ASSOCIATION OF THE PAX7’S 31-BP-INDEL POLYMORPHISM WITH SOME MEAT QUALITY TRAITS IN VIETNAMESE NOI CHICKENS AT 91 DAYS OLD
N.T.D. Thuy1, N.T.H. Tuoi2,6, N.T. Giang3,4, H.T.P. Loan2, T.T. Hoan6, N.T. N. Linh2 and D.V.A. Khoa5,6
1Institute of Biotechnology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology; 2Can Tho University, Vietnam; 3An Giang University, An Giang, Vietnam; 4Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 5Southwest University of Science and Technology, China; 6Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry, Vietnam
Corresponding author’s email: dovoanhkhoa@tuaf.edu.vn
ABSTRACT
Pax7 is important for the activation of satellite cells during myogenesis as well as the development of muscle, which can relate to meat quality traits. However, no evidence for this has been reported. In this study, an investigation into the relation between the 31 bp-indel polymorphism of the Pax7 and meat traits was conducted on 355 native Noi broilers. Thus, firstly, three genotypes (EE, EF and FF with frequencies of 0.12, 0.70 and 0.18, respectively) of Noi chickens at this locus were detected based on distinct PCR fragments of agarose gel. Secondly, some traits of meat quality and chemical composition were evaluated on the chicken population. Finally, a correlation analysis among genotypes and the observed traits showed that the 31bp-indel site was significantly associated with (i) the yellowness (b*) at 3h and 48h post-mortem of beast meat, (ii) the redness (a*) at 3h and the yellowness (b*) at 48h post-mortem of thigh meat, and (iii) cooking loss at 48h post-mortem of thigh meat (p≤0.05). Furthermore, statistically significant differences in the interaction among genotypes and sex for colour traits and pH of breast or thigh meat at different time points as well as the crude protein of breast meat were found (p≤0.05). In conclusion, the 31 bp-indel of PAX7 gene could be considered as a theoretical basis for further research on the application of the PAX7 gene in Noi chicken breeding programs.
Keywords: genetic variation, meat, Noi chickens, quality traits.
https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2022.1.0397
Published online June 14, 2021
INTRODUCTION
Paired box (PAX) genes encode transcription factors governing the determination of different cell types and even organs in the development of multicellular animals (Vorobyov and Horst, 2006). They are a family of nine regulatory genes (PAX1 to PAX9), playing a crucial role in the formation of skeletal tissues and organs during embryonic development and postnatal muscle growth (Buckingham and Relaix, 2007). While PAX3 is important for the migration of muscle precursors from the somites, PAX7, a paralogue of PAX3, plays a key role in the proliferation and differentiation of muscle fibre as well as regeneration, survival, anti-apoptosis, and self-renewal of satellite cells (Seale et al., 2000; Buckingham and Relaix, 2007, Chang et al., 2011). The absence of both PAX3 and PAX7 will result in the deficit in myogenesis of skeletal muscle, delaying embryonic and fetal development (Relaix et al., 2005).
In chicken, PAX7 is an early marker for satellite cells during the early stages of post-hatch growth (Halevy et al., 2004) and continually expressed during the postnatal development of chickens (Guobin et al., 2011). Zhang et al. (2014) showed that a novel 31-bp indel found in intron 3 of the PAX7 gene (located on chromosome 21 and including 10 exons) had a negative effect on chicken growth and carcass traits, and a positive effect on meat quality traits (Zhang et al., 2014). Further findings in male Vietnamese Noi chickens revealed the 31-bp indel in PAX7 that was significantly associated with the feed conversion ratio at the later period (56-84 days of age) ( Unpublished). However, the function of PAX7 on the quality of Noi chicken meat has been still missing. The objective of the study was to analyze whether the PAX7 gene’s 31bp-indel polymorphisms could be used as a molecular marker for selecting Noi broilers with meat quality traits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and sampling: This study was conducted on a resource population of 355 Vietnamese native Noi chickens (164 males and 191 females) raised in cages and fed a commercial diet of 17% crude protein and 3,000 kcal/kg ME from 29-91 days old (Khoa et al., 2019). At 91 days of age, all chickens were slaughtered to evaluate for traits of meat quality. The samples of breast and thigh meat were immediately subjected to chilled storage at 4oC refrigerated conditions for further analysis (Tuoi et al., 2020). Additionally, blood was collected from the wing vein of all chickens at 84 days of age, contained in a 2 mL EDTA tube, and stored at 4oC for DNA extraction later.
