<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
      <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
      <contributors>
        <authors>
          <author>A. Yaghotipoor</author>
          <author>E. Farshadfar</author>
          <author>M. Saeidi</author>
        </authors>
      </contributors>
      <titles>
        <title>EVALUATION OF PHENOTYPIC STABILITY IN BREAD WHEAT ACCESSIONS USING PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC METHODS</title>
        <secondary-title>Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</secondary-title>
        <alt-title>JAPS</alt-title>
      </titles>
      <dates><year>2017</year><pub-dates><date>2017/08/01</date></pub-dates></dates>
      <volume>27</volume>
      <number>4</number>
      <pages>1269-1275</pages>
      <isbn>1018-7081</isbn>
      <electronic-resource-num>NA</electronic-resource-num>
      <abstract>&lt;p&gt;In order to compare parametric and nonparametric stability measures, and to identify high-yield and stable bread wheat genotypes, 20 accessions were grown in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications under 6 irrigated and dryland conditions. Combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bredenkamp test indicated the presence of significant genotype &amp;times;environment interactions. Parametric and non- parametric stability statistics introduced genotypes: G13, G15 and G18 as the most stable. The statistics&lt;img src=&quot;https://archives.thejaps.org.pk/Volume/2017/27-04/abstract/30_clip_image002.gif&quot; width=&quot;18&quot; height=&quot;26&quot;&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;bi&lt;/em&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src=&quot;https://archives.thejaps.org.pk/Volume/2017/27-04/abstract/30_clip_image004.gif&quot; width=&quot;26&quot; height=&quot;28&quot;&gt;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src=&quot;https://archives.thejaps.org.pk/Volume/2017/27-04/abstract/30_clip_image006.gif&quot; width=&quot;28&quot; height=&quot;28&quot;&gt; were desirable for the simultaneous selection of yield and stability. Spearman&apos;s rank correlation indicated that most non-parametric measures were significantly (P&amp;lt;0.01) inter-correlated with parametric measures and therefore can be used as alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
      <keywords><keyword>Bread wheat, GE interaction, parametric and non-parametric measures, stability</keyword></keywords>
      <publisher>Pakistan Agricultural Scientists Forum</publisher>
      <urls><related-urls><url>https://thejaps.org.pk/AbstractView.aspx?mid=2017-JAPS-161</url></related-urls></urls>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
