FORECASTING TOMATO PRODUCTION UNDER CLIMATE VARIABILITY IN PAKISTAN
M. K. Bashir1*, A. U. Malik2, M. U. Farrukh1, S. Hameed1, M. A. Kamran3,4 and K. Ziaf2
1 Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
2 Institute of Horticultural Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
3 US-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Agriculture and Food Security, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
4 Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: khalid450@uaf.edu.pk
ABSTRACT
Pakistan contributes the lowest to per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but is among the five worst affected countries in the world. This paper forecasts tomato production under climate variability in Pakistan. Time series data were collected from Government of Pakistan (GOP), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Bank's online sources. Both quantitative and qualitative techniques were applied to analyze the data. For quantitative analyses, dynamic forecasting techniques were used, and qualitative analyses were carried out using the rapid appraisal method. The results concluded that temperature shocks have adverse dynamics on tomato production as well as prices. An ambiguous role of rainfall was found i.e., in some areas it had positive impact while in other areas had negative impacts. Several issues were identified including limited area of production, low yields, pests and disease stresses, labor shortage, poor water management and lack of modern information. It is suggested that value chain industry of tomato must be developed in tomato growing areas Furthermore, the access of farmers to reliable information about weather dynamics must be ensured.
Keywords: Climate variability, dynamic forecasting, Pakistan, price volatility, tomato production
https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2022.1.0417
Published online June 14, 2021
INTRODUCTION
Climate change adversely affects the economy that was involved in subsistence farming. Lack of financial and technical resources are responsible to slow adaptation to these changes (Paltasingh and Goyari, 2013). Pakistan is one of the lowest contributors to per capita GHG emissions in the world but is among the top 5 worst affected countries in the world (CCPI, 2017). Pakistan’s agricultural economy is most vulnerable to climate change as nearly 18% of the GDP and agro based industry is dependent on this sector. In addition, climatic stress also poses dangers to national food security by changing the pattern of rainfall, temperature and water availability. There is strong evidence that the changing pattern of rainfall and increasing temperature have a substantial impact on crops production (Bakhsh, 2007; FAO, 2013; GOP, 2016). Weather stress had a serious negative impact on food supply (IPCC, 2012; Christensen et al., 2007) and productivity of different crops (Attoh et al. 2014; Cinco et al. 2014). Major agricultural crops in Pakistan are Wheat, Cotton, Rice and Sugarcane. However, some crops like tomato, pulses, and vegetables are cultivated on smaller areas but have huge importance due to their central role in food culture and national food security. Tomato is an important crop for both consumers and farmers that is most affected by weather fluctuations due to its perishability and cause social and political turmoil due to production fluctuations. Pakistan ranks at 34th position in terms of tomato production and 11th in terms of area of production (GOP, 2015a). Most of the tomatoes are grown by small farmers having 1-2 hectares of land. The tomato crop is sensitive to climate variability which results into reduction in number of plants, average yield, and farmer’s income (Schlenker et al., 2005; Furuya et al., 2009). Lack of processing facilities in almost all the provinces negatively impacts producers and consumers. Farmers often get low prices in peak seasons and must face post-harvest losses. On the other hand, consumers must pay exorbitant prices during off seasons and during the periods of low production (Kirby et al., 2016). The climate vulnerable events have adverse impacts on tomato production that is creating ambient conditions for diseases and pests’ attacks, which negatively affect crop yield (Anley et al., 2007). Trend in annual demand and supply scenario of tomato (Figure 1) shows a strong expansion of national tomato demand overtime, however supply was relatively stagnant in recent years.
Data Source: GOP 2016 and 2020
Figure 1: Annual demand, supply of tomato and domestic shortage (000 tons)
Pakistan’s demand for fresh and processed tomato products is expanding annually driven by substantial consumer demand for value added products like ketchup, sauces, fast foods and hotel chains (Khan and Ghafar, 2013). Furthermore, consumer market is witnessing food diversification with expansion into ready-to-eat food products like pizza, curry gravies and processed foods as compare to traditional use like puree, ketchup, sauces, dried tomato and juices (Noorani et al., 2015, GOP, 2015b). Although the value-added tomato products' demand is expanding, Pakistan’s tomato processing industry is usually confronted with the issues of limited supply of tomatoes due to low yields that increase cost and risk (climatic variability) of growing tomatoes at large scale. As a result, the imports of fresh tomato increased enormously since 2008 (Figure 2).