Phenotyping: As described by Tuoi et al. (2020), (i) the quality traits of breast and thigh meat including pH value (Cömert et al., 2016), parameters of surface colour (L*, a* and b*) (C.E.I., 1978), cooking loss (Bertram et al., 2003), and drip loss (Guan et al., 2013) were evaluated at three different time points of 3, 24, and 48 h post-mortem. Chemical compositions of breast meat such as dry matter (DM), ether extract (EE) and crude protein (CP) were analyzed (AOAC, 2005).
Genotyping: Genomic DNA was extracted from the collected blood samples by a standard procedure using Proteinase K digestion followed by a phenol-chloroform extraction and a precipitation with ethanol (Ausubel et al., 1995).
The primer pair of PAX7.F: 5’-CTTTTTCTCTCTCCCCTTCC-3’ and PAX7.R: 5’-CAGACCCTCAGCACAACTCA-3’ (Zhang et al., 2014) was used for PCR amplification. PCR was performed in a 20 µl reaction containing 1x PCR Buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.25 mM for each dNTPs, 5 pM for each primer, 1U Taq-polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 100 ng genomic DNA. A thermal cycle was set as follows: an initial denaturation at 94℃ for three minutes followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94℃ for 45 seconds, annealing at 57℃ for 45 seconds and an extension at 72℃ for 45 seconds, and an additional extension of 72℃ for 10 minutes. A PCR reaction was carried out on the Veriti™ 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems). Genotype of 31 bp-indel was determined according to the size of PCR fragment generated (the presence or absence of 31 bp-indel) on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The expected lengths of amplicon with and without 31 bp-indel of PAX7 gene corresponding to E and F alleles were 588 bp and 557 bp, respectively.
Analysis: In this study, (i) genotypic and allelic frequencies were determined in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium by using Chi-square test; and (ii) the General Linear Model (Minitab ver. 16.0) was used to analyze differences among the PAX7 genotypes and phenotypic traits of meat quality as follows: yijk = m + ai + bj + (a*b)ij + eijk, whereas yijk is the dependent variable, m is the overall population mean, aI is the fixed effect of sexes (i=1-2), bj is the fixed effect of genotypes (i=1-3), (a*b)ij is the fixed effect of sex and genotype interaction, and eijk is the random error.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Genotypic and allelic frequency: The obtained data in Table 1 indicated that all genotypes EE, EF and FF were detected with different frequencies in the Noi population as well as within either males or females. The heterozygous genotypes EF (0.70) had the highest frequency, while the homozygous ones EE (0.12) was lowest. The allelic frequencies E and F were 0.47 and 0.53 in population, 0.45 and 0.55 in males, as well as 0.49 and 0.51 in females, respectively. These frequencies significantly deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p≤0.05). Zhang et al. (2014) reported that the EF genotype was the dominant genotype and the E allelic frequency (0.51-0.55) was a little higher than the F allelic frequency (0.45-0.49) in an F2 Gushi ×Anka broiler.
Figure 1: A representative pattern of various PAX7 genotypes (from the left side, well 1: EE genotype, 31bp inserted; well 2-3: FF genotype, 31bp-deleted; well 4: DNA ladder; well 5-7: EF genotypes)
Table 1: Genotypic and allelic frequency
Locus
|
Observed population
|
Expected population
|
HWE χ2
|
|
Genotype
|
Allele
|
Genotype
|
|
Population
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAX7-31bp
|
EE (43)
|
EF (247)
|
FF (65)
|
E
|
F
|
EE
|
EF
|
FF
|
55.93
|
(n=355)
|
0.12
|
0.70
|
0.18
|
0.47
|
0.53
|
0.22
|
0.50
|
0.28
|
≤0.00001S
|
Male
|
|
|
|
|
PAX7-31bp
|
EE (19)
|
EF (109)
|
FF (36)
|
E
|
F
|
EE
|
EF
|
FF
|
19.37
|
(n=164)
|
0.12
|
0.66
|
0.22
|
0.45
|
0.55
|
0.20
|
0.49
|
0.30
|
≤0.0001S
|
Female
|
|
|
|
|
PAX7-31bp
|
EE (24)
|
EF (138)
|
FF (29)
|
E
|
F
|
EE
|
EF
|
FF
|
37.99
|
(n=191)
|
0.13
|
0.72
|
0.15
|
0.49
|
0.51
|
0.24
|
0.50
|
0.26
|
≤0.0001S
|
s: The results are significantly different from HWE at p≤0.05.
