<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
      <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
      <contributors>
        <authors>
          <author>Mohamed Marzok</author>
          <author>Abdullah Al-mubarak</author>
          <author>Magdy Elgioushy</author>
          <author>Sabry El-khodery</author>
        </authors>
      </contributors>
      <titles>
        <title>PREVALENCE OF EQUINE HERPESVIRUSES (EHVS) INFECTION IN EGYPT: SYSTEMATIC META-ANALYSIS</title>
        <secondary-title>Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</secondary-title>
        <alt-title>JAPS</alt-title>
      </titles>
      <dates><year>2025</year><pub-dates><date>2025/02/18</date></pub-dates></dates>
      <volume>35</volume>
      <number>1</number>
      <pages>36-48</pages>
      <isbn>1018-7081</isbn>
      <electronic-resource-num>https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2025.1.0018</electronic-resource-num>
      <abstract>&lt;p&gt;This report aimed to perform a meta-analysis on the occurrence of Equine herpesvirus (EHV) infection in Egypt. This systematic meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved after a complete search, and eligible articles were identified. Data analysis with random-effects model was performed using a comprehensive meta-analysis software program. The results were presented as effect size, confidence intervals (CI), heterogeneity, and publication bias. A total of 1760 horses from 20 accepted studies were investigated for EHVs infection. Of these, 740 horses were found positive for EHVs, with a prevalence of 42%. The highest prevalence (100%) was during 2016 and 2020. EHV-1 was the most prevalent strain affecting horses in Egypt (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt; 0.05). The prevalence of isolated strains was as follows: EHV-1 (492, 66.48 %), EHV-2 (151, 20.40 %), EHV-4 (105, 14.19 %), and EHV-5 (88, 11.89 %). The mixed EHV-1 and EHV-4 infections were predominant. However, the EHV-3 was not detected in any of these studies. At random effects, the Z-value was -1.539 (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;-value = 0.124). The Q-value (373.103), I-squared (95.17), and p-value (0.000) were the final heterogeneity variables. The Egger&amp;rsquo;s linear regression test did not imply a publication bias, and its outcomes were intercept (-3.66), and 95% confidence interval (-8.23 to -0.9). The results of the present meta-analysis indicated a high prevalence of EHV infection in Egypt, particularly EHV-1. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the prevention and control of this disease.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
      <keywords><keyword>Horse, Epidemiology, EHV, Systematic review</keyword></keywords>
      <publisher>Pakistan Agricultural Scientists Forum</publisher>
      <urls><related-urls><url>https://thejaps.org.pk/AbstractView.aspx?mid=2024-JAPS-2246</url></related-urls></urls>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
