liu, D. Li (2017). Genetic evidence from mitochondrial DNA corroborates the origin of Tibetan chickens. PloS ONE, 1-11.
|