<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
      <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
      <contributors>
        <authors>
          <author>H. Khan</author>
          <author>R. Gul</author>
          <author>N. U. Khan</author>
        </authors>
      </contributors>
      <titles>
        <title>APPRAISAL OF INTERACTION AMONG NIPPING AND CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) GENOTYPES AND THEIR CORRELATED RESPONSE FOR GRAIN YIELD</title>
        <secondary-title>Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</secondary-title>
        <alt-title>JAPS</alt-title>
      </titles>
      <dates><year>2017</year><pub-dates><date>2017/08/01</date></pub-dates></dates>
      <volume>27</volume>
      <number>4</number>
      <pages>1295-1302</pages>
      <isbn>1018-7081</isbn>
      <electronic-resource-num>NA</electronic-resource-num>
      <abstract>&lt;p&gt;Nipping is considered to be the cause of increase in seed yield of chickpea. Whether, either morphs of chickpea (Desi &amp;amp; Kabuli) verify this statement or not, an experiment was carried out using twenty chickpea genotypes (11 Desi &amp;amp; 9 Kabuli) and two treatments (nipped, control). Two nippings were carried out with 20-25 days interval. Data analysis revealed highly significant differences among genotypes, treatments and genotype by nipping interaction for yield and yield attributing traits. Eight genotypes viz, NDC-4-20-3, NIFA-2005, Karak-2, SL-3-15, NKC-5-S-12, Karak-1, NDC-15-1 and SL-3-64 revealed positive response to nipping, which also provides green forage. Whereas, twelve genotypes including 3 Desi and 9 Kabuli genotypes showed disincline to nipping. It is concluded that nipping should not be practised without prior testing of its effect on genotypes.&amp;nbsp; Moreover, Desi chickpea respond positively as compare to Kabuli chickpea. Seed yield plant-1 showed highly significant and positive genotypic and phenotypic correlation with secondary branches plant-1 (rg = 0.54,rp = 0.46), pods plant-1 (rg = 0.89,rp = 0.83), seeds pod-1 (rg = 0.58,rp = 54), biological yield plant-1 (rg = 0.97,rp = 0.92), 100-seed weight (rg = 0.52,rp = 0.53), suggesting these traits to be used as selection criteria for yield improvement.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
      <keywords><keyword>Chickpea, genotypes, nipping, correlation, yield</keyword></keywords>
      <publisher>Pakistan Agricultural Scientists Forum</publisher>
      <urls><related-urls><url>https://thejaps.org.pk/AbstractView.aspx?mid=2017-JAPS-164</url></related-urls></urls>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