Association study: The results in Table 2 showed no significant association between the 31-bp-idel polymorphism and the values of pH or drip loss (p>0.05). However, the significant differences of this polymorphism on some colour traits such as the yellowness (b*) at 3 h and 48 h post-mortem for of beast meat samples (p≤0.05), the redness (a*), and the yellowness (b*) of thigh meat after slaughtering at 3 h and 48 h time points, respectively were found. At the same time points, the lightness (L*) of breast meat was always higher than that of thigh meat in three different genotypes, while the redness (a*) were in contrast to two other kinds of meat. It was probably due to the higher content of heme pigment and a higher proportion of red muscle fibres which were known to be high in myoglobin concentrations, while the breast meat was almost composed of white fibres (Barbut, 2001; Wideman et al., 2016).
Especially, the yellowness (b*) had many fluctuations in the same genotypes at various observed time points. Furthermore, the 31bp-idel showed a significant association with the cooking loss of thigh meat at the 48-h post-mortem where the chickens with the genotype EE (31.72%) had the highest value followed by the genotype EE (31.33%) and the FF (31.21%). Compared with the homozygous genotypes, chickens with the EE genotype displayed the observed values higher than those with the FF one, mostly and generally.
Table 2: Effects of genotypes on the quality traits of breast and thigh meat
Traits
|
Genotypes
|
SEM
|
P
|
EE (n=43)
|
EF (n=247)
|
FF (n=65)
|
Breast meat
|
|
|
|
|
|
3h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.65
|
5.62
|
5.64
|
0.02
|
0.570
|
L*
|
56.64
|
57.61
|
57.11
|
0.52
|
0.374
|
a*
|
1.22
|
1.05
|
1.12
|
0.24
|
0.883
|
b*
|
12.25a
|
12.56ab
|
11.47b
|
0.36
|
0.049
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
26.14
|
25.42
|
25.08
|
0.81
|
0.748
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.73
|
2.66
|
2.85
|
0.12
|
0.437
|
24h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.56
|
5.56
|
5.58
|
0.02
|
0.517
|
L*
|
57.14
|
57.21
|
57.45
|
0.51
|
0.913
|
a*
|
1.64
|
1.45
|
1.55
|
0.26
|
0.855
|
b*
|
11.50
|
11.54
|
10.79
|
0.38
|
0.281
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
29.60
|
30.48
|
31.34
|
0.99
|
0.590
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.12
|
2.06
|
2.01
|
0.10
|
0.827
|
48h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.55
|
5.54
|
5.56
|
0.02
|
0.746
|
L*
|
56.24
|
56.70
|
57.34
|
0.46
|
0.360
|
a*
|
2.20
|
1.82
|
1.37
|
0.29
|
0.241
|
b*
|
12.28a
|
12.32ab
|
11.24b
|
0.36
|
0.050
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
28.54
|
30.78
|
30.69
|
0.94
|
0.256
|
Drip loss (%)
|
1.44
|
1.63
|
1.69
|
0.10
|
0.345
|
Thigh meat
|
|
|
|
|
|
3h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.93
|
5.95
|
5.97
|
0.02
|
0.547
|
L*
|
56.41
|
56.49
|
55.59
|
0.50
|
0.350
|
a*
|
4.86ab
|
5.31a
|
4.29b
|
0.30
|
0.021
|
b*
|
11.58
|
10.94
|
10.27
|
0.48
|
0.275
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
28.08
|
28.07
|
28.73
|
0.81
|
0.802
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.74
|
2.63
|
2.75
|
0.17
|
0.799
|
24h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.82
|
5.83
|
5.82
|
0.03
|
0.879
|
L*
|
55.94
|
56.30
|
55.73
|
0.45
|
0.566
|
a*
|
5.27
|
5.46
|
4.80
|
0.34
|
0.296
|
b*
|
11.07
|
10.71
|
11.21
|
0.49
|
0.676
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
30.88
|
32.45
|
30.45
|
1.02
|
0.214
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.46
|
2.36
|
2.21
|
0.11
|
0.418
|
48h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.80
|
5.82
|
5.79
|
0.03
|
0.499
|
L*
|
55.16
|
56.15
|
55.53
|
0.47
|
0.259
|
a*
|
5.94
|
6.76
|
5.66
|
0.49
|
0.125
|
b*
|
13.26a
|
12.65a
|
10.39b
|
0.62
|
0.006
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
31.72
|
31.33
|
31.21
|
0.91
|
0.006
|
Drip loss (%)
|
1.86
|
2.09
|
1.95
|
0.11
|
0.289
|
Mean values in the same row having different superscripts are significantly different (p≤0.05). L*= lightness, a* = redness, b* = yellowness.