Data Source: GOP 2016 and 2020
Figure 2: Pakistan’s domestic tomatoes shortage trend (000 Tons)
The low yield of tomato production mainly attributed to climate variability in Pakistan. In the hot-wet season, production shifts from lowlands to the relatively cooler and dryer highlands. Because highland production areas are limited, tomato supply decreases during the wet season which results in drastic price increases. Although there is plenty of evidence that climate change impacts agriculture growth (Afzal et al., 2011; Arku, 2013; Attoh et al., 2014; IPCC, 2012), but there is very little evidence to tie this issue with respect to perishable commodities like tomato and other vegetables in Pakistan (Ali, 2000; Tahir et al., 2012). The aim of the study is to identify the origin and seasonality of tomato production in Pakistan; assess the short and long run relationship of environmental variables with tomato production; forecast the future trends of these impacts; identify the issues faced by the farmers and commission agents.
Theoretical framework: The available literature revealed that, there is a two-way causation between temperature variability and change in rainfall pattern across the globe, particularly in developing countries and other variables such as the concentration of sunlight and carbon dioxide which all have an increasing trend over the period. It is established that, the climate variability has a great influence on vegetables' and crops' yields in all dimensions of the food security (food accessibility, availability and utilization).
Source: Inspired and designed from FAO (2012)
Figure 3. Climate variability impact on the tomato yield
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data Collection: This study used the mixed method approach (quantitative and qualitative). Both secondary and primary data were collected. For quantitative approach, the monthly time series data were collected from the period 1991M1[1] to 2018 M1[2]. The data is obtained from "Government of Pakistan", “Food and Agriculture Organization” and “World Bank's climate change knowledge portal”.
The rapid appraisal method was used to collect primary data from farmers and commission agents of three fruits and vegetables markets (Lahore, Faisalabad and Multan) in April and August 2018. Telephonic interviews were conducted with 50 farmers and commission agents.
Data Analysis: The first objective was to identify the origin and seasonality of tomato production in Pakistan. To meet this objective, ArcGIS Software was used for mapping the national and regional supply lines of tomato in Pakistan. The prices of tomato were considered endogenous variable and as a proxy for tomato production, and average monthly temperature and rain are taken as exogenous variables. To explain the long and short run relationship of the tomato prices with the climate change by using the ARDL[3] model (equations 1 and 2, respectively).
(1)
(2)
To forecast tomato prices and other climate change variables and future policy analysis of the explanatory variables changes, Vector Autoregressive Multivariate Forecasting Technique was applied.
Figure 4: Forecasting technique
General structure of the vector autoregressive (VAR) model for Cotton lint Production:
(3)
Where are the parameter matrices, and assume to be normally distributed with zero mean and constant variance?
(4)
The VAR with onlylags (5)
The order p is selected by minimizing the lag order via Akaike information criterion (AIC)
(6)
And
(7)
At the end in Section II rapid appraisal method was used to collect primary data from farmers and commission agents of three fruits and vegetables markets. Both open and closed ended questions were asked. The telephonic interview was deemed suitable because majority of the respondents (commission agents) were easily accessible on phone call instead of face to face interview.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Origin and seasonality of tomato production in Pakistan: Local production of tomato comes from almost all the provinces of Pakistan at different times of the year. Figure 5 explains the origin and season (time) of tomato supply in Pakistan.
Figure 5: Tomato Availalablity Clander & Provincewise Production Share (2018) Short and Long Run Relationship Analysis
It is prerequisite to check the stationarity order of all the series before analyzing the time series. Therefore, we used ADF unit root test and the ADF unit root test estimated results at level with and without trend, at first difference with and without trend are presented in table 1. The depicted results of the table 1 shows that we can reject the null hypothesis in case of tomato prices (PT) and Rain fall (R) series at level with trend and concluded prices of tomato (PT) and Rain fall (R) are stationary at level with trend. The temperature series are non-stationary with and without trend at 5%, 10 level of significance and stationery at 1st difference with and without trend.
Table 1: Result of Unit Root
at Level
|
Variables
|
Without
|
Prob.
|
Trend &
|
Prob.
|
Trend
|
Values
|
Intercept
|
Values
|
PTt
|
-1.223
|
0.666
|
-8.987
|
0.000
|
Rt
|
-4.170
|
0.001
|
-4.177
|
0.005
|
Tt
|
1.657
|
1.000
|
0.756
|
1.000
|
1st Difference
|
Variables
|
Without
|
Prob.
|
Trend &
|
Prob.
|
Trend
|
Values
|
Intercept
|
Values
|
Tt
|
-20.164
|
0.000
|
-20.323
|
0.000
|
PT=Price of Tomato, R= Rainfall, and T= Temperature.
