<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
      <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
      <contributors>
        <authors>
          <author>1I. Habib</author>
          <author>1A. A. Anjum</author>
          <author>2M. Rabbani</author>
          <author>3M.U.D. Ahmad</author>
          <author>1M. A. Ali</author>
          <author>1M. Nawaz</author>
          <author>1 M. Kamran</author>
          <author>4H. M. Khan</author>
        </authors>
      </contributors>
      <titles>
        <title>OCCURRENCE OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANT BACTERIA IN DOGS SUFFERING FROM ENTERITIS</title>
        <secondary-title>Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</secondary-title>
        <alt-title>JAPS</alt-title>
      </titles>
      <dates><year>2016</year><pub-dates><date>2016/02/01</date></pub-dates></dates>
      <volume>26</volume>
      <number>1</number>
      <pages>13-16</pages>
      <isbn>1018-7081</isbn>
      <electronic-resource-num>NA</electronic-resource-num>
      <abstract>&lt;p&gt;Aim of the present study was to isolate bacteria from feacal material of dogs suffering from enteritis and determine their antibiotic resistance pattern. Fecal samples (n=100) were collected from dogs presented at Pet Clinic of University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore with symptoms of enteritis.&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;A total of 210 different bacterial isolates were selected and identified as&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;E. coli&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(127; 60.47%)&lt;em&gt;, Salmonella spp.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(50; 23.81%)&lt;em&gt;, Proteus vulgaris&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(12; 5.71%)&lt;em&gt;, Citrobacter spp.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;(17; 8.09%) and&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Pseudomonas spp.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(04; 1.90%).&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;E. coli&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;were moderately resistant to ampicillin (59.65%) followed by tetracycline (54.33%), kanamycin (52.75%), gentamycin (49.60%), vibramycin (46.45%), ceftriaxone (44.88%), norfloxacin (30.70%) and ciprofloxacin (25.98%).&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Salmonellae&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;werealso moderately resistant to ampicillin (42%), followed by gentamycin (38%), kanamycin (30%), tetracycline (28%), cepharadine (20%), ceftriaxone (16%), vibramycin (14%), ciprofloxacin (12%) and norfloxacin (8%). All the isolates were sensitive to amikacin. The isolates found resistant to more than two antibiotics were declared as multiple drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. Out of 127&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;E. coli&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;isolates, 52 (40.94%) were multiple drug resistant bacteria, followed by&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Salmonella enterica&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;isolates 17(34.00%),&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Citrobacter diversus&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;06 (35.29%),&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Proteus vulgaris&lt;/em&gt; 06 (50%). It is concluded that multiple drug resistance is present in gut pathogens of dogs which may be alarming for public health as well.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
      <keywords><keyword>Dogs, enteritis, Salmonella, E. coli and multiple drug resistance</keyword></keywords>
      <publisher>Pakistan Agricultural Scientists Forum</publisher>
      <urls><related-urls><url>https://thejaps.org.pk/AbstractView.aspx?mid=2016-JAPS-02</url></related-urls></urls>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