In Table 3, (i) for breast meat, there was a statistically significant interaction between the genotype and sex on L* and b* at 3h, pH at 24h and 48h, b* at 24h and 48h post-mortem (p≤0.05); (ii) for thigh meat, the interaction between the genotype and sex on b* at 48h post-mortem (p≤0.05) was found. The level of mRNA for PAX7 was dependent on the type and size of the muscle, which was particularly higher in breast muscle (Ropka-Molik et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2014). The interaction results between the genotype and sex of breast meat in the present study confirmed this view. However, these differences were not transparently identified between genders. According to (Wideman et al., 2016), the colour of breast and thigh seemed to be independent of the chicken’s sex and might be associated with their age.
Table 3: Effects of sex and genotype interaction on the quality traits of breast and thigh meat
Traits
|
Genotypes
|
SEM
|
P
|
EE
|
EF
|
FF
|
Male
(n=19)
|
Female
(n=24)
|
Male
(n=109)
|
Female
(n=138)
|
Male
(n=36)
|
Female
(n=29)
|
Breast meat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.68
|
5.61
|
5.64
|
5.60
|
5.63
|
5.65
|
0.03
|
0.211
|
L*
|
57.41ab
|
56.03ab
|
58.40a
|
56.99b
|
56.08a
|
58.35ab
|
0.73
|
0.027
|
a*
|
1.28
|
1.17
|
0.84
|
1.22
|
1.58
|
0.57
|
0.34
|
0.310
|
b*
|
11.32ab
|
12.98ab
|
11.72a
|
13.22b
|
11.09a
|
11.91ab
|
0.50
|
0.000
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
27.95
|
24.70
|
25.12
|
25.66
|
26.80
|
23.00
|
1.14
|
0.170
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.90
|
2.59
|
2.68
|
2.64
|
2.67
|
3.07
|
0.18
|
0.455
|
24h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.60ab
|
5.53ab
|
5.60a
|
5.52b
|
5.60ab
|
5.56ab
|
0.02
|
0.004
|
L*
|
58.33
|
56.20
|
57.78
|
56.75
|
56.89
|
58.15
|
0.72
|
0.211
|
a*
|
1.27
|
1.92
|
1.31
|
1.55
|
1.87
|
1.16
|
0.37
|
0.637
|
b*
|
10.33ab
|
12.43ab
|
10.80a
|
12.12b
|
10.18a
|
11.56ab
|
0.53
|
0.002
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
29.22
|
29.90
|
30.56
|
30.41
|
31.62
|
30.98
|
1.41
|
0.943
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.24
|
2.02
|
2.05
|
2.06
|
1.87
|
2.17
|
0.15
|
0.742
|
48h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.59ab
|
5.51ab
|
5.57a
|
5.52b
|
5.59ab
|
5.52ab
|
0.02
|
0.008
|
L*
|
57.36
|
55.35
|
56.74
|
56.66
|
56.46
|
58.42
|
0.66
|
0.141
|
a*
|
1.62
|
2.66
|
1.82
|
1.81
|
1.74
|
0.91
|
0.42
|
0.285
|
b*
|
11.51ab
|
12.88ab
|
11.56a
|
12.92b
|
10.30a
|
12.39ab
|
0.50
|
0.000
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
29.44
|
27.83
|
30.38
|
31.09
|
31.38
|
29.84
|
1.33
|
0.534
|
Drip loss (%)
|
1.51
|
1.38
|
1.53
|
1.70
|
1.50
|
1.94
|
0.15
|
0.150
|
Thigh meat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.91
|
5.95
|
5.95
|
5.94
|
6.01
|
5.92
|
0.03
|
0.388
|
L*
|
57.40
|
55.60
|
56.82
|
56.24
|
54.92
|
56.49
|
0.72
|
0.231
|
a*
|
5.38
|
4.43
|
5.24
|
5.37
|
4.25
|
4.34
|
0.43
|
0.103
|
b*
|
11.24
|
11.86
|
10.54
|
11.25
|
9.92
|
10.73
|
0.68
|
0.406
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
28.77
|
27.51
|
27.62
|
28.43
|
29.92
|
27.14
|
1.15
|
0.555
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.76
|
2.73
|
2.63
|
2.63
|
2.54
|
3.04
|
0.24
|
0.818