ARDL long run and short run c-integration relationship between prices of tomato with other climate change variables (Rain Fall and temperature) are presented in Table 2. First part of the table explains the long-term and second part of the table is the short-term relationship between prices of tomato with another climate change.
The volatility of the temperature affects the pattern of crop yield, fruit maturation and time of fruit ripening. The estimated coefficient of temperature shows that there is a positive relationship between tomato prices and temperature as suggested by Hurd and Graves (1984, 1985) that higher air temperature responsible for the higher tomato production. The reported elasticities of the temperature shows that one percent change in temperature lead to increase tomato prices 87.6 percent and statistically significant at 1%,5% and 10% level of significance. One percent change in the rail fall increase the tomato prices 5 percent, but the coefficient of the rain falls statistically insignificant.
The results of short-term relationship between tomato prices with climate change variables (rainfall and temperature) are presented in Table 2. To determine the short-term relationship between the variables the study used the Error Correction Model (ECM). The empirical results indicated that there is a short-term relationship between prices of tomato with climate change variables. The results of Error Correction Model (ECM) explain the convergence pace which is about 62 percent in one year.
Table 2: Results of ARDL
Long-Term Co-integration Forms
|
Variable
|
Coefficient
|
t-Statistic
|
Prob.
|
LNT
|
0.876
|
3.749
|
0.000
|
LNR
|
0.050
|
1.347
|
0.179
|
C
|
3.836
|
5.427
|
0.000
|
TREND
|
0.006
|
15.552
|
0.000
|
Short-Term Co-Integrating Form
|
∆lnPTt-1
|
0.134
|
2.239
|
0.026
|
∆lnPTt-2
|
-0.101
|
-1.850
|
0.065
|
∆lnT
|
-0.106
|
-0.701
|
0.484
|
∆lnTt-1
|
0.494
|
1.997
|
0.047
|
∆lnTt-2
|
-0.026
|
-0.111
|
0.912
|
∆lnTt-3
|
-0.572
|
-3.838
|
0.000
|
∆lnR
|
0.031
|
1.384
|
0.167
|
∆TREND
|
0.003
|
7.638
|
0.000
|
ECMt-1
|
-0.616
|
-9.086
|
0.000
|
Adjusted R2 0.741 F-statistic 92.120*** Durbin-Watson: 1.942
Dependent variable: PT (Monthly tomato price)
Table 3 presented the results of the estimation test after the ARDL boundary which explains the existence of the long-term relationship between tomato prices with climate change variables.
Table 3: ARDL Bounds test
Test Statistic
|
Value
|
K
|
F-statistic
|
45.09885
|
2
|
Critical Value Bounds
|
Significance
|
I0 Bound
|
I1 Bound
|
10%
|
4.19
|
5.06
|
5%
|
4.87
|
5.85
|
2.50%
|
5.79
|
6.59
|
1%
|
6.34
|
7.52
|
Null Hypothesis: No long-run relationships exist
The empirical results of the ARDL bounds test verified the existence of long-term relationship between prices of tomato with climate change variables. We can reject the null hypothesis based on F-Statistics value which is grater then upper and lower bounds.
Figure 6: ECM Co-integration Graph
Forecasting Analysis: The forecasted results and future policy prospects of the tomato prices with respect to climate change shock are presented in figure 7. The forecasted results of the study were estimated by using the Vector autoregressive (multivariate analysis) technique. Due to nature of crop “tomato” and data limitation it is reliable that to forecast only for next three years.
Figures 7 included three panel graphs show output of forecasted trend of tomato’s prices, rain fall, and temperature for the period of year 2016 m1 to 2019 m12. Where year 2016m1 to 2019m12 shows the within sample, and 2017m1 to 2018 m12 out of sample forecasted trend of tomato’s prices, rain fall, and temperature. The double pipe line shows the trend of actual data (including tomato’s prices, rain fall, and temperature), and black line shows the forecasted trend of the data (including tomato’s prices, rain fall, and temperature). The VAR forecasted results illustrated parallel trend just like the original series of the tomato’s prices. The (Figure 8) shows future trends of average monthly tomato prices, rain fall, and temperature by adopting out of sample forecasting method for Pakistan. This provides useful information to understand the future dynamics about average wholesale tomato prices over the period 2016 and 2019. The (Figure 9) shows forecasted trend which illustrated the price’s volatility was a great dis-incentive for both consumers and producers, especially in the context of the consistently low yields achieved by Pakistan tomato farmers as a result of temperature variability.
