<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
      <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
      <contributors>
        <authors>
          <author>Mohamed Marzok</author>
          <author>Mahmoud Kandeel</author>
          <author>Abdullah Al-mubarak</author>
          <author>Alshimaa Farag</author>
          <author>Adel Elgohary</author>
          <author>Sabry El-khodery</author>
        </authors>
      </contributors>
      <titles>
        <title>GLOBAL PREVALENCE OF FELINE CORONAVIRUS INFECTION (FCOV) IN DOMESTIC CATS: SYSTEMATIC META-ANALYSIS</title>
        <secondary-title>Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</secondary-title>
        <alt-title>JAPS</alt-title>
      </titles>
      <dates><year>2023</year><pub-dates><date>2023/12/13</date></pub-dates></dates>
      <volume>33</volume>
      <number>6</number>
      <pages>1269-1285</pages>
      <isbn>1018-7081</isbn>
      <electronic-resource-num>https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2023.6.0689</electronic-resource-num>
      <abstract>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic meta-analysis on global prevalence of Feline Coronavirus (FCoV) infection. According to the guidelines of PRISMA, the meta-analysis was performed. After compete search, data extraction and selection of studies, data were analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;software program&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-US&quot;&gt;. The results of meta-analysis were 95% confidence intervals, effect size, heterogeneity, weight, and publication bias. In the finally selected studies (54 articles), the overall prevalence of FCoV was 32.42 %, wherein, a total of 13,639 cats out of 42,076 were found to be positive for FCoV. The prevalence of infection was most prevalent in Europe (47.6%), but less prevalent in North and M/ Central America (3.88%). The lowest infection rate was recorded in the USA, but the highest was recorded in Germany (0.6% vs 100%). Results of meta-analysis for fixed effect showed a Z value of -30.213 (p=0.00), but for random effect, the z value was -0.310 (P = 0.756). The degree of heterogeneity in the selected study on both fixed and random effect was measured and demonstrated by the forest plot (I-squared: 99.046; Q-value: 5453.144 and P value: 0.000. The output of the Egger regression test was intercept (1.82), confidence interval (-1.72- 5.37), t-value (1.03) and p-value (0.30). However, the result of Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test was Kendall&amp;rsquo;s Tau (0.00), z-value for Tau (0.00) and P value (0.5). In conclusion, the present results indicate that the FCoV infection is globally widespread. Therefore, strict prevention and control policies should be formulated.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
      <keywords><keyword>Epidemiology, cat, Coronavirus, Prevalence, Meta-analysis</keyword></keywords>
      <publisher>Pakistan Agricultural Scientists Forum</publisher>
      <urls><related-urls><url>https://thejaps.org.pk/AbstractView.aspx?mid=2023-JAPS-932</url></related-urls></urls>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