|
24h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.82
|
5.83
|
5.85
|
5.82
|
5.78
|
5.86
|
0.04
|
0.755
|
L*
|
56.81
|
55.27
|
56.82
|
55.92
|
55.62
|
55.86
|
0.64
|
0.330
|
a*
|
4.88
|
5.57
|
5.34
|
5.55
|
4.38
|
5.26
|
0.48
|
0.459
|
b*
|
10.65
|
11.39
|
10.63
|
10.77
|
10.36
|
12.12
|
0.69
|
0.459
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
28.58
|
32.66
|
32.43
|
32.47
|
28.47
|
32.59
|
1.44
|
0.120
|
Drip loss (%)
|
2.52
|
2.41
|
2.32
|
2.40
|
2.35
|
2.07
|
0.16
|
0.637
|
48h post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH value
|
5.85
|
5.76
|
5.86
|
5.79
|
5.81
|
5.77
|
5.81
|
0.146
|
L*
|
56.34
|
54.48
|
56.23
|
56.08
|
55.17
|
55.97
|
55.71
|
0.377
|
a*
|
5.65
|
6.10
|
6.90
|
6.66
|
5.52
|
5.84
|
6.11
|
0.475
|
b*
|
11.91ab
|
14.05a
|
12.66a
|
12.64a
|
9.00a
|
12.09b
|
12.06ab
|
0.005
|
Cooking loss (%)
|
32.64
|
31.19
|
30.10
|
32.27
|
31.29
|
31.10
|
31.43
|
0.428
|
Drip loss (%)
|
1.99
|
1.79
|
2.00
|
2.16
|
1.79
|
2.15
|
1.98
|
0.267
|
Mean values in the same row having different superscripts are significantly different (p≤0.05). L*= lightness, a* = redness, b* = yellowness.
The dominance effect of 31bp-indel of the PAX7 gene was unclear for the chemical compositions (CM, CP and EE) of breast meat (p>0.05), although chickens carrying the EE genotype showed the higher values of these traits (Table 4). Results in Table 4 showed that the female chickens carrying the EE genotype showed a higher value of CP content than the male ones (24.53 and 23.22, respectively).
Table 4: Effects of genotypes on the chemical composition of breast meat
Traits
|
Genotypes
|
SEM
|
P
|
EE (n=43)
|
EF (n=247)
|
FF (n=65)
|
DM (%)
|
25.22
|
25.13
|
25.03
|
0.13
|
0.682
|
CP (%)
|
23.95
|
23.86
|
23.77
|
0.13
|
0.695
|
EE (%)
|
0.54
|
0.52
|
0.53
|
0.03
|
0.858
|
Table 5: Effects of sex and genotype interaction on the chemical composition of breast meat
Traits
|
Genotypes
|
SEM
|
P
|
EE
|
EF
|
FF
|
Male
(n=19)
|
Female
(n=24)
|
Male
(n=109)
|
Female
(n=138)
|
Male
(n=36)
|
Female
(n=29)
|
DM (%)
|
24.70
|
25.63
|
25.10
|
25.16
|
25.07
|
24.98
|
0.18
|
0.139
|
CP (%)
|
23.22b
|
24.53a
|
23.92ab
|
23.82b
|
23.62b
|
23.95ab
|
0.18
|
0.004
|
EE (%)
|
0.51
|
0.56
|
0.53
|
0.51
|
0.54
|
0.52
|
0.04
|
0.946
|
abMean values in the same row having different superscripts are significantly different (p≤0.05).
In conclusion, significant differences of the 31bp-indel of the PAX7 gene with some colour traits of meat, especially breast meat, were found in the Vietnamese Noi chicken population. These results could be a foundation for further studies on molecular markers in poultry breeding programs, especially Noi chickens as well as other Vietnamese local chicken breeds for traits of meat quality.
Acknowledgements: This study is funded in part by the Can Tho University Improvement Project VN14-P6, supported by a Japanese ODA loan.
REFERENCES
- AOAC (2005). Official methods of analysis of the association of analytical chemists international, 18th Gathersburg, MD U.S.A Official methods.
- Ausubel, F.A., R. Brent, R., R.E. Kingston, D.D. Moore, J.D. Seidman, J.A. Smith and K. Struhl (1995). Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing & Wiley-Interscience, New York.