Figure 7 Forecasting results
Figure 8: Forecasting results with Temperature Shock
Figure 9: Forecasting Results with Rain Shock
From the forecasting series, there was apparent that temperature variability had adverse impact on tomato yield instead of rainfall. While the impact of temperature on tomato yield has temporal and spatial with respect to prices and the future tomato yield will depend on climate situation and farmer’s crop management practices. To increase or maintain tomato yields under climate variability an appropriate adaptation package is required to support tomato cropping systems in near future.
Qualitative analysis
Tomato production issues in Pakistan: A summary of key tomato production issues raised by farmers and commission agents of fruits and vegetables markets after interviewing them and suggested by some responses/solutions are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4 : Problems, consequences and possible solutions
Problem
|
Reason/Causes
|
Consequences
|
Possible Solutions
|
Limited Area/Production
|
less profitability, Markets
|
Price Volatility
|
Vibrant Market System, Processing & Value chain, crop diversification
|
Low Yield
|
Climate Variability (Temperature, Rainfall)
|
High Price for consumer,
High cost for Producer
|
Appropriate Adaptation, Climate Resistant Seeds
|
Pest Diseases, Abiotic Stress
|
Climate Variability, Low Quality Seed
|
Risk Production cost, Pesticides use
|
protected cultivation, Resistant crop, IPM, grafting
|
Labor Shortage
|
Low MPN, Low income
|
Labor unavailable,
Expensive
|
Labor Saving Technologies, long Shelf life, Mechanization
|
Poor Water management
|
Climate Variability (Temperature, Rainfall)
|
Low water tables,
Water Shortage
|
Plastic mulches, drip Irrigation
|
Lack of Modern Information
|
Illiteracy, Limited Reach of Institutions
|
Bad crop Management
|
Private extension services, Technical Training & Workshop, establish link between academia and field
|
Tomato production decisions is normally linked expected profitability which depends on expected tomato prices. However, due to market imperfections the local farmers could not able to get optimal prices of its output. Similarly, low yield allied with climate conditions and non-availability of hybrid & climatic resistant seed, declining the production area and less profit margins are major causes of deploring production lines. Therefore, an appropriate solutions and responses are listed in Table 4 to mitigate the impact of climate variability and market imperfections.
Conclusion: This study examined the dynamics of climate variability such as rainfall and temperature on tomato production. The forecasting results from the present study could be used as a baseline to understand the consequences of climate variability on fruits and vegetables production. The study came up with conclusion that the temperature shocks had adverse dynamics on tomato production by using monthly time series data for this purpose from 1991M1 to 2018 M1. However, it is observed there was an ambiguous role of rainfall, sometime it was helpful to increase the tomato yield and vice versa. These results could not be too optimistic for Pakistan agriculture system because it is based on a labor-intensive system with very little adaptive capacity. Regarding the climate variables used in this study, particularly temperature, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that agriculture could be affected by future climate change and climate variability, because the results demonstrate a correlation between temperature and tomato production in Pakistan.
The results of the effect of high temperature on tomato production indicates that farmers face production losses. Since Pakistan is highly vulnerable to climate variability and agriculture is the major source of livelihood for more than 60% of total population, therefore it is important to develop the climatic resistant seeds and varieties which can mitigate the climate variability and help to increase productivity. To improve the financial capacity of tomato growers, it is important to develop allied tomato value chain industry that will motivate the farmers to enter into tomato production which will help to reduce poverty in rural areas. The access of reliable information about weather dynamics to enable tomato farmers that could improve the adaptive strategies and planning activities. The pre information about weather conditions will be useful to mitigate the adverse effects of climate variability. Government should take appropriate measures to provide help to vegetables growers such as tomato growers in availability of subsidies inputs (e.g. pesticides, insecticides, climatic resistant seeds and fertilizer).
Acknowledgements:The authors wish to acknowledge USAID, US-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Agriculture and Food Security (USPCAS-AFS); and Punjab Agricultural Research Board (PARB) for funding the project-PARB-969. The authors further acknowledge the support of ORIC and UAF in order to complete the research.
Conflict of Interest Statement: It is hereby declared that there is no conflict of interest(s) among authors or any other party regarding this article “Forecasting tomato production under climate variability in Pakistan”
REFERENCES
- Afzal, M., M.G. Mansell and A.S. Gagnon (2011) Trends and variability in daily precipitation in Scotland. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 6:15– 26.
- Ali, M (2000). Dynamics of vegetables in Asia: A synthesis. In: Ali, M. (ed) Dynamics of vegetable production, distribution and consumption in Asia. AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan, pp 1-29.
- Anley, Y., A. Bogale, and A. Haile-Gabriel (2007) Adoption decision and use intensity of soil and water conservation measures by smallholder subsistence farmers in Dedo district, Western Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development, 18: 289–302.
- Arku, F.S (2013). Local creativity for adapting to climate change among rural farmers in the semi-arid region of Ghana. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 5(4): 418-430.
- Attoh, C., E. Martey, G.T.M. Kwadzo, P.M. Etwire and A.N. Wiredu (2014). Can farmers receive their expected tomato price in Ghana? A probit regression analysis. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 3(2): 1623.
- Bakhsh, K (2007) An analysis of technical efficiency and profitability of growing potato, carrot, radish and bitter gourd: a case study of Pakistani Punjab. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Farm Management, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
- CCPI (2017) Climate change performance index. German Watch, Bonn, Germany. Online available at https://germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/publication/18826.pdf accessed on14/03/2019
- Christensen, J.H., B. Hewitson, A. Busuioc, A. Chen, Z. Gao, I. Held, R. Jones, R.K. Koli, W.T. Kwon, R. Laprise, V.M. Rueda, L. Mearns, C.G. Menendez, J. Raisanen, A. Rinke, A. Sarr and P. Wheton (2007) Regional climate projections, In: Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (Eds) (2007) Climate change: Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 847–940
- Cinco. T.A., R.G. Guzman, F.D. Hilario and D.M. Wilson (2014) Long-term trends and extremes in observed daily precipitation and near surface air temperature in the Philippines for the period 1951–2010. Atmospheric Research, 145(146): 12–18.
- FAO (2012) Guidelines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Online available at: http://www.fao.org/3/i1983e/i1983e00.htm
- FAO (2013) FAO statistical year book. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Rome.
- Furuya, J., S. Kobayashi and S.D. Meyer (2009) Impacts of global warming on the world food market according to SRES scenarios. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 57.
- GOP (2015a) Agricultural statistics of Pakistan 2014-15. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Agriculture Statistics Section, Islamabad.
- GOP (2015b) Household integrated economic survey 2013-14. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Agriculture Statistics Section, Islamabad.
- GOP (2016) Agricultural statistics of Pakistan 2015-16. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Agriculture Statistics Section, Islamabad.
- GOP (2020) Economic survey of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.
- Hurd, R.G. and C.J. Graves (1984) The influence of different temperature patterns having the same integral on the earliness and yield of tomatoes. Acta Horticulturae 148: 547-554.
- Hurd, R.G. and C.J. Graves (1985) Some effects of air and root temperatures on the yield and quality of glasshouse tomatoes. Journal of Horticultural Science 60: 359-371.
- IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation, A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Khan, R.E.A. and S. Ghafar (2013) Technical efficiency of tomato production: A case study of district Peshawar (Pakistan).World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(10): 1389-1392.
- Kirby, J.M., M. Mainuddin, F. Mpelasoka, M.D. Ahmad, W. Palash, M.E. Quadir, S.M. Shah-Newaz and M.M. Hossain (2016) The impact of climate change on regional water balances in Bangladesh. Climate Change, 135:481–491.
- Noorani, S., I.N. Memon, M.U. Arain, M.Y. Sidhu, A.A. Mirani, A.K. Khattak, S.A. Sial, R. Jamali, R.H. Jamali and A.H. Jamro (2015). Comparative economic analysis of hybrid tomato v/s conventional tomato production in district Tando Allahyar Sindh, Pakistan. Food Science and Quality Management, 40: 1-14.
- Paltasingh, K.R. and P. Goyari (2013) Supply response in rain fed agriculture of Odisha, Eastern India: A vector error correction approach. Agricultural Economics Review, 14(2): 89.
- Schlenker, W., W. Hanemann and A. Fisher (2005) The impact of global warming on U.S. agriculture: An econometric analysis of optimal growing conditions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1): 113-125.
- Tahir, A., H. Shah, M. Sharif, W. Akhtar and N. Akmal (2012). An overview of tomato economy of Pakistan: comparative analysis. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 25(4).
Appendix
Lag selection Graph: The lag section criteria are based on the Akaike information criteria (AIC) which are used to select the lag structure of the ARDL model. The results of the graph indicate that out of the different models estimated by using Akaike info criterion, the chosen model with lag order ARDL (3, 0, 4, 4). |