- Barbut, S. (2001). Basic anatomy and muscle biology. Poultry Products Processing: An Industry Guide. CRC Press, pp. 31-60.
- Bertram, H.C., H.J. Andersen, A.H. Karlsson, P. Horn, J. Hedegaard, L. Nørgaard and S.B. Engelsen (2003). Prediction of technological quality (cooking loss and Napole Yield) of pork based on fresh meat characteristics. Meat Scie. 65(2): 707-712.
- Buckingham, M. and F. Relaix (2007). The role of Pax genes in the development of tissues and organs: Pax3 and Pax7 regulate muscle progenitor cell functions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23: 645-673.
- I. E. (1978). International commission on illumination, recommendations on uniform color spaces, color difference equations, psychometric color terms. Supplement No. 2 to C.I.E. publication No. 15 (E-1.3.1) 1971/ (TC-1.3) 1978. Bureau Central de la C.I.E., Paris, France.
- Cömert, M., Ş. Yilmaz, K. Figen, B. Hakan and M. Selim (2016). Comparison of carcass characteristics, meat quality, and blood parameters of slow and fast grown female broiler chickens raised in organic or conventional production system. J. Anim. Scie. 29(7): 987-997.
- Chang, G.B., X.P. Liu, J. Liao, R. Chen, D.Q. Luan, Y. Zhang, A.Q. Dai, T. Ma, W. Zhou, K.H. Wang and G.H. Chen (2011). Temporal and spatial expression of the Pax-7 gene during chicken embryo and postnatal development. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10: 1785-1788.
- Guan, R., L. Fei, C. Xiao-qiang, M.A. Jie-qing, J. Han and X. Chao-geng (2013). Meat quality traits of four Chinese indigenous chicken breeds and one commercial broiler stock. J. Zhejiang Uni. 14(10): 896-902.
- Guobin, C., L. Xiangping, L. Jing, C. Rong, L. Deqin, Z. Ying, D., Aiqing, M. Teng, Z. Wei, W. Kehua and C. Guohong (2011). Temporal and spatial expression of the Pax-7 gene during chicken embryo and postnatal development. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10: 1785-1788.
- Halevy, O., Y. Piestun, M.Z. Allouh, B.W.C. Rosser, Y. Rinkevich, R. Reshef, Y. Rozenboim, M. Wleklinski-Lee and Z. Yablonka-Reuveni (2004). Pattern of PAX7 expression during myogenesis in the posthatch chicken establishes a model for satellite cell differentiation and renewal. Dev. Dynam. 231: 489-502.
- Khoa, D.V.A., N.T.H. Tuoi, N.T.D. Thuy, S. Okamoto, K. Kawabe, N.T.K. Khang, N.T. Giang and T. Shimogiri (2019). Growth performance and morphology of 28-84 day-old Noi chicken. Anim. Husb. 35: 301-310.
- Tuoi, N.T.H., N.T. Giang, H.T.P. Loan, P.T.H. Phuc, N.V. Dai, T. Shimogigri and D.V.A. Khoa (2020). Meat quality traits of Vietnamese indigenous Noi chicken at 91 days old. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 36(2): 191-203.
- Relaix, F., D. Rocancourt, A. Mansouri and M. Buckingham (2005). A Pax3/Pax7-dependent population of skeletal muscle progenitor cells. Nature 435: 948-953.
- Ropka-Molik, K., R. Eckert and K. Piorkowska (2011). The expression pattern of myogenic regulatory factors MyoD, Myf6 and Pax7 in postnatal porcine skeletal muscles. Gene Expr. Patterns 11: 79-83.
- Seale, P., L.A. Sabourin, A. Girgis-Gabardo, A. Mansouri, P. Gruss and M.A. Rudnicki (2000). Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell 102: 777-786.
- Vorobyov, E. and J. Horst (2006). Getting the proto-Pax by the tail. J. Mol. Evol. 63: 153-164.
- Wideman, N., C.A. O'bryan and P.G. Crandall (2016). Factors affecting poultry meat colour and consumer preferences - A review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 72: 353-366.
- Zhang, S., R.L. Han, Z.Y. Gao, S.K. Zhu, Y.D. Tian, G.R. Sun and X.T. Kang (2014). A novel 31-bp indel in the paired box 7 (PAX7) gene is associated with chicken performance traits. Br. Poult. Sci. 55: 31-36.
|